Skip to main content
7 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jun 5, 2021 at 17:01 comment added Hold To The Rod @OneGodtheFather re your 2nd comment, I personally believe the Son of God is a Divine nomenclature. For purposes of this post I tried not to over-specify Clement's words. I don't think his statement here explicitly affirms or denies the Deity of Christ, so I was trying not to put words in his mouth.
Jun 5, 2021 at 16:50 comment added Only True God Asked this here, FYI christianity.stackexchange.com/questions/83501/…
Jun 5, 2021 at 16:47 comment added Hold To The Rod @OneGodtheFather re Ignatius, that's a fair rebuttal. I modified my statement on Ignatius slightly. I suppose the stronger, original statement I made on Ignatius (which I do stand by =) ) would call for a more extensive argument to back it up. Probably a discussion for another post.
Jun 5, 2021 at 16:41 history edited Hold To The Rod CC BY-SA 4.0
added 10 characters in body
Jun 5, 2021 at 15:49 comment added Only True God "We believe in God the Father and His Son Jesus Christ" Is this paraphrase intended to include Jesus as God, or does 'God' here apply to just the Father?
Jun 5, 2021 at 4:56 comment added Only True God +1 Re Ignatius to Ephesians 7, there are perhaps two important points in rebuttal. 1. The Long Rescension version of this text has a context that makes a straightforward understanding of 7 as equating Jesus with God problematic ("But our Physician is the Only true God, the unbegotten and unapproachable, the Lord of all, the Father and Begetter of the only-begotten Son.") 2. There is a question of the proper understanding of Ignatius' use of theos - was it 'god' as in Moses, angels, and judges (Jesus compares Himself to these 'gods')? Or is it 'God' as in the Almighty God?
Jun 5, 2021 at 2:01 history answered Hold To The Rod CC BY-SA 4.0