4

We have on Wikipedia, a tabular statement of the numbering systems adopted in regard to the Ten Commandments, by different traditions. One can see a telling difference in the numbering pattern. For instance, the Commandment against adultery appears at No.6 in the Augustinian division followed by Roman Catholics, Lutherans, etc. whereas it appears at No.7 in the Septuagint version followed by Eastern Orthodox and Reformed Christians. With more communication and dialogue taking place not only between various denominations , but between Christianity and other religions in the modern era, it is expedient to draw up a unified numbering of the Commandments.

Has anyone ever attempted a unified numbering of Ten Commandments, applicable to all traditions and denominations?

10
  • 3
    This is a major point of contention among many Protestants against Catholicism. Specifically, Protestants claim that the Catechism and other Catholic Church teachings intentionally obscure the "graven image" commandment inside Commandment 1, and then split the covetousness commandment into 9 and 10. The Protestants will never give on this issue, and the Catholics almost never compromise on traditions that are so old. So, knowing that, who would really try? They've been having a dogmatic argument about it for centuries.
    – user3961
    Commented Sep 24, 2023 at 17:27
  • 2
    Does it matter? Surely it is more important to avoid committing adultery than to haggle about whether it is really the 6th or the 7th commandment?
    – user59106
    Commented Sep 24, 2023 at 19:12
  • 1
    @fredsbend If a Catholic and a protestant commit adultery, they won't be able to agree which commandment they are breaking;-)
    – user59106
    Commented Sep 24, 2023 at 23:32
  • 1
    A simple solution would be to quote the verse with the command one has broken, with no reference to numbers or even verse numbers! The Bible had no verses or chapters to begin with! Trouble is, how many people today can accurately quote a verse or two?
    – Anne
    Commented Sep 25, 2023 at 9:52
  • 2
    @KadalikattJosephSibichan I do understand how hard it is to talk about such things, but "sinned against commandment X" means nothing. A priest should normally first ask "What do you mean by that?". Thinking sexually about other person, masturbation, pornography, adultery out or in marriage all fall into one commandment, but they are all different sins. And even if such a misunderstanding occur, that's something you normally solve in normal conversation within confession: "Oh, sorry, I'm used to Protestant numbering. I meant 6th commandment/the adultery". Commented Sep 25, 2023 at 9:56

4 Answers 4

7

Has anyone attempted a unified numbering of Ten Commandments?

This has, I believe, never been really seriously attempted because of the various ways in which Christians interpret the Sacred Scriptures.

Different religious traditions will categorize the seventeen verses of Exodus 20:1–17 and their parallels in Deuteronomy 5:4–21 into ten commandments in different ways. Some scholars suggest that the number ten is simply a choice to aid memorization rather than a matter of theology.

The diverse Christian traditions are too far apart to have an unified common numbering of the Ten Commandments.

The Division of the Ten Commandments

One dispute concerning the Ten Commandments concerns how they are to be divided. We are told in Scripture that there are ten of them (Exodus 34:28, Deuteronomy 4:13, 10:4), but we are not told exactly how the text should be divided.

This is a problem because there are actually more than ten imperative statements in the two relevant texts (Exodus 20:1-17, Deuteronomy 5:6-21). Here is a count of them based on Exodus 20:

1 You shall have no other gods before me.

2 You shall not make for yourself a graven image...

3 You shall not bow down to them or serve them...

4 You shall not take the name of the LORD your God in vain...

5 Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy.

6 Six days you shall labor...

7 In it [the seventh day] you shall not do any work...

8 Honor your father and your mother...

9 You shall not kill.

10 You shall not commit adultery.

11 You shall not steal.

12 You shall not bear false witness against your

13 You shall not covet your neighbor's house

14 You shall not covet your neighbor's wife...

Obviously, in order to get these to total ten commandments, some imperative statements must be grouped together. Fortunately, most of the groupings are obvious, but there are still two groupings which are disputed. There is also one other issue complicating matters. The passages which refer to the Ten Commandments, do indeed specify that there are “ten” of them, but they don't actually say that they are “commandments”. - The Division of the Ten Commandments

2
  • 1
    There's also the question of where the missing five should number.
    – user3961
    Commented Sep 24, 2023 at 17:43
  • Obviously 5–7 go together, and 2–3, leaving one more to go. 13–14 is the next reasonable choice. The Catholic Church though, retains these two specific examples of coveting (meaning it's okay to covet your neighbor's car?) and merges 1–3 (meaning that abbreviated lists will not mention graven images). Deuteronomy 5:21 makes this choice inappropriate: "Neither shalt thou desire thy neighbour's wife, neither shalt thou covet thy neighbour's house, his field, or his manservant, or his maidservant, his ox, or his ass, or any thing that is thy neighbour's.". The Church is not going to change. Commented Sep 4 at 17:37
4

There have indeed been attempts unify or recover the "original form" of the Ten Commandments but no such effort has gained much traction in the Ecumenical Movement. Here is one such attempt by G. Wildeboer, cited by the editors of the Jewish Encyclopedia.

  1. "I am Yhwh, thy God," etc.
  2. Thou shalt have no other gods before Me [beside Me].
  3. Thou shalt not take the name of Yhwh thy God in vain.
  4. Remember the Sabbath-day.
  5. Honor thy father and thy mother.
  6. Thou shalt not murder.
  7. Thou shalt not commit adultery.
  8. Thou shalt not steal.
  9. Thou shalt not bear false witness.
  10. Thou shalt not covet.

Several other approaches are discussed in the article linked above.

2

It would be hard to proof nobody ever tried. But I haven’t heard of such an attempt in my lifetime.

I do think such an attempt would be rather futile by the way. You can decide that one numbering or the other is the right one. And the “other” group would have to accept that. Why would they?

4
  • 2
    Indeed. xkcd.com/927 Commented Sep 24, 2023 at 18:25
  • 2
    Traditionally the way for one part of the Christian faith to get another part to accept their opinion is to brutally murder them, thus winning by default
    – Valorum
    Commented Sep 24, 2023 at 18:27
  • @Valorum Traditionally, it is the murdered that get their way eventually.
    – user3961
    Commented Sep 24, 2023 at 23:12
  • 2
    It's quite hard to claim a 'moral victory' if you're dead, your followers are dead, your ideas are suppressed and nobody's heard of you.
    – Valorum
    Commented Sep 24, 2023 at 23:17
0

I made such an attempt. I document it in the chapter "Which Ten Commandments?" in Plague, Precept, Prophet, Peace. I elaborate on it in "Appendix I: A Clock for Timothy".

The problem is to find a use of the commandments as an organizational schema in some other part of the Bible. If one can show how that section of the Bible has a "ten-ness" to it with each part corresponding to a different commandment and the correspondence is detailed enough to rule out one way of dividing the commandments and rule in another, then you have your answer.

I found several such passages. Some of the Ten Plagues on Egypt have a close correspondence to the matching Commandments. The argument is complex because it draws some of the correspondences from later events in the Old Testament.

The cleanest and most compact passage is in 1 Timothy. In my appendix, I show how the ten chapters of 1 & 2 Timothy each correspond to a commandment; that is Paul's organizational principle that unifies the two letters. However, Paul does not give the commandments in canonical order. Nevertheless, even with his reordering of commandments, it is clear that he divided the commands the way Protestants and Orthodox do.

Now we know that the law is good, if one uses it lawfully, understanding this, that the law is not laid down for the just

  • II but for the lawless and disobedient,
  • I for the ungodly and sinners,
  • IV for the unholy
  • III and profane,
  • V for those who strike their fathers and mothers,
  • VI for murderers,
  • VII the sexually immoral, men who practice homosexuality,
  • VIII enslavers,
  • IX liars, perjurers,
  • X and whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine…

1 Timothy 1:8-10 ESV

To clarify a few assignments:

  • "the ungodly and sinners" do not worship the one God of the first commandment
  • "the lawless and disobedient" are those who practice idolatry
  • "the unholy" break the sabbath commandment, because we are to keep the sabbath holy.
  • "the profane" break the commandment by profane speech when they take the Lord's name in vain
  • "the sexually immoral, men who practice homosexuality" commit adultery
  • "enslavers" steal people's freedom, hence commit theft
  • "liars, perjurers" break the command to not bear false witness

This leaves the catchall "whatever else is contrary to sound doctrine" to address covetousness which thus is a single commandment, not two. The correlations are reinforced when you look at the actual content of the chapters in Paul's letters. For example, "For there is one God, and there is one mediator between God and men, the man Christ Jesus," (1 Timothy 2:5) speaks of there being only one God, the first commandment.

So using the Apostle Paul's division of the commandments, you arrive at the Protestant list.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .