This morning I read an article claiming that during the millennial kingdom the temple described in Ezekiel chapter 40 points to a new temple that will exist during the millennial kingdom on Earth. I understand this view is held by some premillennialists who adopt a literal interpretation of the thousand year reign of Christ. They say Jesus will literally come to earth to rule from the city of Jerusalem. Here is an extract from the article in question:

Most premillennial scholars agree that the purpose of animal sacrifice during the millennial kingdom is memorial in nature. As the Lord’s Supper is a reminder of the death of Christ to the Church today, animal sacrifices will be a reminder during the millennial kingdom. To those born during the millennial kingdom, animal sacrifices will again be an object lesson. During that future time, righteousness and holiness will prevail, but those with earthly bodies will still have a sin nature, and there will be a need to teach about how offensive sin is to a holy and righteous God. Animal sacrifices will serve that purpose, "but in those sacrifices there is a reminder of sins year by year" (Hebrews 10:3). https://www.gotquestions.org/millennial-sacrifices.html

The article concedes that a primary objection to this point of view is that Christ offered a perfect sacrifice for sin, and there is therefore no need to sacrifice animals for sin. However, it then goes on to assert that since animal sacrifices did not take away sins in the Old Testament the need for animal sacrifices during the (literal) thousand year reign of Christ (ruling from Jerusalem) will serve as an object lessons for human sinners who will be alive after the second coming of Christ Jesus.

Is this the view of “most premillennial scholars”? Is Ezekiel chapter 40 a description of a physical new temple to be built in Jerusalem where animal sacrifices will once again happen under a Jewish priesthood from the lineage of Zadok the Priest?

  • I don't know about "most", but here's one view: Bible Commentary: Ezekiel 40 | United Church of God. Mar 16, 2023 at 19:47
  • @RayButterworth - I will read this article later today when I have time. Many thanks.
    – Lesley
    Mar 17, 2023 at 8:12
  • Up-voted +1. I view the epistle to the Hebrews as a comprehensive rebuttal of this theory but it will be interesting to see what scriptures are put forward in argument.
    – Nigel J
    Mar 17, 2023 at 9:10
  • It has been my experience, listening to years worth of preaching on Christian radio and from the pulpit of a conservative Baptist church, that dispensational theology (with a pre-millenial and a pre-tribulational rapture of the Church) strongly holds this view of a new temple and sacrifices while Christ reigns on earth. +1 Mar 17, 2023 at 12:16
  • 2
    @MikeBorden - Things must be different for U.K. Baptists. I've never heard any Baptist minister preach on a pre-trib rapture and Christ reigning in Jerusalem for 1,000 years, with a new Temple, a priesthood and animal sacrifices. As for Christian radio broadcasts (or T.V. programmes), I never listen to or watch them - or any videos. Call me old-fashioned but I prefer to get my theology from the Bible and from books written by accredited theologians! :-)
    – Lesley
    Mar 17, 2023 at 17:12

1 Answer 1


I am a Premillennialist scholar, believing Christ will reign for 1000 years on earth, but I believe there is significant biblical evidence that there won't be animal sacrifices nor a temple in the Millennial Kingdom.


He says that sacrifices will be made as an object lesson in memory of past sins, but there's no verse to support this. Hebrews 10:3 is talking about those in the Old Covenant, based on Hebrews 10:1. Animal sacrifices were made under the Old Covenant as atonement for sins (Leviticus 17:11), but this system was made obsolete (Hebrews 8:13) because it cannot take away sin from the conscience (Hebrews 10:11).

Purified Conscience Negates Lessons

Because Jesus' sacrifice purifies our conscience (Hebrews 9:14), sacrifices have ceased forever:

Otherwise, would they not have ceased to be offered, since the worshipers, having once been cleansed, would no longer have any consciousness of sins? (Hebrews 10:2)

Where there is forgiveness of these, there is no longer any offering for sin. (Hebrews 10:18)

He says there'll be a need to teach sinners how offensive sin is, but the reason offerings have already ceased is that now God's laws are already written on the believer's heart (Hebrews 10:16), so much so that the memory of our sin in Christ's mind is put away:

then he adds, “I will remember their sins and their lawless deeds no more.” (Hebrews 10:17

In short, there is no need for an object lesson of the pains of sin when our purified conscience that has God's laws written on it causes God to remember our sins no more. Paul was saying in Hebrews 10:3 that being reminded of sin yearly is a necessary evil, proven in verse 17.

Ezekiel is not Prophecying the Millennial Kingdom

Ezekiel can't be prophesying the Millennial Kingdom for many reasons, most importantly:

And I saw no temple in the city, for its temple is the Lord God the Almighty and the Lamb. (Revelation 21:22)

  • John said that there is no temple in New Jerusalem because Jesus is the Temple (Revelation 21:22), and the same applies to Jesus reigning in the 1000 years.
  • Only those circumcised in flesh may enter the sanctuary (Ezekiel 44:9), but Paul tells us to not circumcise ourselves anymore (I Corinthians 7:18).
  • Offerings are for God's acceptance (Ezekiel 43:27), but Christ accepts the faithful (Romans 5:1).
  • Only the "prince" may eat with the Lord Jesus (Ezekiel 44:3), yet in the Marriage Supper of the Lamb, everyone eats with Him (Revelation 19:9) and fortunately, everyone sees His face (I Corinthians 13:12).

Ezekiel is Prophecying the Third Temple

Ezekiel's Temple has been controversial. His prophecy happened after Solomon's Temple (The First Temple) was destroyed. Some think it was Zerubbabel's Temple or Herod's Temple (The Second Temple), but the dimensions and designs are too different. I mentioned earlier how it can't be the Millennial Kingdom's temple.

This leaves room for one more temple: the Third Temple. Jews have been trying to build it recently, but it's difficult because the Muslim's Dome of the Rock is there. Before the Antichrist comes, the Jews will have succeeded in building Ezekiel's Temple (II Thessalonians 2:4; Revelation 11:1). This makes sense further because the Jews still adhere to many traditions like circumcision. They don't do animal sacrifices because they don't have a temple, but many Jewish leaders want to go back to animal sacrifices once their Third Temple is built.

Some say that can't be the case because the temple and Jesus will dwell forever (Ezekiel 43:7), but notice the phrase "this is the place" and "will" in the verse. God is saying that New Jerusalem and the Millennial Kingdom will be located at the site of Ezekiel's Temple.

Spirit-led Christians Don't Sacrifice

Although many nowadays have the Holy Spirit, most are not led to sacrifice animals in memory of our sins. It wouldn't be logical for Christ to re-instate this after "doing away" with it (Hebrews 10:9-10).


For these reasons, no more animal sacrifices will be made by Holy Spirit-led Christians after Jesus' resurrection.

When the GotQuestions author says "Most premillennial scholars agree", I believe he means that most people who he talks to. There is no poll about this that I'm aware of.

I also wrote more about heaven if interested at Answering Problems.

  • 1
    Thank you for using Hebrews chapter 10 and other Scriptures, such as Revelation 21. I hope to visit your article about heaven later today.
    – Lesley
    Mar 18, 2023 at 12:18
  • 1
    The Wiki article about the Third Temple was insightful and interesting, especially the section on the views of mainstream Christianity.
    – Lesley
    Mar 20, 2023 at 10:14

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .