In several books (incl. those written by atheists) there is the statement that Christianity gave a boost to science in the West. Allegedly, there are statements in the Christian teaching that promote scientific approach.
What are these statements in Christian literature (specific to Christianity, i. e. not appearing in other religions)?
I only have anecdotal (unconfirmed) evidence.
Example 1: One of the Christian thinkers (Thomas Acquinas?) stated that
- God created the nature,
- the nature works in an ordered way (i. e. is not chaotic), and
- God does not micromanage most of the time (i. e. when he does, it's a miracle; at all other times nature works without divine intervention).
In other words: Gods creates a self-regulating system (like an ocean) once, then it works on its own in an ordered way.
From these statements it follows that it is possible to understand how nature works by finding out the laws that govern them (empirically finding out the nature of the order from step 2).
Example 2: Allegedly, one of the Russian priests once said that Christian teaching does not contradict the theory of evolution. The statement that God created the universe in seven days can be understood as a metaphor (like many parts of the Christian literature). These are not calendar days, but may last for billions of years.
I want to find publicly accessible, verifiable parts of the Christian teaching that support the scientific approach. I am not interested in cases where Christians made scientific discoveries or advanced the science in other ways. Rather, I want to know what parts of Christian literature formed their thinking and allowed to make those discoveries.
Ideally, these statements are peculiar to Christianity (i. e. are not part of Judaism) and do not appear in other religions. I want to find out whether or not the fact that science succeeded most in Christian countries can be attributed to the Christian doctrine (hence if some statement appears in Christianity, Islam, and Judaism, it does not help validate the thesis).
Update 1 (2018-06-15): I will accept an answer that confirms or refutes the statement in example 1 above. That's a good starting point.