Skip to main content
replaced http://christianity.stackexchange.com/ with https://christianity.stackexchange.com/
Source Link

This answerThis answer confused me. I tried wading through the sources, but then I decided I'd just ask here. According to Catholic dogma:

  • Was Peter ever in Rome? I'm sure the answer is yes, but I'd like to see sources.

  • Was Peter a "bishop"? If so, what does that mean in Peter's case?

  • Was there a shift during the first two centuries in the structure of the church government at Rome, from a "college of presbyters" to a monarchical bishop? If so, how did that shift come about?

  • Did Peter die in Rome?

To be clear on what kinds of sources I'm looking for, here's what I expect to see for each bullet point:

  1. An appeal to the infallible sacred magisterium, or an indication that the answer hasn't been infallibly/dogmatically given to the church.

  2. If it hasn't been dogmatically defined, then an appeal to the ordinary magisterium.

  3. If the ordinary magisterium is unclear or inconclusive on a certain point, I'd like that fact to be spelled out in the answer. If that's the case, I'd like an overview of Catholic approaches to the issue.

This answer confused me. I tried wading through the sources, but then I decided I'd just ask here. According to Catholic dogma:

  • Was Peter ever in Rome? I'm sure the answer is yes, but I'd like to see sources.

  • Was Peter a "bishop"? If so, what does that mean in Peter's case?

  • Was there a shift during the first two centuries in the structure of the church government at Rome, from a "college of presbyters" to a monarchical bishop? If so, how did that shift come about?

  • Did Peter die in Rome?

To be clear on what kinds of sources I'm looking for, here's what I expect to see for each bullet point:

  1. An appeal to the infallible sacred magisterium, or an indication that the answer hasn't been infallibly/dogmatically given to the church.

  2. If it hasn't been dogmatically defined, then an appeal to the ordinary magisterium.

  3. If the ordinary magisterium is unclear or inconclusive on a certain point, I'd like that fact to be spelled out in the answer. If that's the case, I'd like an overview of Catholic approaches to the issue.

This answer confused me. I tried wading through the sources, but then I decided I'd just ask here. According to Catholic dogma:

  • Was Peter ever in Rome? I'm sure the answer is yes, but I'd like to see sources.

  • Was Peter a "bishop"? If so, what does that mean in Peter's case?

  • Was there a shift during the first two centuries in the structure of the church government at Rome, from a "college of presbyters" to a monarchical bishop? If so, how did that shift come about?

  • Did Peter die in Rome?

To be clear on what kinds of sources I'm looking for, here's what I expect to see for each bullet point:

  1. An appeal to the infallible sacred magisterium, or an indication that the answer hasn't been infallibly/dogmatically given to the church.

  2. If it hasn't been dogmatically defined, then an appeal to the ordinary magisterium.

  3. If the ordinary magisterium is unclear or inconclusive on a certain point, I'd like that fact to be spelled out in the answer. If that's the case, I'd like an overview of Catholic approaches to the issue.

Tweeted twitter.com/#!/StackChristian/status/620906668658946048
edited tags
Link
curiousdannii
  • 20.9k
  • 14
  • 62
  • 130
Source Link
Mr. Bultitude
  • 15.4k
  • 7
  • 81
  • 133

What exactly is Peter's connection to Rome according to Catholic dogma?

This answer confused me. I tried wading through the sources, but then I decided I'd just ask here. According to Catholic dogma:

  • Was Peter ever in Rome? I'm sure the answer is yes, but I'd like to see sources.

  • Was Peter a "bishop"? If so, what does that mean in Peter's case?

  • Was there a shift during the first two centuries in the structure of the church government at Rome, from a "college of presbyters" to a monarchical bishop? If so, how did that shift come about?

  • Did Peter die in Rome?

To be clear on what kinds of sources I'm looking for, here's what I expect to see for each bullet point:

  1. An appeal to the infallible sacred magisterium, or an indication that the answer hasn't been infallibly/dogmatically given to the church.

  2. If it hasn't been dogmatically defined, then an appeal to the ordinary magisterium.

  3. If the ordinary magisterium is unclear or inconclusive on a certain point, I'd like that fact to be spelled out in the answer. If that's the case, I'd like an overview of Catholic approaches to the issue.