If it is a scientific certainty that a tree create one and only one ring per year, then this would be problematic. However, as you can read on Wikipedia, this is not always the case:
Alternating poor and favorable conditions, such as mid summer
droughts, can result in several rings forming in a given year. Wikipedia
So, it would only take conditions ...
Yes, biologists have identified about 1.4 million species. There are surely other species not yet identified and cataloged, but estimates vary widely on how many. I've seen estimates for total number of species ranging from less than 2 million to over 100 million.
But the majority of species are microscopic. By definition, microscopic creatures would not ...
According to http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2001/SyedQadri.shtml, the total volume of the world's oceans is 1.3 to 1.5 billion cubic kilometers, which comes out to 310 to 360 million cubic miles. The surface area of the Earth is about 200 million square miles. So if the Earth was a perfect sphere, with no mountains, no valleys, no ocean trenches, the water ...
I realize that what I'm about to put forward is not conclusively proven, but it is possible. It's specifically answering from the perspective of young-earth creationists, which isn't the only view out there. (But it is the one you specified you wanted in your question.)
Noah didn't have to save the fish.
Your question makes two assumptions that seem ...
The flood is explicitly used typologically twice in the New Testament.
Jesus, speaking of the final judgment (Matthew 24:37-41), says it will be like "the days of Noah".
For as the days of Noah were, so will be the coming of the Son of Man. For as in those days before the flood they were eating and drinking, marrying and giving in marriage, until the day ...
The flood happened precisely on account of the issues you raise. More specifically, it debunks the premises on which those issues are founded.
As Christians living thousands of years later with only a short Scriptural account to go on, we can really only speculate about how the people of Noah's day must have reasoned with themselves. However it seems likely ...
Creationists who believe the flood was a real global event say the water is still here, in the earth's oceans.
The oceans are much deeper than the mountains of earth are high, and they cover a much greater proportion of the earth's surface. Some have estimated that if the earth's surface was flattened the oceans' waters would cover the land to a depth of 2....
Noah was command to take every animal that walks on the face of the earth - not those that "swim in the deep."
From Genesis 6:19 - 20, via the Amplified Bible.
And of every living thing of all flesh [found on land], you shall bring two of every sort into the ark, to keep them alive with you; they shall be male and female.
Of fowls and birds according ...
It's rather ironic — the thrust of your question is "Why did God wait so long?" Andrew Lloyd Webber asks the exact opposite question — "Why come so early?" As Judas sings in the finale:
Every time I look at you
I don't understand
Why you let the things you did
Get so out of hand
You'd have managed better
If you'd had it planned
Now why'd you ...
In support of the idea that it did not rain is the very next verse:
But a mist went up from the earth and watered the whole face of the
No further mention is made of rain until the Flood account. Anything beyond this is conjecture on our part.
The Catholic Church does not have an "official" position on the literal interpretation of the Old Testament (including the great flood narration). Whether they are literal or not has no bearing on whether the lesson they impart is true. Catholics are free to understand them as literal or not. The Church only insists that the Bible is inspired and inerrant ...
It is always better to admit you don't know than to make something up, especially when it comes to speaking about God!
The idea that God fills in the gaps of our knowledge with his miracle super powers is called the 'God of the Gaps.' It has the problem of making God look like he decreases while our knowledge increases. It also does not adequately account ...
Answers in Genesis and Creation Ministries International, two young-earth creationist organizations, have similar answers to this question. They don't attribute a direct supernatural cause, but instead attribute the age drop-off primarily to genetics.
Both cite several factors:
Environmental changes following the flood: probably nothing more than a minor ...
Scientifically speaking, evolution is not required for variations within a species. The only requirement is that all of the genetic information seen in the species today was present in the first generation. From then on, species experience the isolation of genes through geographic and other factors.
The breeding of new species of dogs does not produce new ...
Basically there are three ways that genetic diversity happens:
Sexual combination: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution#Sex_and_recombination
Gene Flow: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution#Gene_flow
All of these processes do in fact have the potential of generating new genetic information. ...
The question seems to assume the Genesis account is literal, so I'll answer from the YEC view, which assumes it's literal.
The usual disclaimer - not all denominations assume the Genesis account is actual history, I'm just answering as if it is, since the question seems to be looking for that viewpoint.
From Genesis 9 (KJV)
And God spake unto Noah, ...
Usual preface that seems necessary to head off debate on such questions and answers - this isn't endorsing or denying the YEC view, just answering how various YEC groups would answer the question. Whether the YEC'ers are right or wrong is completely off-topic, as has the long-standing policy been.
While we can't answer this definitively, several ...
The same way it was lost in the first place.
For the same reason that Cain killed Abel.
Noah was saved physically from the physical calamity, but he was not regenerated. He was not yet saved from sin. He was still a sinful creature as were the other members of his family. The promise from Genesis 3:15 was not yet fulfilled.
The Bible and indeed all of ...
Like Young Earth Creationists do with most things, they believe that the conventional dating systems are wrong.
In the case of Egypt this involves saying that what are normally thought to be sequential dynasties are actually concurrent dynasties. The most extreme accounts propose that the First and Second Intermediate Periods are actually one period, a time ...
The first step in looking for a respected theologian who can propose this view is to define how we know a theologian is respected, and I suggest a minimum requirement is that he or she is a theologian who has written works that are cited by his or her peers; a theologian is also likely to teach theology in a tertiary environment, but perhaps this is not so ...
There are 4 basic views regarding the interpretation of the great flood. Generally speaking, these connect to the interpretation of Genesis 1-3 as well.
The first camp is from those who take literal reading of Genesis. Despite some scientific drawbacks here, such as the fact that there does not exist enough water in any form (including ice) to ...
Why does a judge sentence one man to prison, another to community service, and gives a third a suspended sentence? It may be because the judge is capricious, but it might also be because, after examining the facts of each case, he fairly concludes that this is the appropriate action in each.
Considering how little we know about the pre-Flood world, I think ...
Your answer seems correct. As God has never approved of being unequally yoked. Cain's descendants followed after Cain and dwelt in his city (Gen 4:17). God never wanted people to live clustered in cities, where sin would abound, and there are various examples of this throughout Genesis. God's people stayed in the wilderness, tilling the ground and doing the ...
Local-flood proponents generally fall into one of two camps:
That the narrative is told from the point of view of the author, and from the author's point of view, the flood covered the entire (known) earth. (One example).
In this view, I believe the only logical explanation for your question would be that God's promise was taken to mean that this would not ...
Noah lived 350 years after the Flood (Gen 9:28).
Arphaxad was born 2 years after the Flood (Gen 11:10)
Salah was born 2 + 35 after Flood (verse 12)
Eber was born 2 + 35 + 30 after Flood (v14)
Peleg 2 + 35 + 30 + 34 (v16)
Reu 2 + 35 + 30 + 34 + 30 (v18)
Serug etc, etc (v20)
Abraham was born 2 + 35 + 30 + 34 + 30 + 32 + 30 + 29 +...
In addition to Affable's answer, there is also Genesis 9:3 which indicates that at least mankind did not eat meat before the flood:
Every moving thing that lives shall be food for you. And as I gave you the green plants, I give you everything.
It is arguable that animals did not prior to the release from the Ark, as well - they also were not afraid of ...
1. He already has warned us
2. We refuse to listen
At the conclusion of the story of Lazarus and the Rich Man (Luke 16), Lazarus pleads with Abraham to go warn his brothers about the fires of hell. The story continues:
"'No, father Abraham,' he said, 'but if someone from the dead goes to them, they will repent.'
"He said to him, 'If they do ...
Assuming your date for creation and delta to the flood are correct, one way is to say the tree was not uprooted or killed by the flood. Perhaps it went dormant, as in winter. (If that fails, there's always supernatural preservation.)
After all, the dove brought back the olive branch as the sign that things were growing again shortly after the flood. So ...