Timeline for According to proponents of Sola Scriptura, what are examples of logical contradictions between doctrines from the Bible and LDS sacred books?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2022 at 21:02 | comment | added | KorvinStarmast | Sola Scriptura is solidly grounded in rigorous biblical exegesis except for the fact that it excludes 7 books of Scriptura 😉 (But that won't get resolved here) | |
| Feb 1, 2022 at 14:52 | comment | added | Anne | @Spirit Realm Investigator Certainly not. That closed Q only had one non-answer of about 6 lines. If you want answers about Sola Scriptura in relation to LDS disbelief in that, I suggest you post a fresh Q. | |
| Feb 1, 2022 at 14:26 | comment | added | user50422 | "Sola Scriptura is solidly grounded in rigorous biblical exegesis" - Are you referring to this question: What is the Biblical Basis for Sola Scriptura? | |
| Feb 1, 2022 at 14:22 | comment | added | Anne | @Spirit Realm Investigator Sola Scriptura is solidly grounded in rigorous biblical exegesis, so the LDS Article of Faith 1.8 is a direct contradiction of that. To now ask "what is the rigorous biblical exegesis that substantiates Sola Scriptura" is to ask a different Q to this one. It's as if the logical impasse my example raises has prompted you to demonstrate that very point by your additional 'requirements' and proposed examples. | |
| Feb 1, 2022 at 14:14 | comment | added | user50422 | Then you need to read more carefully. My question asked from the very beginning are there any doctrines solidly grounded in rigorous biblical exegesis that are in direct logical contradiction to well-established LDS doctrines derived from their holy books? What is the rigorous biblical exegesis that substantiates Sola Scriptura? Can you quote specific verses? | |
| Feb 1, 2022 at 14:09 | comment | added | Anne | @Spirit Realm Investigator You only added that list of what you are looking for 2 hours after I posted my edit. I protest! I am not here to form answers in accordance with the POs perception of what kind of answers are prefered. My two examples are relevant. If you or others disagree, do so and mark my answer down if you like, and certainly don't select it as your chosen answer, but I am not going to mold by answer around ever-changing parameters of a fluid question. | |
| Feb 1, 2022 at 14:03 | comment | added | user50422 | Anne, I added a note at the end of my question about Sola Scriptura and the kind of contradictions I'm looking for. | |
| Feb 1, 2022 at 11:55 | history | edited | Anne | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Requested by OP to provide an[other] example
|
| Feb 1, 2022 at 11:50 | comment | added | Anne | @Spirit Realm Investigator The example I have provided seems to be the elephant in the room, here. The LDS teaching stated in that Article of Faith 1.8 shows direct opposition to Sola Scriptura. Perhaps LDS people, who don't believe in Sola Scriptura, would dismiss that, yet the logical run-on question, "Why must we have additional, written revelation/doctrines?" might need the answer, "Because we have some doctrines that clash with orthodoxly Christian, biblical doctrine." I've already given an example but I’ll add a second one at the end of my answer. | |
| Jan 31, 2022 at 15:26 | comment | added | user50422 | @Anne - I edited the OP to add emphasis on my interest in concrete examples. I hope it doesn't invalidate your answer too much. | |
| Jan 31, 2022 at 12:41 | history | answered | Anne | CC BY-SA 4.0 |