Skip to main content
14 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jan 13, 2023 at 0:21 comment added M__ @JohnBollinger I work with "non-analytical" experts and their intuition can be astonishing.
Jan 9, 2023 at 21:39 comment added John Bollinger Well yes, if the prediction was an informed / intuitive one at all, then it was an outlier prediction. But if we take the prediction as such then hitting the score exactly (if we even interpret the prediction that way; if it was even made before the game was played) cannot be considered anything other than a lucky happenstance. But the usual caveats about fortune telling should also be raised, such as about vague language subject to multiple interpretations, and about cherry picking predictions that turn out to after the fact be interpretable as correct.
Jan 9, 2023 at 20:52 comment added M__ Its a welcome comment @JohnBollinger, but it's still possible. What you are saying is technically called an "outlier". Therefore, what's going on is outlier prediction.
Jan 9, 2023 at 20:37 comment added John Bollinger I am highly skeptical of the claim that Jones received supernatural foreknowledge of any part of the outcome of the 1985 World Series, but I also don't find it plausible to attribute a correct prediction of the winning team's final score in a high-scoring baseball game to intuition / informed good guessing. An 11-run score is pretty far outside the norm in baseball today, and it was even more so in 1985. Nobody's intuition predicts that, no matter how well trained.
Jan 9, 2023 at 16:42 history edited M__ CC BY-SA 4.0
edited body
Jan 9, 2023 at 16:34 history edited M__ CC BY-SA 4.0
added 409 characters in body
Jan 9, 2023 at 16:15 history edited M__ CC BY-SA 4.0
added 195 characters in body
Jan 9, 2023 at 16:03 history edited M__ CC BY-SA 4.0
added 316 characters in body
Jan 9, 2023 at 15:56 history edited M__ CC BY-SA 4.0
added 316 characters in body
Jan 9, 2023 at 15:46 history edited M__ CC BY-SA 4.0
added 57 characters in body
Jan 9, 2023 at 15:44 comment added M__ @PeterTurner I have updated the post accordingly. I prefer to avoid professional background, but to answer your critique I'll make an exception.
Jan 9, 2023 at 15:40 history edited M__ CC BY-SA 4.0
added 1533 characters in body
Jan 9, 2023 at 14:34 comment added Peter Turner I think this question should address the particular people involved in the question and not be answered in a general way.
Jan 9, 2023 at 8:44 history answered M__ CC BY-SA 4.0