This post is outlined as follows:
- Latter-day Saint perspective (the original extent of this post)
- Extreme cases
- A Biblical example
- A response to competing arguments
1. Latter-day Saint perspective
Yes!
There are multiple examples in the scriptures of people doing this -- the most well-known example from the Book of Mormon is in Alma 22:17-18
17 And it came to pass that when Aaron had said these words, the king
did bow down before the Lord, upon his knees; yea, even he did
prostrate himself upon the earth, and cried mightily, saying:
18 O God, Aaron hath told me that there is a God; and if there is a
God, and if thou art God, wilt thou make thyself known unto me, and I
will give away all my sins to know thee, and that I may be raised from
the dead, and be saved at the last day.
A more full account, what led up to this, and the results thereof, can be found in Alma chapter 22.
There are several very important variables to highlight from this experience:
- The king's prayer was preceded by instruction, which gave the king a correct understanding regarding the basics of the plan of salvation and the Gospel of Jesus Christ (see verses 13-14). If the king had received a "yes" in answer to his prayer, it wouldn't have helped him without first grasping what "yes" meant.
- The king had been greatly humbled (see Alma chapter 20) and recognized that he was grievously trapped in sin with no ability to rescue himself through his own power (see Alma 22:13-15). This was quite an admission to make for a man who wielded tremendous earthly power (see verse 1)
- The king sincerely wanted to fundamentally change his life (see verse 15)
- The king had real intent. In a prior chapter he had been willing to give up half his kingdom to save his mortal life (see Alma 20:21-23). Now, he is willing to give up his entire kingdom, and all his sins, anything God asks of him, in order to have the truth (see Alma 22:15,16,18). He is all-in and 100% committed to act upon the answer he receives (as also evidenced by his actions in later chapters, after his conversion)
2. Extreme Cases
Can this work in extreme cases? Yes!
The king in question was an extreme case: he was the leader of what in today's terms we would probably call a terrorist state. He was also politically & socially prominent (so very real image impact to change his life). He even referred to what he and his people had done previously as "murders" (Alma 24:10). Even he could change.
28 Behold, hath the Lord commanded any that they should not partake of his goodness? Behold I say unto you, Nay; but all men are privileged the one like unto the other, and none are forbidden. (2 Nephi 26:28)
3. A Biblical example
I believe the example I cited above is the clearest scriptural parallel (in the canon I recognize) to the examples in the OP. Several have expressed interest in an example specifically from the Old or New Testament -- I will offer such an example in the person of Saul of Tarsus.
Saul was not skeptical of God in general, but he was highly skeptical of the Christian understanding of Deity.
So skeptical, in fact, that he didn't just remain ambivalent or agnostic on the question, like his teacher Gamaliel advised (see Acts 5:34-39), but he actively fought against Christians. He pursued imprisonment and harm against them, and at the very least was what we would today call "a person of interest" in the murder of Stephen.
At the end of the day, I see relatively little practical difference between one who resists obedience to God because they:
- worship a god of their own making, which god is not believed to have supernatural powers (e.g. scientism) vs.
- worship a god of their own making, which god is believed to have supernatural powers (e.g. the idols Paul rejects in Acts 17:19)
Paul's criticism of the Greeks on Mars hill is that they are worshipping things made by the hands of men (what powers those idols were thought to have is actually pretty irrelevant). An atheist can just as easily do this today.
Thus, I see Saul, when confronted with the God taught by Christianity, as being every bit a skeptic--if not more so--than those quoted in the OP. So how does Saul respond when something happens in his life to prompt him to doubt his doubts?
And I answered, Who art thou, Lord? (Acts 22:8a)
And I said, What shall I do, Lord? (Acts 22:10a)
I see a clear parallel between these questions and those listed in the OP. Saul didn't ask these questions because he had already believed in Jesus. He asks the first question because he genuinely doesn't know (aka I hereby declare myself a seeker, a seeker of truth, what-ever it is) He asks the second question because the first question was sincere and he wants to know how to proceed (aka I want to know the truth and live the truth. If you are the truth, please help me).
Saul utters a skeptic's prayer -- at the time the first words leave his mouth he does not believe in Jesus. BUT! Saul offers a sincere skeptic's prayer. His later actions demonstrate he had real intent to follow through on whatever answer he was given, even if it required a dramatic rearrangement of his priorities (spoiler alert: it did).
4. A response to competing arguments
User bob has provided a competing view - I appreciate bob's argument and would like to respond to 4 points made therein.
Sign seeking
Is the skeptic's prayer a quest for truth or a case of sign-seeking? The words of the skeptic's prayer could be exactly the same in either case, but the intent matters.
The quintessential example of faithless sign-seeking is found in Matthew 27:
41 Likewise also the chief priests mocking him, with the scribes and
elders, said,
42 He saved others; himself he cannot save. If he be the King of
Israel, let him now come down from the cross, and we will believe him.
This was not a sincere desire to know the truth.
I am not qualified to adjudicate in general which person's prayer is sincere and which is not, but with the benefit of hindsight it is clear that Saul's prayer in Acts 22 was sincere--he didn't want a sign to satisfy a challenge, he wanted truth.
"Ask and it shall be given you" and "If any of you lack wisdom, let him ask of God" are not invitations to flatter one's intellectual vanity - they are directions to those who sincerely seek to find truth.
--
Has God already given us all the evidence through the creation?
I do believe the creation provides grounds to believe in God. However, it does not tell us everything we need to know about God. If the creation triggers within a person a genuine desire to know if God exists and what that means, and said person acts upon that prompting to seek greater light & knowledge, I would consider that a success.
The same man who wrote the teleological argument in Romans 1 also asked on the road to Damascus "What shall I do, Lord?"
He knew that God existed, but he needed further information to know what to do about it. He asked for that information, and he received.
--
I see no reason to pray such a prayer when God has established a biblical way to learn about himself.
The people in the Bible didn't have a Bible, so there must be an additional way to learn about God.
True, Saul had the Hebrew Bible, but he knew it back to front before the road to Damascus and he still managed to misunderstand it until he asked God some specific questions (noted above). Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, and many others didn't even have the Hebrew Bible, but they too were able to learn about God.
Perhaps the most effective course is to learn about God the way the people in the Bible learned about God. My read of the Bible leads me to the conclusion that this includes both studying existing holy records and sincere prayer (and much more).
--
he desires us to put our faith in him (that he exists), but more than that in his Son Jesus and be saved.
I couldn't agree more!
There is a common misconception, particularly among atheists (though it's found elsewhere too), that God's leading priority is convincing us that He exists. No, it isn't! If that were priority #1 of course He could give a show of power that nobody could deny.
He wants us to exercise faith in Jesus Christ and to experience the transformation derivative from it. If an overwhelming show of power would provide conviction without conversion, belief without faith, change without commitment, or obedience without transformation, then for God's purposes this would be counterproductive. He will not convince us that He exists if in so doing He would actually make it harder for us to progress.
Providing us with knowledge that we are not ready for would only serve to condemn us further (see Luke 12:47-48), so to those who would not use revealed knowledge productively He withholds knowledge as an act of mercy.
But surely if a person knows that a loving, Omnipotent God exists then failing to follow His plan is irrational? (Yes, but for a person who knows about lung cancer smoking is irrational too....often there is tension between what we want right now and what we want long-term)
A good teacher knows that students will struggle to appreciate an answer if they did not appreciate the question -- so God encourages us to ponder & ask questions, not to seek a sign, but to receive the answers we're prepared for.
If forcing belief erects barriers to conversion, a loving God isn't going to force belief.
Conclusion
Is there scriptural support for such a prayer? Yes.
But just saying it isn't nearly enough.