Timeline for Is 1 Thessalonians 4:17 the only verse that supports the rapture?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 5, 2012 at 17:34 | comment | added | Nick Rolando | (or might be when He is revealed through the "two witnesses" .. just wanted to add that. God bless) | |
| Apr 24, 2012 at 13:13 | comment | added | Peter Turner♦ | @shredder just to be clear, that's what the New American Bible (Catholic Bible) says as well as the KJV. Yeah, I was pretty much just making stuff up to coincide with the rapture (in the vein of Jenkins/Lehaye). | |
| Apr 23, 2012 at 21:52 | comment | added | Nick Rolando | I don't think these verses are talking about rapture, because given the context (of Noah and Lot) it seems to be referring to the wrath of God being poured out. Also, in most translation it says that day is on the day the Son of Man is revealed, which will not be until He returns. | |
| Nov 30, 2011 at 19:25 | comment | added | Peter Turner♦ | @Richard, yeah I should probably hold off on Bible interpretation, I'm not very well versed in it. I only mentioned these passages because there in the NAB pretty much says SEE THESE FOR MORE INFO ABOUT THE RAPTURE in the footnotes, which I thought was a little odd coming from a tradition that rejects it. | |
| Nov 30, 2011 at 19:19 | history | edited | Peter Turner♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 233 characters in body
|
| Nov 30, 2011 at 19:16 | comment | added | Caleb | @JustinY Not only is there not an error in the last sentence, it's hysterically funny. | |
| Nov 30, 2011 at 19:16 | comment | added | Richard | I don't really have an opinion on the rapture, but I view that last verse differently than some. I see that as an idiom. Still, +1 for the first two passages. | |
| Nov 30, 2011 at 19:06 | comment | added | user23 | Your last sentence has an error; I can't quite tell what you're trying to say | |
| Nov 30, 2011 at 19:04 | history | answered | Peter Turner♦ | CC BY-SA 3.0 |