-3

What New Testament verse (I think it was St. Paul) says that we must first evangelize those who are already in the Church first before making converts of others outside the Church?

2
  • 2
    That seems...unlikely. in Paul's day wouldn't everyone in the church have been evangelized? Or perhaps a passage about evangelizing Jews first? May 25 at 2:48
  • @DJClayworth "a passage about evangelizing Jews first". maybe
    – Geremia
    May 25 at 3:19
1

You may be thinking of Paul in his letter to the Romans:

  • Rom 1:16:

    For I am not ashamed of the gospel, for it is the power of God for salvation to everyone who believes, to the Jew first and also to the Greek.

  • Rom 2:9-10:

    9 There will be tribulation and distress for every human being who does evil, the Jew first and also the Greek, 10 but glory and honor and peace for everyone who does good, the Jew first and also the Greek.

Paul, who considered himself (confirmed by the other apostles) to be Apostle to the Gentiles, might have received the evangelizing priority of the Jews from Jesus himself. This is in line with some gospel passages set before Pentecost, where Jesus and his disciples deliberately focused the announcement of the Kingdom only to the Jews, while making it clear that eventually the Gentiles will be included, as it's obvious from passages in Isaiah.

Relevant passages in Matthew about the priority of the Jews:

  • Instruction to disciples in Matt 10:5-6:

    5 These twelve Jesus sent out, instructing them, “Go nowhere among the Gentiles and enter no town of the Samaritans, 6 but go rather to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.

  • What Jesus said to the Canaanite woman from the district of Tyre and Sidon in Matt 15:24:

    [Jesus] answered, “I was sent only to the lost sheep of the house of Israel.”

  • Matthew is written after Pentecost, several passages about evangelizing the Gentiles:

    Matt 10:16-18:

    16 “Behold, I am sending you out as sheep in the midst of wolves, so be wise as serpents and innocent as doves. 17 Beware of men, for they will deliver you over to courts and flog you in their synagogues, 18 and you will be dragged before governors and kings for my sake, to bear witness before them and the Gentiles.

    Matt 12:15-21:

    15 Jesus, aware of this, withdrew from there. And many followed him, and he healed them all 16 and ordered them not to make him known. 17 This was to fulfill what was spoken by the prophet Isaiah:

    18 “Behold, my servant whom I have chosen,
        my beloved with whom my soul is well pleased.
      I will put my Spirit upon him,
        and he will proclaim justice to the Gentiles.
    19 He will not quarrel or cry aloud,
        nor will anyone hear his voice in the streets;
    20 a bruised reed he will not break,
        and a smoldering wick he will not quench,
       until he brings justice to victory;
    21  and in his name the Gentiles will hope.”
    

John Piper wrote a thorough study on Rom 1:16, listing 6 ways on how the Jews have priority over the Gentiles, 3 ways on how the Jews don't have priority, as well as why Paul mentioned the topic in his letter. From his website article To the Jew First, and Also to the Greek, the 6 ways that Jews have priority are:

  1. They are the historic chosen people of God.

  2. They are the guardians of God’s special revelation, the Old Testament Scriptures.

  3. The Messiah and Savior, Jesus, comes to the world as a Jew to Jews.

  4. Salvation is from the Jews, since everyone who is saved is saved by being connected to the covenant with Abraham by faith.

  5. The Jews are to be evangelized first when the gospel penetrates a new region.

  6. The Jews will enter first into final judgment and final blessing.

For more explanation on Jesus's ministry to the House of Israel first, see the gotquestions.org website article Why did Jesus say that He was sent only to the lost sheep of Israel (Matthew 15:24)?

4
  • Your St. Matthew verses might be what I was thinking of. I remember the verse mentioning the "house of" something.
    – Geremia
    May 25 at 16:30
  • @Geremia I added a resource expanding on Jesus's "House of Israel". Please let me know if there are more to add / clarify. May 25 at 16:36
  • @GratefulDisciple, the two quotations from Matthew are during Jesus's incarnation, when his message was for only Jews. Following the Pentecost when the Church was founded and the disciples received the ability to speak many languages, his message was available to all nations. Hence Paul's statements. ¶ Point 5 (evangelize Jews first) makes sense, since in any new area it would be the Jews that would be most easily able to incorporate the gospel. After a small knowledgeable Christian community had developed, there would be a solid group into which Gentiles could be recruited. May 25 at 20:35
  • @RayButterworth Thank you for your input. I updated my answer with Pre-Pentecost context. BTW, I also heard that Paul's missionary programs were greatly assisted by pre-existing Jewish communities cultivated by trading & banking network as early as 100-200 years BC from where synagogues started later. So in cities where there were Jewish groups already, it makes sense to use Jewish Christians as a base for recruiting Gentiles, and that's probably how Jewish/Gentiles conflict about food / circumcision / morality / pagan morality could have started. May 25 at 21:32
0

I was thinking of Galatians 6:10:

Therefore, whilst we have time, let us work good to all men, but especially to those who are of the household of the faith.

St. Paul shows the proper order of charity, that those closer to us deserve our charity more.

St. Thomas Aquinas commentates:

But because we cannot do good to everyone, he presents the order in which it is to be done, when he adds: but especially to those who are of the household of the faith, who, namely, are not only akin to us in nature but united by faith and grace: “You are no more strangers and foreigners: but you are fellow citizens of the saints and the domestics of God” (Eph 2:19). Therefore mercy must be extended to everyone but preferably to the just who share in the faith, because it is said: “But if any man have not care of his own and especially those of his house, he hath denied the faith and is worse than an infidel” (1 Tim 5:8).

But here it might be asked whether it is lawful to love one more than another. To answer this, it should be noted that love can be called greater or less in two ways. In one way, from the standpoint of the object; in another, from the intensity of the act. For to love someone is to will good to him. Accordingly, one can love one person more than another, either because he wills him a greater good, which is the object of love, or because he more intensely wills him a good, i.e., with a more intense love. Therefore, with respect to the first, we ought to love everyone equally, because we ought to wish the good of eternal life to everyone; but with respect to the second, it is not necessary that we love all equally, because since the intensity of an act results from the principle of the action, and the principle of the action is union and similarity, we ought to love in a higher degree and more intensely those who are more like us and more closely united to us. [cf. Summa Theologica II-II q. 26 on the order of charity]

6
  • What's the connection with evangelism though?
    – curiousdannii
    Sep 5 at 23:10
  • @curiousdannii Evangelization is one kind of act of charity.
    – Geremia
    Sep 5 at 23:11
  • Sure, but Gal 6:10 isn't really about evangelism. What does it mean to evangelise those who are already of faith?
    – curiousdannii
    Sep 5 at 23:12
  • @curiousdannii To make them more convicted in the faith. My question says: "evangelize those who are already in the Church".
    – Geremia
    Sep 5 at 23:27
  • 1
    I agree with @curiousdannii 's observation that this verse isn't really about evangelism. Now that you're able to identify the verse you're thinking of, maybe the question can be changed to "Verse on prioritizing those in the Church first"? I'm okay with deleting my answer if that's the case. That way we don't have to do violence to the meaning of 'evangelism'. There's actually a similar recent question about this scoped to Reformed tradition. Sep 6 at 2:21

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.