Timeline for Are there Bible translations that consistently include ALL meaning-altering Textus-Receptus variants in the footnotes?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 12 at 9:44 | history | edited | Wyrsa | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Did the work for the person... found a quick link and description of the edition.
|
| Nov 12 at 9:42 | comment | added | Wyrsa | A picture or quote about how this edition fulfills the request would make this answer a good one. | |
| Oct 5 at 20:41 | comment | added | Nigel J | I'm not going to down-vote or flag or anything but may I just point out that this should be a comment, not an answer. | |
| Oct 5 at 19:06 | review | Low quality posts | |||
| Nov 12 at 9:44 | |||||
| Oct 5 at 18:44 | comment | added | GratefulDisciple | Does the book points out consistently BOTH the critical and the textus-receptus Greek editions? To qualify as an answer, you have to show that the book does that. | |
| Oct 5 at 18:41 | history | answered | BCBSR | CC BY-SA 4.0 |