Skip to main content
svidgen's user avatar
svidgen's user avatar
svidgen's user avatar
svidgen
  • Member for 12 years, 1 month
  • Last seen more than a week ago
Loading…
comment
awarded
awarded
awarded
comment
Why did God not want man to have the knowledge of good and evil?
Can you tag a denomination, please? If not, I think this qualifies as a "Truth" question -- not a good fit for the site.
comment
Did God create man to replace the fallen Angels?
This question appears to be off-topic because it doesn't inquire into any particular tradition's official, historical, or widely accepts beliefs.
comment
What's God's justification of not allowing the choice of personal annihilation?
@Calvin Sure ... if you can show that the interpretation thereof is a Baptist interpretation : )
comment
What's God's justification of not allowing the choice of personal annihilation?
This doesn't look to me like the baptist understanding of hell ... If I'm mistaken, please cite some baptist sources!
comment
How does the Catholic Church reconcile evolution with original sin?
I need to read this encyclical more carefully. I get the sense that I'm inserting a comma or a stress somewhere in my head that changes the meaning. The overall nature the letter seems to be a rebuke of over-certainty and following silencing of theological dialogue, provided that the dialogue submits to Church Authority.
comment
How does the Catholic Church reconcile evolution with original sin?
(I've apparently been slacking off enough in my research that some of these more basic items, like what category of teaching encyclicals fall into, have started fading from memory ... )
comment
How does the Catholic Church reconcile evolution with original sin?
Might be worth a chat ... But, starting at around 5 minutes into this, Fr. Barron seems to suggest that Adam is not a literal figure. In your opinion, is he mistaken? Or ... well ... let me ask it this way: Into what category do encyclicals go? They're not on par with dogma, are they?
comment
How does the Catholic Church reconcile evolution with original sin?
Reason I ask: I was actually unaware that a belief in Adam and Eve as individual persons as opposed to potentially as metaphorical stand-ins for "the dawn of humanity" was required. I.e., I'd thought Adam and Eve were in the category as Noah and the Flood -- a literal interpretation is not required. ... Not that this belief requires a strictly literal interpretation of the events. But, certainly more literal than I'd realized.
comment
How does the Catholic Church reconcile evolution with original sin?
Is Humani Generis the only instance you're aware of wherein we're required to believe in the existence of Adam and Eve is the sole origins of the human race?
awarded
Loading…
comment
Understanding grace
In case I don't have time for a full, cited answer later: Everyone is suitably "en-graced" for their particular calling. We don't merit grace by any action. But, our actions can be the vehicles by which grace is delivered or manifest. Similarly, our actions and inactions can also block grace. So, at any given point in time, God's got a mission for you. He pumps you full of the necessary graces to accomplish that mission. Your decision to respond to God takes the form of prayer and good action. Grace becomes manifest. Inaction and explicit sin impedes that grace.
comment
Why does Jesus say this about disciples forgiving others their sins?
Without interest in a specific denomination, this is an opinion question.
reviewed
Approve
reviewed
Approve
1
3 4
5
6 7
42