Timeline for Corrupted incorruptible saints (Catholicism)
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 21 at 1:51 | comment | added | yters | I guess the other part of what I'm getting at here is if "incorruptible" means "not as corrupted as expected", then why the effort on the part of the Catholic church to artificially hide or delay natural corruption of the "incorruptibles"? This seems highly suspicious. | |
| Nov 20 at 14:06 | answer | added | Wyrsa | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 20 at 13:04 | comment | added | eques | Padre Pio is not considered to be totally incorrupt. Only part of his body shows incorruptibility. | |
| Nov 20 at 13:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jul 23 at 12:07 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
| Jun 23 at 11:39 | history | edited | yters | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Reputable source padre pio is corrupted
|
| Jun 23 at 11:34 | history | edited | yters | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Example
|
| Jun 22 at 23:04 | comment | added | Ray Butterworth | As presented here, "their bodies have clearly corrupted", "hide the corruption", "the case of Padre Pio", etc. are all unsubstantiated statements. The question would be greatly improved by including explicit quotations from reputable sources about each claim. | |
| Jun 22 at 22:31 | answer | added | Ken Graham♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jun 22 at 19:50 | history | asked | yters | CC BY-SA 4.0 |