Skip to main content
Christianity

Return to Answer

deleted 102 characters in body
Source Link
Nick Rolando
Nick Rolando
  • 1.8k
  • 1
  • 14
  • 22

We are not necessarily "being punished".

We are not held accountable for their sin. Adam and Eve, our first ancestors, became sinful and we have inherited their sinful nature being born from them. Adam failed where Christ succeeded. That is why we must be "born again". If you got diabetical genes from your parents

God chose perfectly a man and you ended up with diabetes, is therewoman who would represent mankind. Would not reasoning in that? But if your dad stole a carall of us at some point be tempted and God judged you for your dad's sin,have walked in that there is no reasoning, and God will not hold that against you.disobedience?

We are not necessarily "being punished".

We are not held accountable for their sin. Adam and Eve, our first ancestors, became sinful and we have inherited their sinful nature being born from them. Adam failed where Christ succeeded. That is why we must be "born again". If you got diabetical genes from your parents and you ended up with diabetes, is there not reasoning in that? But if your dad stole a car and God judged you for your dad's sin, in that there is no reasoning, and God will not hold that against you.

We are not necessarily "being punished".

We are not held accountable for their sin. Adam and Eve, our first ancestors, became sinful and we have inherited their sinful nature being born from them. Adam failed where Christ succeeded. That is why we must be "born again".

God chose perfectly a man and woman who would represent mankind. Would not all of us at some point be tempted and have walked in disobedience?

edited body
Source Link
Nick Rolando
Nick Rolando
  • 1.8k
  • 1
  • 14
  • 22

We are not necessarily "being punished".

We are not held accountable for their sin. Adam and Eve, our first ancestors, became sinful and we have inherited their sinful traitsnature being born from them. Adam failed where Christ succeeded. That is why we must be "born again". If you got diabetical genes from your parents and you ended up with diabetes, is there not reasoning in that? But if your dad stole a car and God judged you for your dad's sin, in that there is no reasoning, and God will not hold that against you.

We are not necessarily "being punished".

We are not held accountable for their sin. Adam and Eve, our first ancestors, became sinful and we have inherited their sinful traits being born from them. Adam failed where Christ succeeded. That is why we must be "born again". If you got diabetical genes from your parents and you ended up with diabetes, is there not reasoning in that? But if your dad stole a car and God judged you for your dad's sin, in that there is no reasoning, and God will not hold that against you.

We are not necessarily "being punished".

We are not held accountable for their sin. Adam and Eve, our first ancestors, became sinful and we have inherited their sinful nature being born from them. Adam failed where Christ succeeded. That is why we must be "born again". If you got diabetical genes from your parents and you ended up with diabetes, is there not reasoning in that? But if your dad stole a car and God judged you for your dad's sin, in that there is no reasoning, and God will not hold that against you.

Source Link
Nick Rolando
Nick Rolando
  • 1.8k
  • 1
  • 14
  • 22

We are not necessarily "being punished".

We are not held accountable for their sin. Adam and Eve, our first ancestors, became sinful and we have inherited their sinful traits being born from them. Adam failed where Christ succeeded. That is why we must be "born again". If you got diabetical genes from your parents and you ended up with diabetes, is there not reasoning in that? But if your dad stole a car and God judged you for your dad's sin, in that there is no reasoning, and God will not hold that against you.