Skip to main content
9 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Sep 15, 2022 at 6:55 history edited curiousdannii
edited tags
Sep 15, 2022 at 4:19 comment added Michael16 Maverick, that's illogical and against the Roman creeds. See Monarchy of the Father. The Son is a created or begotten being acc to them, temporarily begotten, not being begotten.
Sep 14, 2022 at 19:05 comment added Maverick One important thing is not to put the past tense into it. "Begotten" is not something that happened in the past. "Eternally begotten." So we didn't have Father being alone and generating the Son. But He is (not was) the source of the Son.
Sep 14, 2022 at 14:19 answer added VNPython timeline score: -1
Sep 13, 2022 at 21:26 answer added Dan Fefferman timeline score: 3
Apr 19, 2022 at 13:14 comment added Mike Borden I think the answer would be no since it would entail a change in God's nature to start out Unitarian and "become" something else.
Aug 10, 2021 at 15:35 answer added user54757 timeline score: 2
Aug 10, 2021 at 14:41 review Close votes
Aug 13, 2021 at 6:24
Aug 10, 2021 at 10:14 history asked Michael16 CC BY-SA 4.0