Timeline for Are scientific findings a test to Christians' Faith?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2011 at 8:54 | comment | added | Rex Kerr | @Jonathon Byrd - That is not the typical definition of "chewing cud". One can, of course, seek alternate definitions. Anyway, rock badgers (rock hyraxes, I assume) don't even do that. But if you think all the evidence is based on itself, you don't understand the evidence. Radioisotope ratios are unconnected with geological strata which are unconnected with the distance to stars and the speed of light which are unconnected with genetic diversity and allele distributions which are unconnected with the temperature of nebulae which are (etc. etc.), all of which point to a much older universe. | |
| Sep 15, 2011 at 23:50 | comment | added | capitalaudience.com | "massive, overwhelming evidence" is completely debatable. Considering all of the evidence is based on itself. | |
| Sep 15, 2011 at 23:48 | comment | added | capitalaudience.com | Actually rabbits do chew the cud. It passes out as stool and they re-eat it. Something that God knew that we're just learning. | |
| Sep 15, 2011 at 16:23 | history | answered | Rex Kerr | CC BY-SA 3.0 |