I have been told that all major Catholic Churches contain within the alter a relic of a saint. Given that saints are not declared until long after the person in questions death, and many saint die in less then favorable conditions, how does the Church go about verifying and collecting relics?


St. Maximillan Kolbe would be a good example of a saint whom we will never be able to identify any of his first degree relics, since he was burned in a Nazi concentration camp during world war II. However, there are many 2nd and 3rd degree relics.

Relics are the remains of a saint. They are classified according to degrees. First degree relics are physical remains of a saint. They are most typically bones. Second degree relics are objects or items that touched a saint while he was alive. The relics of Christ's Passion would be second degree relics. Third degree relics include anything that touched other relics. Normally, it is the bones of the saints and the relics of Christ's Passion that are mentioned among the relics.

Catholic Forum - Relics

The perfectly preserved body parts of lots of European saints aren't going to be transferred to the the Americas any time soon and we've got a lot of work to do to increase our output of saints.

The code of canon law says:

The ancient tradition of placing relics of martyrs or other saints under a fixed altar is to be preserved, according to the norms given in the liturgical books.

Can. 1237 - §2.

So, what do the liturgical books about the degree of relics for altars?

I skimmed over this liturgical book and you can skim it over yourself, but it doesn't say anything about the degree of the relics. It does however say that relics of martyrs are preferred and that only recognizable body parts can be placed in sight. Otherwise, they're put in a box (as a reliquary) under the altar. The altar must be fixed in place so that everyone knows that the relics are there.

I've got to remember to ask what we've got for a relic in my Parish. I hope someone remembers. Hopefully a priest will show up and give you a better answer.

| improve this answer | |
  • Regarding St. Maximillian Kolbe, the Treasures of the Church relic exposition includes a relic containing one of his hairs. I don't know the circumstances of how it was found (perhaps it was found on a set of clothes that he wasn't wearing when burned), but it is incorrect to say that there are no first class relics of him since at least one clearly exists. – Thunderforge May 31 '18 at 13:54
  • @Thunderforge You're probably right, but I've never heard the exact definition of First Class Relics. My assumption would be that a vial of blood drawn or every haircut or toenail clipping from a saint prior to their death wouldn't be a first class relic. christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/63868/… – Peter Turner May 31 '18 at 14:54
  • Good call creating a new question! To clarify, I don't know for sure how the hair is found; finding it among his other clothes were merely a guess on my part. – Thunderforge May 31 '18 at 19:31

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.