1

The child grew and was weaned, and on the day Isaac was weaned Abraham held a great feast. But Sarah saw that the son whom Hagar the Egyptian had borne to Abraham was mocking, and she said to Abraham, “Get rid of that slave woman and her son, for that woman’s son will never share in the inheritance with my son Isaac.”

The matter distressed Abraham greatly because it concerned his son. But God said to him, “Do not be so distressed about the boy and your slave woman. Listen to whatever Sarah tells you, because it is through Isaac that your offspring will be reckoned. I will make the son of the slave into a nation also, because he is your offspring.” (Genesis 21:8-13, NIV)

According to Genesis 21:12 you can see that God is on Sarah's side to send Hagar and Ishmael away. Is it to realize his promises? We all know that God's plan works sometimes strange.

Can somebody maybe elaborate on this please? Because I can't completely understand why God would do something like this.

closed as primarily opinion-based by Nathaniel, curiousdannii, Lee Woofenden, Dan, Waggers Aug 8 '16 at 12:05

Many good questions generate some degree of opinion based on expert experience, but answers to this question will tend to be almost entirely based on opinions, rather than facts, references, or specific expertise. If this question can be reworded to fit the rules in the help center, please edit the question.

3

Plenty of Blame to Go Around

In the drama which unfolds in Genesis 21, there is certainly plenty of blame to go around. If you tend to root for the underdogs, who in this case are Hagar and Ishmael, your heart goes out to them. Abraham had every right to be upset with his wife Sarah for her obvious harshness and indifference toward Hagar ("that slave woman," as Sarah referred to her) and her son Ishmael, whom Sarah had caught either mocking her son Isaac or playing with him as if he were on equal footing with the child of promise, which he was not (Genesis 17:19, NET footnote 17).

Abraham (and Sarah, for that matter) was certainly reaping what he had sown. He had inadvisably listened to his wife in the matter of having a son by Hagar, Sarah's Egyptian maid/slave, and the conflict which ensued was both unnecessary and obviously preventable. As the young people say nowadays, however, "it is what it is."

Sarah was equally to blame for her insistence that Abraham have a son by Hagar (not that Abraham needed that much persuading to have sex with an attractive woman who was probably much, much younger than Sarah!). Had both she and Abraham listened--really listened--to the promise God had made to them in Genesis 17:19 and 18:10, they would not have been in the pickle in which they found themselves in Genesis 21.

Ya' Reaps What Ya' Sows

In the matter of reaping and sowing (see Galatians 6:7-8), there is bound to be unpleasant fallout. God was not, as you suggest, "on Sarah's side" in the matter of Hagar and Ishmael. In a sense, Sarah was behaving quite naturally, since she was guarding zealously the rights and privileges accruing to her son by virtue of his status as the heir apparent. You can rest assured that Abraham expressed his outrage to his wife Sarah for being so heartless and unfair.

God calmed Abraham down, however, and assured him that Hagar and his beloved firstborn had a bright future ahead of them (Genesis 21:13). Moreover, God came to their rescue when Hagar, despairing of her life, cried in God's hearing, and he repeated to her the promise he had made to Abraham that Hagar's son would become a great nation one day (v.18).

And Now, From God's Perspective . . .

Notice I italicized the word his in my last paragraph. I did so because while Ishmael was Abraham's firstborn, God did not consider him Abraham's firstborn! In fact, in Genesis 22, here is what God said to Abraham:

"'Abraham . . . take now your son, your only son, whom you love, Isaac, and go to the land of Moriah, and offer him there as a burnt offering on one of the mountains which I will tell you'" (excerpted from vv.1-2, with my emphasis).

From God's perspective (which should have been Abraham's perspective too), Isaac was Abraham's only son. After all, God had promised Abraham and Sarah a son in their old age. Sarah and Abraham, however, had wavered in faith by taking matters into their own hands in an attempt to "help God." God, of course, needed no helping hand in doing what to them had seemed impossible (see Genesis 18:14).

Appearances Can Be . . . Deceiving

In conclusion, while God may appear to have sided with Sarah, in reality he did not. He graciously gave the child of Sarah's handmaid a bright future by first saving him from a certain death in the wilderness, and then by allowing Ishmael to grow into a skilled hunter who eventually married "one of his own" (an Egyptian) and become a father many times over.

As Sir Walter Scott said (Marmion, 1808), "What a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive." In the affair of Abraham, Sarah, Hagar and Ishmael, there may not have been an intent to deceive, but there was certainly an attempt to perform an "end run" around God. We reap what we sow, and our tangled web is of our own making! Regardless, God still has the last word!

  • What do you mean with "to perform an 'end run' around God"? – Mentos93 Mar 10 '15 at 20:15
  • Mentos93: "to perform an 'end run' around God" means to attempt to "help" God accomplish His purposes in our own way and time, rather than in His way and time. Abe & Sarah thought they could speed up God's plan by using Sarah's handmaid Hagar as a "surrogate" mother. That was not God's plan. His plan was for Abe & Sarah to have their own biological son in the usual way. God didn't want or need their help. Trying to "get ahead of God" is an impossibility, really, and to attempt to do so is a surefire way of messing things up, as was clearly the case with Abe, Sarah, Hagar, and Ishmael! Don – rhetorician Jun 3 '16 at 16:43
  • @Mentos93: The expression "do an end run" is from the sport of American football. An end run is a running play that seeks to go around, rather than through, the defensive line. It is a common idiom for taking evasive action, or finding a creative, perhaps elaborate, way around a problem. (See blog.writeathome.com/index.php/2012/10/football-idioms. Don – rhetorician Jun 3 '16 at 17:18
0

The important failures or "sins" of both Abraham and Sarah relate to their lack of faith, a repudiation of their covenant names and God's promise. God will bring about His promise, all of them. God had chosen the two to bear a son, who's lineage would produce the "offspring" of His original promise in Gen. 3:15. In spite of our sin, God was and is faithful to deliver us through His Son, Jesus, the Anointed One.

-1

Why God appears to be on Sarah's side, is because of the plan God had "before the foundation/creation of the earth" (Bible quote). God planned to send Jesus and Jesus agreed, and God, because He is "all knowing, seeing the end before the beginning" (Bible quote) He had a plan for how to bring Jesus to the earth, and this He planned to do through Abraham's seed through Isaac, which is what alone made Isaac special.

God also had a plan to use the Jewish people, the nation of Israel to show Himself, His Holiness, His laws, etc. through His interaction with them. This was not because they were more special, holy, or anything than any other people group, God just decided to use them to interact with, to show Himself to the people of the earth.

Because Ishmael and Hagar posed a threat to this in some way, God asked Abraham to back Sarah up, and separate from Hagar and Ishmael.

Recall that Isaac was a miracle of God baby, and God Himself said that this was God's plan to give this miracle son to Abraham. Abraham and Sarah's own failed plan was to bring a son for Abraham into the earth through Abraham and Hagar's union.

This was not approved by God and was outside of His plan.

God took care of Hagar and Ishmael with promises which He kept and also provision and protection, as they were separated from Abraham and Sarah.

God never instituted marriage to be between more than one man and one woman, shown in Genesis in the garden when God provided ONE wife for Adam and brought her to him.

Two wives in the house make a very unhappy home life and unhappy husband, as Abraham quickly found out.

God was not against Hagar and Ishmael, and Abraham loved them both as well. The second wife arrangement was an error on Abraham's and Sarah's part where Sarah urged Abraham to bring about God's plan using his own improvisation, which God did not approve of or ask him to do.

Abraham and Sarah sinned and their sin ended up hurting Hagar and Ishmael, which, I believe, to this day, the descendants of Ishmael and Hagar still feel a rejection and resentment over this ancient event, which I would call the sins of Abraham and Sarah.

Sin always does some damage and ends up hurting someone, which is why God hates it.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.