Timeline for Why do people interpret "Lucifer" as being Satan in Isaiah 14?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
19 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 31, 2020 at 5:16 | answer | added | Bill Porter | timeline score: -1 | |
| Jul 11, 2017 at 22:36 | answer | added | Echeneis Lodestone | timeline score: 2 | |
| Aug 31, 2015 at 16:29 | comment | added | Dɑvïd | See now on BH.SE: "Why is Isaiah 14:12-15 interpreted by some to refer to Satan?" | |
| May 29, 2015 at 3:29 | history | edited | curiousdannii♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| May 29, 2015 at 0:13 | history | edited | Mr. Bultitude | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Made the title match the body.
|
| May 28, 2015 at 18:55 | review | Close votes | |||
| May 29, 2015 at 0:13 | |||||
| Aug 4, 2014 at 14:52 | comment | added | The Freemason | Please see this question for the logic behind my response. Your question should be down voted for "lack of research with some other translations first" - per Wikis. "A) Use a Bible in a language you speak and B) use a dictionary. Either or both of those things would save you from this sort of misunderstanding." - per Caleb. Lucifer isn't the devil or Satan. | |
| Oct 13, 2011 at 15:51 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackChristian/status/124512547557752832 | ||
| Oct 13, 2011 at 12:36 | comment | added | Caleb | @DavidStratton: If you are looking for doctrinal answers about the nature of Satan (even ones defended through exegesis) it is definitely ok to ask that here. The BH site is great, but focuses more on the text and less on the resulting doctrine/applications. | |
| Oct 13, 2011 at 2:55 | vote | accept | David Stratton | ||
| Oct 13, 2011 at 1:29 | comment | added | El'endia Starman | That's perfectly fine! :) | |
| Oct 12, 2011 at 23:16 | comment | added | David Stratton | I wasn't aware of that site. I posed the question because the identity of Satan/Lucifer is a question of doctrine. There is enough disagreement on whether Satan is real or figurative that I thought it was worth asking. Much of the preaching and teaching that I've been exposed to about Satan's characteristics present him as a real being, and refer back to these verses to show his nature, and reason for rebelling against God. In short, to me it is important doctrinally to be correct. | |
| Oct 12, 2011 at 22:55 | comment | added | El'endia Starman | This question actually seems like it could go better on the BiblicalHermeneutics.SE site. However, that mostly depends on what you want. Do you want strict exegesis (BH.SE) or can there be some doctrine involved (C.SE)? | |
| Oct 12, 2011 at 13:34 | answer | added | Narnian | timeline score: 10 | |
| Oct 12, 2011 at 12:50 | answer | added | jchaffee | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 12, 2011 at 5:13 | history | edited | Flimzy | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Add translation reference and links
|
| Oct 12, 2011 at 4:25 | answer | added | Mason Wheeler♦ | timeline score: 7 | |
| Oct 12, 2011 at 4:20 | history | edited | David Stratton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Oct 12, 2011 at 4:13 | history | asked | David Stratton | CC BY-SA 3.0 |