The classic argument I know are the following :

1. Cosmmoogical argument: That every that has a beginning must have a cause.
2. Theological argument: The order and the useful setting in a system imply a intelligence and a finality that did the organization.
3. Ontological argument: That is that the idea of God itself is a proof for the existence of God. How can a finite being image an infinite one?
4. Moral argument: The conscience of the human is the proof to a conscience giver. Or the morality within man, means that there must be a moral law giver.
5. Congruence argument: This argument maintain that the previous argument present the best way to understand the person of God. That the belief in the existence of God is the better way to explain our moral nature, mental and religious, also it is the better way to explain the material universe.

These arguments works together to form one argument. So please don't work with these as 5 singles independent arguments.

The classic arguments I know are the following :

1. Cosmological argument: That every thing that has a beginning must have a cause.
2. Theological argument: The order and the useful setting in a system imply an intelligence and a finality that did the organization.
3. Ontological argument: That the idea of God itself is a proof for the existence of God. How can a finite being imagine an infinite one?
4. Moral argument: The conscience of the human is proof of a conscience giver. Or, the morality within man means that there must be a moral law giver.
5. Congruence argument: This argument maintains that the previous arguments present the best way to understand the person of God. That the belief in the existence of God is the better way to explain our moral nature (mental and religious). Also, it is the better way to explain the material universe.

These arguments work together to form one argument. So please don't work with these as 5 single, independent arguments.