Timeline for How can a reasonable faith be placed in the Being that inspired the Bible if it is "inspired" but not "inerrant"?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 5 at 18:55 | comment | added | Dottard | @MikeBorden - Q1: Paul specifically addresses that when he says that the church will always have the gift of prophecy. Q2: I prefer the most literal translations because I want to know precisely what the prophet said. | |
| Apr 5 at 13:46 | comment | added | Mike Borden | Thank you. Two additional questions for clarification, if I may? 1) If "further prophets could arise that, while not adding to Scripture, could still have relevant messages" is the case, isn't that a distinction between OT and NT prophesy?, 2) Since it seems you prefer inspiration method #2 do you also prefer 'thought for thought' translations like NIV over 'word for word' translations like NASB? | |
| Apr 4 at 20:49 | comment | added | Dottard | @MikeBorden - correct - I make no distinction - it is the same Holy Spirit | |
| Apr 4 at 13:08 | comment | added | Mike Borden | Do you make no distinction between the nature of OT and NT prophesy? | |
| Dec 3, 2023 at 20:10 | history | answered | Dottard | CC BY-SA 4.0 |