The doctrine of the queenship of Mary, is the belief that once Mary had passed away and ascended to heaven, that she was crowned as the queen of heaven and given a special and exalted role as the queen of heaven.

People who belief in this doctrine (i.e Orthodox and Catholic Christians) normally quote from Revelation 12:1-5 in order to prove this, but did any of the Early Church Fathers believe that Revelation 12:1-5 was speaking about Mary?

  • 3
    I would hope that they saw this woman as a picture of Israel (Genesis 37:9-10): The woman is crowned and then in childbirth. Aug 31, 2023 at 11:35
  • 1
    Generally in symbolic prophecy, women represent religions or churches. In this case the woman is God's church as represented by the 12 tribes of Israel up until it produced the Messiah, and by spiritual Israel (true Christianity) thereafter. Aug 31, 2023 at 12:44

1 Answer 1


Did any of the Early Church Fathers believe that Revelation 12:1-5 is about the Virgin Mary?

I would like to point out one thing before going on this this post. No one in the Early Church would have used Scriptures the way we do today in reference to a particular part of Sacred Scriptures. The Bible was not referenced to with chapter and verse until the Middle Ages when the Archbishop of Canterbury Cardinal Stephan Langton set the Scriptures with chapter and verse. Ergo one is not going to find a lot text using Scripture and verse in the Early Church, especially in the verses in question.

The identification of Mary as the “woman clothed with the sun” in Revelation 12 finds support in the Fathers of the Church. The first extant patristic source on the Marian identification of the woman of Revelation 12 is St. Epiphanius of Salamis (d. 403). He wrote:

“But elsewhere, in the Apocalypse of John, we read that the dragon hurled himself at the woman who had given birth to a male child; but the wings of an eagle were given to the woman, and she flew into the desert, where the dragon could not reach her” (Rev. 12:13-14). This could have happened in Mary‟s case.”

Steve Puluka, a liturgy, church history and patristics teacher at Manor College comments that:

“This passage merely mentions the association exists without really endorsing theview wholeheartedly himself. He qualifies the identification with [Mary] dare not affirmthis with absolute certainty. But this silence of the early evidence is as much a reflectionof the dearth of material interpreting Revelation at all from the time period. Thereferences to any aspect of the book are few and far between in the extant literature. Butthe tepid mention by Epiphanius demonstrates that the existence of a Marianidentification of the woman in the same time period was widespread enough that he couldnot pass the text without comment on it .” (underscoring supplied)

Mariologist Michael O’Carroll notes that “[t]here is in the same age a vague reference in Andrew of Caesarea to people who identified the woman with Mary.”

Both Epiphanius of Salamis and Andrew of Caesarea both record that some „some people‟ identified the woman clothed with the sun as Mary the mother of Jesus; but they do not say who those people were. Hence, it can be said that the opinion was known inthe fourth century.

In 430 A.D., Quodvultdeus, a disciple and friend of St. Augustine of Hippo ,made the first overtly Marian identification of the woman of Revelation 12:

“None of you is ignorant of the fact that the dragon was the devil. The woman signified the Virgin Mary.”

  • Thank you so much. Aug 31, 2023 at 13:58

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .