Timeline for How do proponents of the Fine Tuning argument for God, refute the puddle comparison?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2023 at 14:14 | comment | added | RBarryYoung | The fact remains that all of the scientific evidence that we have supports the fine-tuning argument and no evidence supports the puddle argument. And the fine-tuning argument is accepted among scientists as an unresolved question. The puddle argument is not because it is not even a valid analogy, let alone a scientific hypothesis. | |
| Feb 2, 2023 at 14:13 | comment | added | Ray Butterworth | @GuyG, I wasn't claiming that statement's validity. Notice that my very next sentence contains "this conclusion is just as ridiculous as the idea that the hole's shape was determined by the puddle". | |
| Feb 2, 2023 at 11:25 | comment | added | Guy G | "Scientifically, we must conclude that the Universe had the correct values right from its beginning, so it must have been designed to support life." - this suggests that the idea that the universe was designed to support life is scientifically accepted, when it is not. It's not even a scientific statement, given that it's not falsifiable. | |
| S Feb 1, 2023 at 13:51 | history | mod moved comments to chat | |||
| S Feb 1, 2023 at 13:51 | comment | added | curiousdannii♦ | Comments have been moved to chat; please do not continue the discussion here. Before posting a comment below this one, please review the purposes of comments. Comments that do not request clarification or suggest improvements usually belong as an answer, on Christianity Meta, or in Christianity Chat. Comments continuing discussion may be removed. | |
| Feb 1, 2023 at 2:49 | history | edited | Ray Butterworth | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 17 characters in body
|
| Feb 1, 2023 at 1:50 | history | edited | Ray Butterworth | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Add explicit examples of fine tuning.
|
| Jan 31, 2023 at 17:00 | history | edited | Ray Butterworth | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Significant rewrite.
|
| Jan 31, 2023 at 4:56 | history | answered | Ray Butterworth | CC BY-SA 4.0 |