0

I have have read the posts related to this question, but they do not tackle this issue from the same angle.

For the related questions i have seen, the focus was only on why we inherit Adam's sins. I flip and ask why we don't inherit Adam's good deeds?

For those that may say we inherited his "sinful nature" or capacity to do evil but not the original sin itself, that doesn't tally well with the Protestant concept that flows from "we (including children), have all sinned and fallen short of the glory of God". Personally, I believe children come from God pure and without sin.

I believe Adam's sins were his own sins (the "original" and any other sins), and I should not be asked about them; because Adam was a human being with his own issues, and I have mine. To argue otherwise is to contradict Ezekiel 18:19-21

"The soul who sins shall die. The son shall not bear the guilt of the father, nor the father bear the guilt of the son. The righteousness of the righteous shall be upon himself, and the wickedness of the wicked shall be upon himself.."

6
  • 2
    You do not quote any reference to support your opinion. The wicked are estranged from the womb: they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies. Psalm 58:3. I have to think that the question is opinion-based.
    – Nigel J
    Commented Aug 25 at 10:44
  • I quoted Ezekiel 18:19-21 that says my father's (Adam's) sins are his problem.
    – user68393
    Commented Aug 25 at 10:55
  • 3
    The question could be improved by making it concentrate on the main question itself and removing the multiple references to yourself and what you think. Questions should be objective, without any "I-me-mine"s. Commented Aug 25 at 12:13
  • 2
    Yes, Adam's sins are his problem. And each person who inherits his nature (and his tendencies and his liabilities) faces the same problems on their own part. As saith Ezekiel 18 which you quote. Whether or not one is saved from the guilt and from the consequence (of both sin itself and each, single transgression) is a matter of individual repentance and faith (of which Adam is an example).
    – Nigel J
    Commented Aug 25 at 12:44
  • I'm honestly confused by the question, because you state that you don't believe that we acquire the guilt of our fathers, which is literally the answer to the flipped version. We don't acquire the righteousness of our fathers. The answer to both is the same. We suffer the consequences of the actions of our fathers. Be they good or ill.
    – Wyrsa
    Commented Aug 28 at 11:23

1 Answer 1

2

You have part of your answer in Ezekiel 18, which you quote. Verses 5-9 describe a righteous man. Verses 10-13 describe that man’s wicked son. They conclude by telling us that the son will be put to death for his sins and not receive any leniency on account of his father’s good deeds. Thus the good deeds are not inherited.

The Bible does teach that we are made in the image of God. There is part of the original goodness of our nature that persists and is passed down. It is debated even among those who believe in original sin whether it is just an inclination to sin (a sin nature) that is inherited or actual, transferable guilt.

Exodus 34:6-7 says this:

And he passed in front of Moses, proclaiming, “The LORD, the LORD, the compassionate and gracious God, slow to anger, abounding in love and faithfulness, maintaining love to thousands, and forgiving wickedness, rebellion and sin. Yet he does not leave the guilty unpunished; he punishes the children and their children for the sin of the parents to the third and fourth generation.” (Exodus 34:6-7, NIV)

It is fascinating that modern science has proven this verse true. Behavioral traits based on a response to the environment are passed down via epigenetic expression. However, if the stimuli that induced the response disappear from the environment, the effect upon later generations steadily diminishes. This is like things go with alcoholism. The children of alcoholics have strong negative traits, grandchildren of alcoholics have lesser expressions, etc. Those descendants are not guilty of the alcoholic offenses (unless they become alcoholics themselves) but they suffer ill effects due to their parent’s or grandparent’s actions.

What we as humans must NOT do is persecute the children in law or custom by imputing legal guilt to the children of criminals. This is called corruption of blood. Rights, privileges and property could be seized from whole families on account of a family member’s actions. Abolishing this was one goal of the American revolution. It took numerous bills in England during the 19th century to abolish this practice in stages. Even so, it has been creeping back in the form of punitive civil forfeiture laws.

To conclude, it is for God to deal with our inherited sin nature through salvation and spiritual regeneration, not human courts. Human courts are to punish individuals only for acts they commit.

You must log in to answer this question.