3

And whoever speaks a word against the Son of Man will be forgiven, but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.

Matthew 12:32 (ESV)

Catholicism teaches that purgatory is "a place where the soul is cleansed of unforgiven venial sin" (source).

Based on the New Testament, forgiveness of sins done by those who are "in Christ" is received through confession and from it, cleansing from all unrighteousness ensues.

If we confess our sins, he is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.

1 John 1:9 (ESV)

If forgiveness on earth is received through confession, then, forgiveness in purgatory is received through what?

  • My understanding is that Catholics are not required to confess venial sin to their priest. I presume that means they remain unforgiven. – disciple Aug 15 '15 at 14:14
  • @disciple no, it's just any accumulated venial sin since their last confession that requires "cleansing". That said, I'm not really prepared to give a complete answer just now. – Matt Gutting Aug 15 '15 at 14:20
  • 1
    Purgatory, in traditional Catholic doctrine, is not about forgiveness but about purification. – lonesomeday Aug 15 '15 at 15:06
3

The means of any forgiveness is penance. The following is taken from the Catechism of the Catholic Church:

ARTICLE 4: THE SACRAMENT OF PENANCE AND RECONCILIATION

1422 Those who approach the sacrament of Penance obtain pardon from God's mercy for the offense committed against him, and are, at the same time, reconciled with the Church which they have wounded by their sins and which by charity, by example, and by prayer labors for their conversion.

Aquinas notes the following:

Punishment is proportionate to sin. Now sin comprises two things. First, there is the turning away from the immutable good, which is infinite, wherefore, in this respect, sin is infinite. Secondly, there is the inordinate turning to mutable good. In this respect sin is finite, both because the mutable good itself is finite, and because the movement of turning towards it is finite, since the acts of a creature cannot be infinite. Accordingly, in so far as sin consists in turning away from something, its corresponding punishment is the "pain of loss," which also is infinite, because it is the loss of the infinite good, i.e. God. But in so far as sin turns inordinately to something, its corresponding punishment is the "pain of sense," which is also finite.

When man sins mortally, they enact a debt both infinite and finite (if they commit venial sins, they enact only the latter). The infinite debt for our sins has the opportunity to be overlooked in the penance Christ offers for original sin. But the finite punishment is still existent, and even necessary in the process of attaining salvation. The finite punishment is still relevant to the human condition, and through Christ's penance, it is made to be satisfactory in nature (meaning the finite punishment can achieve merits as founded in the perfect and primary merits Christ achieved through His own penance on the cross). The finite punishment, as far as it is satisfactory, and thus voluntary, is a specific type of penance, the other being confession.

So believing in Christ, which includes confession, is certainly the primary means of penance, but the other half consists of a different kind of penance, namely the willingness to go through finite punishment in order to discipline and reshape the fallen finite aspect of our will. The fullness of our will, in other words, even after asking for forgiveness, is still subject to sin and its tendencies. Though we ask for forgiveness, we are still imperfect creatures, not in a judicial sense, but in a practical sense. Thus is it that although we can be justified solely in perfect contrition or more commonly in the forgiveness achieved through the priesthood from God, further penance is required for our will to be fully aligned to God, which is itself salvation. And thus is it that Catholics firmly assert purgatory is not a place/process of opportunity for any souls to gain the 'judicial ticket' of entering heaven which can only be gained by believing in Christ on earth, but rather is a process in which the aspects of the imperfect soul becomes cleansed 'as through fire' before entering heaven (1 Corinthians 3:15). Purgatory is a process for the already elected Church; it is not a process for those who are not of the elect at the moment of death. It is a process for the elected Church (those with no unforgiven mortal sins) to have purged their unforgiven venial sins through finite punishment. So the Catechism states:

ARTICLE 12: "I BELIEVE IN LIFE EVERLASTING"

1022 Each man receives his eternal retribution in his immortal soul at the very moment of his death, in a particular judgment that refers his life to Christ: either entrance into the blessedness of heaven-through a purification or immediately,-- or immediate and everlasting damnation

...and...

1030 All who die in God's grace and friendship, but still imperfectly purified, are indeed assured of their eternal salvation; but after death they undergo purification, so as to achieve the holiness necessary to enter the joy of heaven.

...and finally...

1031 The Church gives the name Purgatory to this final purification of the elect, which is entirely different from the punishment of the damned. The Church formulated her doctrine of faith on Purgatory especially at the Councils of Florence and Trent. The tradition of the Church, by reference to certain texts of Scripture, speaks of a cleansing fire.

AN ANALOGY

The idea that it is necessary for souls to go through finite punishment consists in an understanding of the nature of sin and what is truly meant by 'punishment'. In sinning, man offends God by not offering all of the obedience that is rightly due to God. So, while infinite punishment has no opportunity of being satisfactory because it is involuntarily gone through, finite punishment does have the opportunity of being satisfactory, both because of the penance of Christ and because souls can willingly choose to enter it. This still doesn't address why the punishment itself gains merits. And the point here is to realize that 'punishment' in its most basic sense is actually the satisfaction made for a debt of sin, which robs God of the obedience He is owed. In short, 'punishment' is simply a thing that engenders greater obedience. Think about a court case. Let's say a man has committed a crime that at least deserves a minimal retribution, but which also deserves prison in life. If the man deemed guilty of this crime enters his punishment willingly, he is thus complying to the will of the judge himself, and to some degree making his own satisfaction. Of course, the ultimate end of being locked in the jailhouse forever can only be justly prevented if there is one who makes full satisfaction for the man's debts, which the guilty himself cannot do. For in entering the punishment of imprisonment for life, the man can gain nothing of it for himself, since he shall in no case be freed. Thus satosfaction cannot be made for his own life through himself, where satosfaction could be made for his own life if he were free. So one who is perfect and greater than the law itself must make satisfaction for the guilty. So a benefactor who decides to take mercy on the guilty man pays for his release at the cost of his own luxury. But the man guilty of breaking the law can still offer something, and indeed must offer something, if he is to share in the satisfaction made for him through his benefactor. If he doesn't, than he refuses to partake in the same spirit that is of the satisfaction made for him, and so he is still condemned by his own doing. The guilty man must go through rehabilitation and actually allow this sacrifice to change his own behavior and tendencies. He must go through the minimal punishment that he is actually able to go through to make satisfaction as a productive and free man. If not, than he is not offering the full obedience thay is owed to God, and so defeating the very purpose for which he was freed from the fate of prison. This analogy is meant to display the nature of Christ and the nature of the penance we must offer in light of Christ's sacrifice. Just like the guilty lawbreaker, if we do not offer whatever we can in our own way and turn away from our sins, than we are not fully in union with God. This entire process is what is going on in penance, both in confession and in finite punishment. Confession is the admitting of our faults and recognizing the sacrifice made for us, while finite punishment is the going through rehabilitation and adjusting our behavior in order that the entirety of our will is made righteous, which is what is owed to our benefactor.

CONCLUSION

So the answer is both basic and complicated. The souls have been forgiven of mortal sins that are in purgatory (hence their existence in purgatory rather than in hell). They are not going through a means of 'forgiveness', which is only one form of penance (the more primary, albeit), but are going through another form of penance just as necessary for the attainment of salvation; finite punishment. It is this punishment that is necessary for the means of amending the debts of venial and otherwise imperfect tendencies. Christ did not abolish finite punishment for the believer as he did eternal punishment; he allowed it the opportunity of being satisfactory. It is this satisfactory punishment that souls in purgatory go through in order to achieve the merit of perfection, not in judicial terms (which is achieved through Christ), but in active terms (which is existent within the free, independent will of the person).

  • If "the means of any forgiveness is penance" ,then, is there a penance in the after life? How does Matthew 12:32 fit with the concept of penance? – Radz C. Brown Aug 17 '15 at 8:48
  • 'Forgiveness' is a state of justification. In some regard, those in purgatory are already forgiven, specifically of their mortal sins. So those in purgatory have not 'spoken against the Holy Spirit'. They just have other sins and imperfect tendencies that remain. The other half of penance involves the finite punishment that is necesarry to garner the complete obedience due to God. – Jecko Aug 17 '15 at 11:42
  • @Jecko This is a good answer, actually a great answer, I was wondering why however the term "Sanctification" is not used in it. Is not Purgatory a final sactification of a soul destined for heaven? The Term Purgatory, isn't it a final sactification for the Christian who who does not become fully sactified during his life. Isn't our Christian walk that same Purgation prior to death? I ask this to clearify for our seperated brothers who believe they are fully sanctified through faith, yet who still embrace sin, even choose it, believing falsly that they are already forgiven. – Marc Aug 17 '15 at 12:34
  • @Mark Yes, that's a good point that perhaps adds clarity to the nature of what is meant by 'purgatory'. I didn't include the use of the word 'sanctification' because it never really crossed my mind. This answer was focusing more so on the nature of penance and the core philisophical notions that formulate all understanding regarding what 'purgatory' and 'sanctification' are to begin with. Where clarity in simplicity is perhaps sacrificed, I think the answer affords more insight. – Jecko Aug 17 '15 at 21:57

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.