Different churches celebrate the Eucharist (Communion, Lord's Supper, ...) with different frequency. At one extreme, Catholic and high Anglican churches tend to celebrate it at least daily. Many Protestant churches offer it only once a month, though they will have a Sunday service each week. Some churches have Communion even less often - quarterly or annually.

What factors have caused the divergence in practice (between Catholics and Protestants) and how does each modern model compare to the frequency of its celebration in the early Church?


4 Answers 4


As you note, there are lots of different traditions here. My ancestry is Scottish and some old Scottish churches only celebrate communion once a year. I've looked through the some liturgies for these services that basically run all day, and it's quite an affair. I have even heard it advocated that once in a life-time ought to do the job, sort of like baptism. I don't think this is at all the spirit of the thing we find in the NT.

On the other end of the spectrum are those who say that every meal we eat together as believers counts, so basically we do it a couple times a day. For several reasons I don't think this argument holds much water.

By personal background growing up was the "traditional" once a month celebrations. I wouldn't argue that this practice is inherently wrong or sinful, but I think it is arbitrary and not the best representation of what the Lord's Supper is supposed to be about.

I believe the best representation and celebration of the Lords Supper is to do it once a week during the normal Sunday gatherings. This is consistent with the description we have of the early church gathering together (we know they did this specifically in celebration of the resurrection on the first day of each week) and the description we have of them celebrating the sacrament whenever they were gathered together.


The reason for the different traditions of frequency of communion is that there are a wide variety of views within Christianity about what communion actually is. It is so widely disagreed over that Christians often can't agree over what name to call it. The different theologies give rise to different practices of communion, including different frequencies.

It would be far too long and complicated to discuss in detail the different views of communion here. This Wikipedia article gives a reasonable overview, and I will attempt to pull out some salient points.

The Catholic view of Mass (which differs slightly in a technical way from communion, but which we will treat as the same thing for this answer) is that in the Mass the body and blood of Jesus become actually present. Moreover the Mass is an actual sacrifice by the participants, by which the benefits of the sacrifice of Jesus on the Cross are made available to the participants. (I will state here, because of common misconceptions, that this does not imply that the sacrifice of the Mass either adds to or replaces the ultimate sacrifice of Jesus). While the details are complex, the implication of this is that participation in the Mass is beneficial in and of itself. This explains the Catholic practice of attending Mass frequently - once a week for normal members and even more frequently for priests and other religious. Each attendance brings with it benefits, and the more frequently it is done the better.

At the other end of our oversimplified spectrum is the view that communion is simply a memorial - a ritual in which each person remembers the sacrifice and death of Jesus. This was the view espoused by Zwingli, and is generally held by Baptists and similar churches. It is usually referred to as Memorialism. The benefit of participating in this memorial is limited to the extent to which it is helpful to the individual, producing thoughts and feelings that assist the participant's spiritual life. Because there is no intrinsic benefit to attending a service of communion, frequency of attendance is much less. It was thought that since the effects were dependent on the state of the participant's mind, then over-frequent attendance was counter-productive and seen as idolatory by the reformers.

Many churches hold different views to those, and they can roughly be arranged on a line from 'real presence' to 'entirely symbolic'. Frequency of attendance is typically reasonably correlated with being close to the 'real presence' end. Anglicans and Lutherans typically believe in the 'real presence' without necessarily endorsing the doctrine of transubstantiation, and typically celebrate weekly, with celebrations more frequent than daily being discouraged for everyone. Memorialist churches tend to celebrate once a month, or a few times a year.

I might mention a few outliers from this pattern: the Salvation Army, which does not celebrate communion at all (thanks to its origins in as a para-church rather than a church organization, and its strongly anti-alcohol stance) and the churches that associate communion strongly with the Jewish Passover, and celebrate communion once a year.

We know the very early Church shared communion at least once a week, from their specifically celebrating the resurrection on the first day of each week, and the description we have of them celebrating the sacrament whenever they were gathered together. By the middle of the fourth century AD the Eucharist was given in what is more or less the modern Catholic and Orthodox forms, though the various Eastern Rites probably developed slightly before the Latin Rite (ibid). The older weekly celebration corresponds more to the modern Sacramental frequency than to the Memorial frequency, which makes sense since the early Church held the Eucharist to be sacramental in nature (additional citation).

  • Strictly speaking, it is not just that they are present but that the substance of the wine and the bread are transformed into the blood and body. Commented Jun 19, 2012 at 18:12
  • 1
    Regarding frequency of communion in the early Church you mention I have found a very interesting book about how Christians stopped receiving communion frequently. Unfortunately it’s in German (Christologie und Kommunion) so not all will be able to read it (aschendorff-buchverlag.de/detailview?no=13358). Maybe someone here reads German :)
    – stx932
    Commented Jul 15, 2018 at 5:28

As DJClayworth said, there is some correlation to the position between "real presence" and "entirely symbolic", but that's not everything. "Entirely symbolic" understanding of Eucharist usually lead to lower communion frequency, but this doesn't have to be the case - the consequence of lower importance of the communion is especially that it's more arbitrary. This can lead to extremes remembered by Caleb, but usually it just means that "we are used to celebrate Lord's Supper once per month and we see no reason to change it". "Once a month" probably has some historical roots.

On the other hand, in Catholic Church in 21st and big portion of 20th century frequent communion is the norm. But it wasn't always like this! There were times when "once a week" was most usual (especially in the earliest times), when daily communion was normal like today, but also when it was hard to get to communion more often than once a month or once a year. There were theological reasons for all the practices - they were usually closely tied to views of God's love and mercy and of how much is man sinful. Jansenists, who focused on sinfulness and unworthiness of man, proposed rare communion ("People are not worthy of receiving such a gift ever. Well, we can allow then to go to communion once a year, if the do proper repentance."). On the other hand, Catholic theology today focuses more on God's love for us and His willingness to give Himself to us, and frequent communion is a logical consequence.


The Last Supper is practiced in many ways. Firstly, in some aspects, the Bible isn’t very specific. For example, the Bible says to dress modestly, but how do you interpret that? Some Churches dress in white cloaks, where as others just wear smart clothes. This leads to different denominations. Also, the Bible isn’t specific about if you should have alcohol in Church services. The Catholics tend to have wine where-as protestant Churches normally have grape juice. Again, this leads to more denominations! This is because different Churches are doing what they think is correct. Secondly, Catholic/ High Churches tend to celebrate the communion everyday where-as Low/Protestant Churches may celebrate it once a month. Lastly, there has to be different denominations because when Henry the 8th made the Church of England he had to differ the Catholic rules.

  • Welcome to the site. We are glad you decided to participate.
    – user3961
    Commented Nov 9, 2014 at 20:50
  • 1
    Welcome to the site, TheBee! You may be surprised to learn, though, that when Henry VIII passed the Act of Supremacy in 1534, the theology of the Church of England remained the same as that of the Roman Church, only with a different head. It took Henry's successor Edward VI to abolish clerical celibacy, services in Latin, transubstantiation and other Catholic trappings to turn the Church of England into a recognizably Protestant entity.
    – Wtrmute
    Commented Jul 10, 2017 at 20:14

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .