Timeline for Was Jesus crucified naked?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 9, 2021 at 1:25 | history | edited | Ken Graham♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 23 characters in body
|
| Jun 17, 2020 at 8:57 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Nov 24, 2019 at 21:25 | comment | added | Ken Graham♦ | @StephenE.Seale The question does not ask for primary sources, yet asks for what various traditions say on this subject. The Vatican leaves the truth of these revelations to the discretion of the faithful because it is considered private revelation. Even then the revelations in question were not to considered into the deposition of beatification by the Vatican because of the possibility that its’ author may have added things to it. | |
| Apr 13, 2017 at 12:56 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://christianity.stackexchange.com/ with https://christianity.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jul 6, 2016 at 22:48 | comment | added | Stephen E. Seale | I don't mean any disrespect here, but an opinion from someone born in the late 1700s is not a primary source. Anne Catherine Emmerich's experience was of growing up in a farming community and then becoming a nun and then claiming visions and stigmata. Also, what we have of these visions was passed down by Clemens Brentano ten years after she claimed to have the visions, and there are many who believe Brentano fabricated much of what he wrote about these visions. Even the Vatican does not see these writings as authentic. | |
| Feb 10, 2015 at 7:04 | history | answered | user13992 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |