What are examples of Latter-day Saint doctrines that are NOT completely based on the Bible?

Question

What are examples of Latter-day Saint doctrines that cannot possibly be inferred from reading the Bible only, but require additional sources in order to be established?

Note (in response to downvotes): if a statement about reality lacks a Biblical basis, it doesn't follow that the statement is necessarily false. Electromagnetism, Quantum Mechanics, String Theory, Astronomy, Cosmology, Mathematics, Computer Science, Medicine, Biology and a whole lot of other scientifically acquired knowledge lack a Biblical basis, but this mere fact doesn't invalidate them or make them false. I'm not questioning the truthfulness of LDS doctrines. I'm just curious about which ones lack a Biblical basis.

What counts as "the Bible"? I'm open to answers based on any of the Biblical canons listed in this Wikipedia article.

---

Related: According to proponents of Sola Scriptura, what are examples of logical contradictions between doctrines from the Bible and LDS sacred books?

Answer 1

You can basically take Doctrine & Covenants, and put that on the table. While there are of course doctrines that also appear in the Bible (and many came to be because Joseph was working with the Bible and had questions), Doctrine & Covenants is explicitely modern revelation, so for any practices and doctrines based on that, regardless of whether there is also Biblical support, we should consider that as explicit commandments for our time, clearly meant for us now.

Some examples of Latter-Day Saint doctrines that are either explicitely modern (so no pretense that the basis is an interpretation of the Bible) or the Bible is at the very most implying:

• Word of Wisdom (D&C 89) (abstain from alcohol, tea, coffee) - explicitely modern commandment
• Tithing (D&C 119) - while tithing is mentioned in the Bible, here we have explicitely how much tithing should be in the modern church
• Sacrament prayers (D&C 20:75-79) - it is never mentioned in the Bible with what words sacrament was blessed
• the Church organization - while offices are named in the Bible, one can't really say with a straight face that the Bible tells us how to organize the church. Modern revelation is necessary here for constant adaptation where necessary.
• Water to be substituted for wine in the sacrament (D&C 27) - explicitely modern
• When Christ was among the Dead, he organized the righteous to minister to the unrighteous, he didn't necessarily do it himself (D&C 138) - modern revelation expanding on what is in the Bible

Answer 2

General view -- outside perspective

It is commonplace for Christians to conclude that theological views they do not personally believe are theological views without a Biblical basis. This would be true whether the rejected theological views were held by Latter-day Saints or non-Latter-day Saints.

The formal argument representing this implicit belief is as follows:

P1: If it had a Biblical basis, I would believe it

P2: I don't believe it

C1: It does not have a Biblical basis.

(I readily acknowledge there are some Christians willing to admit Biblical ambiguity on at least some matters; such individuals graciously exhibit charity to those who disagree with them, and would not accept P1 above)

--

General view -- inside perspective

To a Latter-day Saint, rejecting a theological view because it is found in other sacred texts, but not clearly found in the Bible, would be like asking a Protestant to reject theological views which are found in the epistles of Paul but not in the 4 Gospels.

(one could also imagine a stipulation that all New Testament doctrines must have an Old Testament basis in order to be accepted--there was real, historical debate on that matter; or that the only statements in the Gospels that should be accepted as true are those found in whichever Gospel was written first)

Sometimes those who are less-favorably-disposed towards The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints consider it a accomplishment to elicit Latter-day Saint acknowledgement that they believe things that are not found in the Bible. Since all of us believe things that are not found in the Bible, this isn't much of an accomplishment. Furthermore, it fundamentally misunderstands Latter-day Saint beliefs about scripture.

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints accepts the Bible, the Book of Mormon, the Doctrine & Covenants, and the Pearl of Great Price as canonical scripture (going forward I will refer to the latter 3 as "the texts of the Restoration"). There is no requirement that a statement must appear in all 4 in order to be true.

A number of things Latter-day Saints believe are found only in the Bible--these principles are not rejected because they are not found in the texts of the Restoration. Likewise, principals taught only in the texts of the Restoration are not rejected because they are absent from the Bible.

Let us consider the following sets (further subsets could be created but are unnecessary to make the point):

• Set A: teachings found only in the Bible
• Set B: teachings found only in the texts of the Restoration
• Set C: teachings found in both the Bible and the texts of the Restoration

Anything in set B or set C would be examples fitting the OP's criteria: What are examples of Latter-day Saint doctrines that are NOT completely based on the Bible?

--

Examples

For sake of space, I will provide just 2 examples for each set.

Set A:

The Nativity accounts of Jesus (including choirs of angels, shepherds, magi, etc.); Jesus' testimony to Mary in John 20:17.

Set B:

The infinite & eternal nature of Jesus' atoning sacrifice, as taught in Alma 34:8-16; Moroni's promise of the revelation of truth, as taught in Moroni 10:3-7.

Set C:

We'll start with an uncontroversial example: Jesus rose bodily from the dead--this is clearly taught in the Bible and the texts of the Restoration.

Many teachings that Latter-day Saints believe exist in Set C are considered controversial by other Christian faiths. For example, the pre-mortal existence of humanity. This is undoubtedly taught in Alma 13 & Abraham 3 (texts of the Restoration); however, Latter-day Saints also see evidence of this doctrine in the Bible (e.g. Job 38:7, Jeremiah 1:5, Eccl. 12:7, John 9:2, 2 Tim. 1:9, etc.). In this case, a doctrine taught in the Bible is given clarity and additional concrete detail via texts of the Restoration.

--

The Relevant Latter-day Saint Theology

We believe all that God has revealed, all that He does now reveal, and we believe that He will yet reveal many great and important things pertaining to the Kingdom of God. (Articles of Faith 1:9)

We reject the claim that God's silence on a matter in the past (or humanity's loss of something He said in the past) imposes any restriction on God's ability to speak in the future.

---

Disclaimer: these views are the product of my own study and do not constitute official statements by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints

Answer 3

The accuracy of the entire history described in the Book of Mormon are doctrines of the Latter-day Saints church. this includes the voyage of Lehi, the existence of pre-Columbian Judeo-Christian civilizations and their descriptions, the subsequent conflicts and the hiding and of the Book of Mormon are all doctrines. None of these can be shown from the Bible.

The veracity of Joseph Smith's account of the finding and translation of the book and the status of Joseph Smith as a prophet are also doctrines without biblical support. Similarly the "corruption" of all the other churches in the world is a doctrine that cannot be specifically demonstrated from the Bible.