This Governmental Theory of the Atonement seems to have been started by one Hugo Grotius (1583-1645). He had been trained in law. Theologically, he was Arminian. There was a sharp divide between Protestants holding to the Five Points of James Arminius and the established Belgic and Heidelberg Confessions of Faith.
One point of Arminius was that of Universal redemption, or general atonement. This taught that Christ died to save all men, but only in a potential fashion. His death was said to enable God to pardon sinners, but only on condition that they believed.
A detailed explanation of Grotius’s theory of Atonement is found in his writing against the Socinians, “Defensio Fidei Catholicae de Satisfactionae Christi adversus F. Socinum” (1636). He used the language of government to spell out his view of God as moral governor of the universe. However, the Reformers maintained that Christ actually received the actual punishment due to men and women – known as the Penal Substitution theory. But in time, traditional Methodism went towards the Arminian ‘camp’. Governmental theory has been detailed by 19th century Methodist theologian John Miley in his Atonement in Christ and his Systematic Theology (ISBN 0943575095) and more recently by Nazarene theologian J. Kenneth Grider in his 1994 book A Wesleyan-Holiness Theology (ISBN 0834115123.) It seems that great emphasis is put on the love of God with respect to this theory.
In this view, Christ's death serves as a moral example, salvation is defined in terms of what the sinner must do leading to perfectionism, moralism, or other works-based forms of religion.
https://www.theopedia.com/governmental-theory-of-atonement