Timeline for Are there any churches that do not accept the teachings of Paul?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 13, 2015 at 5:28 | comment | added | david brainerd | The claim that Paul is the foundation of Christian sexual ethics is deceptive, considering that its Paul who argues (or so at least mainstream Protestant interpretation would have it) that the Law no longer has any relevance. And yet it is the Law that forms the basis of our sexual ethics, as also Acts 15 states. | |
| Jun 8, 2013 at 12:35 | history | edited | pterandon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
unclearly worded sentences
|
| Jun 7, 2013 at 16:00 | comment | added | pterandon | Gulshan, fair enough, but maybe that deserves a new question. | |
| Jun 7, 2013 at 15:59 | history | edited | pterandon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
mixed up former/ latter
|
| Jun 7, 2013 at 13:17 | comment | added | Gulshan | Found the link of James Tabor article informative in this matter. And eventually I found a recent published book "Paul and Jesus: How the Apostle Transformed Christianity" by him from the article- amazon.com/Paul-Jesus-Apostle-Transformed-Christianity/dp/… which should have been sheded a lot of light on the matter of incompatibility between teachings of Jesus and Paul. However, I was not talking about whole or partial rejection. Rather the cause of rejection is what I wanted to focus- incompatibility between the teachings of two. Other causes were not intended. | |
| Jun 7, 2013 at 12:19 | history | answered | pterandon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |