19 votes

How do Trinitarians respond to passages in the Bible that seem to clearly distinguish between God and Jesus after his ascension?

First, I will answer the question as posed in the title. The Ascension does not make a difference. Jesus ascended bodily into Heaven, and therefore His humanity also ascended. Second, as the Father ...
  • 665
11 votes

How did the four living creatures become associated with the Gospel writers?

This connection was made by fathers as early as Irenaeus (d. 202). Here's a table showing the views of several fathers whose writings we have on this subject: Lion Ox ...
8 votes
Accepted

What was the "Sect of Nicolaus" and did elements of it's influence carry down to our day?

Revelation 2:6 and 2:15 refer to an unidentified group of people called the Nicolaitanes, commending the church at Ephesus for hating the "deeds" of the Nicolaitanes, and blaming the church of ...
8 votes

Do/which Christians believe they hear from God?

I have, a small handful of times, perceived in my mind what presented as vocalized words from God. Whether this came in through my ears I cannot say. Prior to God saving me through Jesus Christ ...
  • 12.5k
7 votes

How does one explain God being outside the universe yet on the throne in heaven without violating divine simplicity?

There is no throne 'room' in scripture. There is the concept of a throne given to us for our understanding. Since God created all things, heavens (plural) and earth, he cannot be 'part' of that ...
  • 20.7k
6 votes

How do classic Trinitarians answer the implications of Revelation 1:1?

It's actually a pretty simple explanation within ontological Trinitarianism, understanding two basic facts about Trinitarianism: "God" undifferentiated in scripture typically refers to the Father, as ...
  • 4,876
6 votes

How do classic Trinitarians answer the implications of Revelation 1:1?

Trinitarians deal with this text in two ways: The source of the revelation is God the Father, and Jesus is the mediator of that revelation to man. Some particularly emphasize the human nature of ...
6 votes

Why does the KJV capitilise 'Devil' in Revelation but not in Luke?

This is more of an English question than a Christianity question, but the basic principles are: Capitalize Satan, Lucifer, Devil, Evil One, Father of Lies, etc., when used as a name or title of a ...
6 votes

Has Revelation 14:9 changed from bibles printed over 40 years ago?

BibleGateway.com has about fifty English translations of this verse, and they all include hand. This includes older translations like the KJV, RSV, and The Living Bible (1971). Of course, Bible ...
6 votes

Why Does Luther Translate "Alpha and Omega", in the Book of Revelation, as "A und O" (A and O)?

Yup, Luther is Spot On Technically, Luther's A und O (= English "A and O") is quite correct or as directly literal of a translation as one could get rendering the text into German (or English) ...
  • 378
6 votes

According to Jehovah's Witnesses, does Jesus make the same claim as God, that he is the "first and the last,"?

Although you specifically ask about the designation ‘First and Last’, there is a clear biblical link to that and the oft-concurrent designation ‘Alpha and Omega’, which is abundantly clear in the book ...
  • 21k
6 votes

How do Trinitarians respond to passages in the Bible that seem to clearly distinguish between God and Jesus after his ascension?

The answer is simple! As I've stated hundreds of times the Father has no separate manifestation from the Son. The Son is the only manifestation and REVELATION of the Father SO HE GAVE IT TO JESUS. ...
  • 4,208
5 votes

Do any other denominations agree with the Jehovah Witnesses that Satan was cast to earth in 1914?

Yes, if you consider dissident groups of JW tradition. In my research I have found at least 3 groups that share this belief to a greater or lesser degree. These are: As Testemunhas dos Deuses ...
5 votes

How do Mormons understand Revelation 22:3?

Revelation 3:21 To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne. This verse shows that the throne belongs to ...
  • 1,119
5 votes
Accepted

144,000: is there any denomination or group holding this symbolic interpretation?

The Christian theologian Emanuel Swedenborg (1688–1772) holds a compatible view. Here is his interpretation of the 144,000, from his book Apocalypse Revealed #348: And I heard the number of those ...
5 votes
Accepted

When was the number of the beast, 666, first identified as referring to Emperor Nero?

The first time Nero is directly interpreted as 666 or 616 was in 1831. The riddle seems to have been forgotten almost as soon as it was written and not solved until 1831 (when it first was ...
5 votes
Accepted

What is the Calvinist and Hyper-Calvinist understanding of the "whosoever will" from Rev. 22:17?

The term "hyper-Calvinist" is a moving target, due to its pejorative nature, but several historical theologians are widely considered to fall under that label. I'll examine the views of two ...
5 votes
Accepted

Saving the Earth is very in fashion these days,but is this a problem for the church, according to the RCC?

Pope Francis recently released an encyclical regarding the environment: LAUDATO SI’... ON CARE FOR OUR COMMON HOME. It begins: “Laudato si’, mi’ Signore” – “Praise be to you, my Lord”. In the ...
5 votes

What is an overview of what the kinds of things the beast in Revelation represents?

Introduction Wikipedia gives a pretty good summary of Revelation beasts. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Beast_(Revelation) It names the beast from the sea (ch 13), the scarlet beast (ch 17), the ...
5 votes
Accepted

From the Preterist (fulfilled eschatology) perspective, who was "the prince that shall come" of Dan. 9:26?

According to preterist interpreter Philip Mauro, the only answer is Titus. WHO IS "THE PRINCE THAT SHALL COME"? At this point we are confronted with a question which very seriously affects the ...
5 votes

Why does church tradition teach that one third of the angels fell with Lucifer when no verse supports that

@BYE points in the right direction. Some of the prophecies in Revelation look backwards to events that occurred before John lived, because the contest between Satan and God goes back to the beginning ...
5 votes
Accepted

How do JWs reconcile the belief that Satan was cast to earth in 1914 with Job 1:7 and Job 2:2?

Jehovah’s Witnesses believe that from the time of his rebellion until 1914 Satan was able to move about in the spiritual realm where Jehovah,Jesus and the faithful angelic host dwell, and in the ...
  • 6,881
5 votes
Accepted

The Protestant perspective concerning the Four Horsemen

There is no one, official Protestant interpretation. However, I can give information from a book compiled by a Protestant scholar but which makes no distinction between basically Catholic, and ...
  • 21k
5 votes
Accepted

The LDS perspective on the Four Horsmen

From the Doctrine and Covenants, section 77, which lays out revealed interpretations of some of the symbolism in the Book of Revelation: 6 Q. What are we to understand by the book which John saw, ...
  • 31k
5 votes

Why do Jehovah’s Witnesses cite William Barclay as to the identity of the speaker in Revelation 22:13 knowing he believed it is Jesus?

First, let me answer your question near the end of your comments, and then I will be able to give a swift, simple answer to your question in the heading. You asked near the end, “Why do the Jehovah ...
  • 21k
5 votes
Accepted

What is the basis for the belief that the Apostle John died around AD 100?

The early testimony of Irenaeus Irenaeus of Lyons explicitly tells us that John was still living at the time of Emperor Trajan's accession (AD 98): [T]he Church in Ephesus, founded by Paul, and ...

Only top scored, non community-wiki answers of a minimum length are eligible