Timeline for Which doctrine was formalised first: Infant Baptism or Original Sin?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2018 at 11:12 | comment | added | Ken Graham♦ | @karma Your premise seems correct, except the fact that in the end infant baptism becomes the general norm (practice) and not a doctrine. Infant baptism, like adult baptism is a liturgical sacrament governed by liturgical rules, which was influenced by the concept of original sin. | |
| Apr 29, 2018 at 8:20 | comment | added | karma | Ken Graham, so am I correct if I conclude the situation like this : first there is a Original Sin concept (not as a doctrine yet), that's why Infant Baptism (also not as a doctrine yet) is practiced. Later on, that Original Sin concept turn into a doctrine, consequently the Infant Baptism became a doctrine. Please CMIIW. | |
| Apr 28, 2018 at 15:33 | history | edited | Ken Graham♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Apr 28, 2018 at 15:10 | history | edited | Ken Graham♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 326 characters in body
|
| Apr 28, 2018 at 15:00 | history | answered | Ken Graham♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |