Timeline for Do all believers receive the Holy Spirit at conversion but only a few are filled with the Holy Spirit post conversion?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
23 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2022 at 13:29 | history | edited | user50422 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 217 characters in body
|
| Jul 13, 2022 at 6:10 | answer | added | Jays | timeline score: 1 | |
| May 13, 2022 at 12:35 | history | edited | user50422 |
edited tags
|
|
| S Nov 6, 2020 at 2:29 | history | bounty ended | CommunityBot | ||
| S Nov 6, 2020 at 2:29 | history | notice removed | user50422 | ||
| Nov 6, 2020 at 2:28 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Oct 31, 2020 at 1:57 | answer | added | Autodidact | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 29, 2020 at 22:58 | comment | added | curiousdannii♦ | Note: this is an overview question, and your personal interpretation of these passages will not suffice for an answer. | |
| Oct 29, 2020 at 22:57 | history | edited | curiousdannii♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 7 characters in body; edited tags
|
| Oct 29, 2020 at 17:03 | answer | added | SLM | timeline score: 2 | |
| Oct 29, 2020 at 15:41 | answer | added | Ken Graham♦ | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 29, 2020 at 13:00 | answer | added | steveowen | timeline score: 0 | |
| Oct 29, 2020 at 12:06 | comment | added | Mike Borden | Ephesians 5:18 says we should (literally) "be being filled" with the Holy Spirit. This indicates that being filled is not a one time event. The distinction you are investigating might be as simple as a leaky bucket having access to a spigot versus repeatedly going to the spigot. Access is a one time gift while availing oneself of that access is moment by moment. "Abide in me other wise you can't do anything", Jesus said. "Walk in the Spirit not the flesh", said Paul. | |
| Oct 29, 2020 at 5:09 | comment | added | Pieter Rousseau | @NigelJ Nigel, my experience is that to explain away the difficulty of the differences the OP is identifying, those that reject the Baptism of the Holy Ghost as a distinctly separate event after regeneration envoke the "historical narrative" argument to argue away the use of Acts to establish or challenge doctrine. So for the OP to make that distinction in his question, will mean he has to start with that premise. You could, however, answer his question by demonstrating that by starting with that premise the conflict is resolved, hence defending a specific "denominational dependent" view. | |
| S Oct 29, 2020 at 3:58 | history | bounty started | CommunityBot | ||
| S Oct 29, 2020 at 3:58 | history | notice added | user50422 | Draw attention | |
| Oct 27, 2020 at 22:22 | history | edited | user50422 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Added Acts 10:44-46 (Cornelius and his household) as another example
|
| Oct 27, 2020 at 15:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackChristian/status/1321104378569412610 | ||
| Oct 27, 2020 at 13:01 | history | became hot network question | |||
| Oct 27, 2020 at 3:13 | comment | added | Nigel J | This question needs to distinguish between the conditions existing during the transition period (covered by the historical narrative in Acts) as the baptism of John (the baptism of repentance) was fully replaced by baptism into the body of Christ (which baptism fully incorporates all that is represented within John's baptism), during which transition one needs to discern a more complex condition than that which (generally) prevails today. In that transition period there may appear to be separate events, whereas now those events will be (usually) simultaneous. (Up-voted +1.) | |
| Oct 27, 2020 at 0:37 | answer | added | Dottard | timeline score: 4 | |
| Oct 27, 2020 at 0:29 | history | edited | user50422 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 91 characters in body
|
| Oct 27, 2020 at 0:24 | history | asked | user50422 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |