In Amos 8, the prophet declares (NIV trans.):
11 “The days are coming,” declares the Sovereign Lord, “when I will
send a famine through the land— not a famine of food or a thirst for
water, but a famine of hearing the words of the Lord.
12 People will stagger from sea to sea and wander from north to east,
searching for the word of the Lord, but ...
Murder and killing are not necessarily the same thing. The King James Bible adds confusion to this debate by translating Exodus 20:13 as:
Thou shalt not kill.
Which historically has been interpreted to mean a commandment against all forms of killing, including capital punishment, war, and in some cases, even against killing animals. In the context of ...
Yes, you're absolutely right! Jesus never broke any bones. That's a fulfillment of the prophecy from Old Testament and it's written about in John.
John 19:36 (NIV)
These things happened so that the scripture would be fulfilled: “Not one of his bones will be broken,"
The prophecy that John refers to is found in Psalms 34:20:
Psalms 34:19-20 (NIV)
The very next story in each of those passages is the transfiguration. My interpretation: The kingdom is here! Jesus is alive and reigning through his church and in the hearts of the saints. Because the Kingdom has an already/not-yet character, it has not yet come in its fullness, but it is here. And Peter/James/John saw in the transfiguration a preview of ...
Prophecy about Jesus' return within 56 years
Per the History of the Church, vol. 2, p. 189, he said
...and go forth to prune the vineyard for the last time, or the coming of the Lord, which was nigh--even fifty-six years should wind up the scene.
That was in 1891.
Prophecy that the temple would be built in Missouri within Smith's Generation
The existing answer provides a learned and fascinating discussion for tracing the interpretative history of Isaiah 52:13-53:12 (often conveniently abbreviated to "Isaiah 53", the so-called "Fourth Servant Song") from roughly the 1st C. CE. Thus, the conclusion...
We can ... be confident that first century converts to Christianity did not invent the idea ...
When Jesus said that the scribes and Pharisees would be charged for the murder of all the prophets, that is, from Abel to Zechariah, he indicated what he considered to be the Hebrew canon. He was speaking according to the traditional Jewish canon, in which Chronicles is listed as the last book and in which Zechariah is killed at 2 Chronicles 24:20, 21.
Without doing too much digging and research I can think of one example.
In Matthew 2 the priests and teachers of the law knew that the Christ was to be born in Bethelehem as per their interpretation of the prophecy in Micah 5.
Matthew 2:3-6 (ESV)
3 When Herod the king heard this, he was troubled, and all Jerusalem
with him; 4 and assembling all the ...
You are confusing titles with proper names.
Yesh'ua (Heb.) is rendered "Jesus" or "Joshua" today. It is his given name. It means "Jehovah Saves."
Christos (Greek) is a title translating the Hebrew "Messiah" or "Annointed One." It highlights his annointed and special status.
Immanuel (Heb.) is a simple Hebrew construction that says "God is with us." It is ...
First, it should be noted that even if Jews did not view the passage as Messianic before Jesus, that does not prove that it is a invalid interpretation. In Old Testament times, Biblical prophecies were often not recognized until they were fulfilled. That said, let's look at the evidence.
Targum Jonathan ben Uziel
The Targums are interpretative ...
The Dead Sea Scrolls are not themselves a unique set of content, but rather a collection --rather like someone's private library-- of various texts from the time period that were all preserved together and help us understand the state of those texts at a specific point in time.
One example would be the Isaiah scroll, a basically complete copy of the ...
The Epistle of Barnabas is not considered canon. Sticking purely to canon, the bible is very explicit that we do not know. The world could end tomorrow. Or this afternoon. Or 10,000 years from now:
Watch therefore, for you know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of man comes.
No one knows about that day or hour, ...
The Mystery of the Temple's 'Molten Metals'
Two recent apologists told the story, apparently independently, of molten gold seeping between the temple`s foundation stones during the Siege of Jerusalem in 70 CE. Both implied the source was Josephus, but neither provided references. Unfortunately, both had theological motivations for adding these details to ...
I think a possible explanation would be that some of the disciples did see the heavenly Kingdom of God through visions they received during their lifetimes. John's account in Revelation is probably the best example, as he vividly describes a kingdom - including Jesus' ascension to the throne.
The "some" here would suggest that more than one disciple would ...
Old Testament prophecies are sometimes 'thematic', by 'type' or 'metaphor' as in the case of these three days. There are various places in the Old Testament that give special meaning to three days. The gospels however only refer to the prophecy of Jonah. Christ said that Jonah would be the 'sign' that God would give the Jews, as a rebuke for their obstinacy....
1. Schools of the Prophets in the Old Testament
Many well known commentaries explain the "sons of the prophets" referred to on multiple occasions in the Old Testament [1 Kings 20:35; 2 Kings 2:3,5,7,15; 4:1,38; 5:22; 6:1; 9:1] as:
...the schools of the prophets... - Benson, Pulpit, Matthew Henry
...a school of the prophets... - Gill
It does seem that the Jews hadn't understood that the Messiah would have to suffer, or that the suffering servant of Isaiah 53 was the Messiah. Apart from the verse you have quoted, there are other verses which suggest that the Jews didn't understand this.
They understood that the Christ would be the "King of Israel" (Matthew 15:32), they knew that he ...
I believe they have for 1914 & 1925, but I may be missing some years.
Adding some info from the below source per request;
1899 "...the 'battle of the great day of God Almighty' (Revelation
16:14), which will end in A.D. 1914 with the complete overthrow of
earth's present rulership, is already commenced," (The Time Is at
Hand, 1908 edition, p. ...
My response comes from this article about OT prophecy about Jesus from Nazareth.
It basically states that there is no direct Old-Testament reference to Nazareth. The article postulates two explanations:
1) It was a reference that Jesus would be despised.
He says 'prophets,' plural. It could be that Matthew was referring to several Old Testament ...
Then they made signs to his father, to find out what he would like
to name the child. He asked for a writing tablet, and to everyone's
astonishment he wrote, "His name is John."
He had all the time prior to this to write it out to her. That is most likely how he would have communicated it to her. Zechariah writing here is just to show everyone else.
The passage is most likely referring to the nation of Babylon.
Per ESV Study Bible Note:
Jer. 6:22–23 great nation. Babylon. the farthest parts of the earth. Babylon’s army had outposts all over the ancient world. This army has no mercy; its horses are so numerous that their thundering hoofs sound like the roaring sea (4:13, 29).
Abram to Abraham
God had promised Abram that he would have a son and that it would be through his wife Sarai. Abram's name means "Exalted Father", which may have proven to be an embarrassment as he aged without children. This fits with God's promise, but he didn't receive that name from God but from his father.
God gives him the name "Abraham", which ...
Jesus' contemporary followers not only believed in "a god", they had a common understanding of the existence and nature of God, because his mission was to the people of Israel (cf. Jesus answer to the Canaanite woman in Matthew 15:14: "I was sent only to the lost sheep of the House of Israel"). This is not to assert that all of Jesus' followers came from the ...
Gospel means "good news." Understood rightly, this bit of news to Adam and Eve was certainly good news. The snake - the epitome of sin - had tricked Adam and Eve. Because of the snake (and their own sinful actions, of course) they were being kicked out of the garden. By trying to become like God, they had become like the snake - sinful and evil.
But God ...
It's a combination of a couple of things.
First, there's a passage in Matthew 24:38-41:
For in the days before the flood, people were eating and drinking,
marrying and giving in marriage, up to the day Noah entered the ark;
and they knew nothing about what would happen until the flood came and
took them all away. That is how it will be at the ...
I am a professional archeologist. Many end times aficionados believe that Magog represents Russia and that Russia will soon come to invade Israel. However, the ancient Assyrians had dealings with Magog, which was also called Lydia, and their Court records clearly identify Magog and it is not Russia. For decades Christians have been deceived and have been ...
God told Noah to build an ark to save his family because God was going to destroy the earth with a flood. Noah built the ark, so he seems to have understood it.
13 And God said to Noah, “I have determined to make an end of all
flesh, for the earth is filled with violence through them. Behold, I
will destroy them with the earth. 14 Make ...
Burton L. Mack, Professor of early Christianity at the School of Theology at Claremont, says one can ask any question of the Bible and get some kind of answer. If the first answer does not appear to be helpful, one can look for another answer to the same question, until the right answer appears. In Who Wrote the New Testament, page 299, he says this is a ...