Timeline for Do Paul and Jesus disagree on homosexuality?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 8:57 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Aug 2, 2012 at 23:00 | comment | added | San Jacinto | @MarcGravell I'm inclined to agree with you, but for a different reason. 1) Your statement is true, and in this respect Christianity is wrong for the unbalance. 2) Much of it stems from the fact that a disproportionately greater number of people are claiming that homosexuality is not wrong than are claiming that plain old adultery is not wrong. | |
| Apr 28, 2012 at 12:23 | comment | added | Marc Gravell | The problem in part here is that much of Christianity gets so much more excited about homosexuality than it does about plain old adultery... | |
| Jan 30, 2012 at 17:37 | comment | added | Affable Geek | @Trig - I reverted your changes because you were incorrectly making a doctrinal point in removing the "physical" impossibility of marriage. The physicality of "one flesh" is impossible in Catholic (and many other) understanding, and hence it is not "an obvious absurdity" | |
| Jan 30, 2012 at 17:33 | history | rollback | Affable Geek |
Rollback to Revision 1
|
|
| Jan 30, 2012 at 17:19 | history | edited | TRiG | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Removed obvious absurdity.
|
| Dec 5, 2011 at 16:28 | comment | added | user1054 | +1 because back then, the thought of homosexual marriage wasn't considered. Although people had relationships with the same sex that today we would consider inappropriate, the thought of marriage (which is a union to create more children) with the same sex wasn't considered at all. | |
| Dec 1, 2011 at 21:22 | history | answered | Peter Turner♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |