Skip to main content

New answers tagged

1 vote

According to post-2000 Young Earth Creationists / premillennialists, when do (did) we reach year 6000?

Though one assume that the Bible chronological statements are accurate, there is still room for uncertainty. Round off error. As Edwin Thiele proposed, if you have an accession year chronology, a new ...
Paul Chernoch's user avatar
1 vote
Accepted

According to post-2000 Young Earth Creationists / premillennialists, when do (did) we reach year 6000?

In a recent survey published on ResearchGate of (post-2000) Old Testament chronologies of five German and Swiss scholars (who I assume all are Young Earth Creationists) the author analyses the four ...
Valentin's user avatar
0 votes

How do Christians who reject Young Earth Creationism respond to the "God is not a liar" argument?

Most importantly, creation is the first one of two pages of the Bible, which is about 1000-2000 page long. I find a little surprising, that it is such an important question. I think, the application ...
Gray Sheep's user avatar
1 vote

How do Christians who reject Young Earth Creationism respond to the "God is not a liar" argument?

Added: A number of people seem to be misunderstanding this answer. I am NOT defending any of the interpretations of Genesis - YEC or other. So, asking me for examples or to justify one or other ...
Russell McMahon's user avatar
37 votes
Accepted

How do Christians who reject Young Earth Creationism respond to the "God is not a liar" argument?

To put it simply, Old Earth proponents do not believe "God is a liar" but that YEC proponents have misunderstood the Bible. YEC insist on a literal interpretation of Genesis (they call it &...
DJClayworth's user avatar
  • 32.2k
1 vote

How do Christians who reject Young Earth Creationism respond to the "God is not a liar" argument?

proponents of YEC maintain that it logically follows that God cannot be deceptive in Genesis, leading to the conclusion that the Earth must indeed be young, It might lead to that conclusion, but that ...
Ray Butterworth's user avatar
2 votes
Accepted

Why do Old-Earth Creationists and Theistic Evolutionists reject (purported) scientific evidences for a young Earth?

I find the following model instructive. God reveals truth through (at least) 3 means: The prophetic channel of revelation. Inspiration given through an authorized spokesperson intended for a larger ...
Hold To The Rod's user avatar
2 votes

Why do Old-Earth Creationists and Theistic Evolutionists reject (purported) scientific evidences for a young Earth?

To put it simply, because none of those scientific evidences are remotely compelling. All ten of these examples are, at best, things which surprise scientists. They are by no means sufficient to ...
Dark Malthorp's user avatar

Top 50 recent answers are included