Timeline for What does "the scripture cannot be broken" mean?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17 at 8:04 | comment | added | Traildude | @Jess Interesting read. I note that Jungkuntz holds to the error that the Psalm 82 passage is about human judges, though I don't think that really changes his argument. | |
| Jul 15 at 23:12 | comment | added | Jess | I'm not sure I agree or disagree with it, but I'd recommend you check out Richard Jungkuntz's article on "An Approach to the Exegesis of John 10:34-36." ctsfw.net/media/pdfs/JungkuntzApproachExegesisJohn10.pdf | |
| Jul 12 at 13:28 | answer | added | Anne | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jul 8 at 7:30 | answer | added | Js Witness | timeline score: -1 | |
| Jul 8 at 6:55 | comment | added | Ryan Pierce Williams | Similar phrasing is used by Jesus in John 10:35 “ If he called them ‘gods,’ to whom the word of God came—and Scripture cannot be set aside”. Offhand I’d agree with your interpretation that it means that you can’t negate or ignore what is written in the scriptures | |
| Jul 8 at 5:22 | history | asked | Traildude | CC BY-SA 4.0 |