Skip to main content
8 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Jul 14, 2015 at 20:50 history edited Dick Harfield CC BY-SA 3.0
improve formatting; clarify non-infallibility of Paul's statement
Jul 14, 2015 at 7:52 comment added Dick Harfield I have updated my answer to show some traditions that have found acceptance at various times in the Church, whether or not that acceptance still holds. I have tried to show the evidence FOR Peter in Rome, while being appropriately sceptical of doubtful traditions. In doing so, I have steered clear of the alternative evidence AGAINST Peter in Rome, in which camp I would place the likes of Clement of Rome.
Jul 14, 2015 at 7:48 history edited Dick Harfield CC BY-SA 3.0
added 1587 characters in body
Jul 14, 2015 at 3:53 comment added Dick Harfield @Mr.Beatitude I have to go now, for a while, but when I come back I'll try to tweak my answer in response to Peter's comment and yours. As I said in my earlier comment, much depends on tradition.
Jul 14, 2015 at 3:51 comment added Dick Harfield @PeterTurner Thank you for your first comment. I was trying to provide the Catholic position as objectively as I could, as Mr Beatitude requested. The situation seems to be that Peter in Rome is more tradition than dogma. Although I know a number of popes have asserted that Peter was in Rome, I'm not sure whether to write those assertions up as 'dogma', particularly given the context in some cases.
Jul 14, 2015 at 3:49 comment added Mr. Bultitude I concur with @Peter. There's great info here, and I thank you whole-heartedly for that and for the obvious effort you put into it. A close reading of the answer gives me a pretty good idea of what's dogma and what's not, but I'd really prefer a lot more explicitness about "X is dogma, Y is commonly accepted tradition," etc.
Jul 14, 2015 at 3:42 comment added Peter Turner This looks like a good answer, but don't you think it needs a little more dogma and a little less science?
Jul 14, 2015 at 3:20 history answered Dick Harfield CC BY-SA 3.0