3

Since Jesus was in the royal line, it seems likely he had contemporaries in the royal line also. Is it possible to estimate how many legitimate candidates for King of Israel lived at the time of Jesus, based on genealogies? Do we have any historical record of such people?

4

None of the seed of David, through Jeconiah, could ever inherit the throne of David due to the curse upon Jeconiah recorded by the prophet Jeremiah.

Jeremiah states of Jeconiah, king of Judah :

Thus saith the LORD, Write ye this man childless, a man that shall not prosper in his days: for no man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David, and ruling any more in Judah. [Jeremiah 22:30 KJV]

Of this curse upon not only Jeconiah himself but on the succession of any king to the throne who was of that seed, Matthew Henry's commentary records the following :

Now that which is here to be taken notice of is that Jeconiah is written childless (v. 30), that is, as it follows, No man of his seed shall prosper, sitting upon the throne of David. In him the line of David was extinct as a royal line

Biblehub - Jeremiah

Thus only Jesus, the child of Mary (and the child of Mary's husband Joseph) who, alone, inherited all the rights to the throne from Joseph, but inherited none of the curse, being not of the seed of Jeconiah by natural generation.

Ellicott also comments :

The meaning of the prediction, as explained by the latter clause of the verse, was fulfilled in Jeconiah’s being the last kingly representative of the house of David, his uncle Zedekiah, who succeeded him, perishing before him (Jeremiah 52:31). In him the sceptre departed, and not even Zerubbabel sat upon the throne of Judah.

Biblehub - Ellicott

| improve this answer | |
  • Would this not also be true for any other adopted child and their descendants along the way? – Please stop being evil Aug 24 at 19:05
  • 1
    How could Jesus be the only descendent of David who was not also a descendent of Jeconiah? What about Mary's brothers, cousins, second cousins etc? – matt2048 Aug 25 at 5:52
  • @matt2048 Mary was a 'close relative' of Elizabeth who was 'of the daughters of Aaron', thus of the tribe of Levi. Mary, herself, had no part in Judah (other than marriage to Joseph) and had no personal part in the royal line through David. The royal line comes from David through Joseph, but cannot come by natural generation because of the curse on Jeconiah. – Nigel J Aug 25 at 8:39
  • Would there have been anyone descended from David and not descended from Jeconiah? – matt2048 Aug 26 at 8:28
  • @matt2048 That would not have been a direct (and therefore a royal) line.I suggest you read up on the subject. It is widely, and extensively, documented. – Nigel J Aug 26 at 8:34

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.