Jehovah’s Witnesses believe that Jesus Christ is a created being. What is the Biblical basis for this position?

  • 2
    Surprisingly this doesn't seem to have been asked before, or at least I can't find it. I'm a bit concerned that if you don't limit it to a particular denomination that rejects the divinity of Jesus (and there are a lot!) that this would become too broad. Also Jesus being created is slightly different from Jesus not being divine, and there are sure to be complex nuances there if it's left open.
    – curiousdannii
    Commented Jan 20, 2020 at 0:56
  • 1
    Well we have several JWs on this site, but I don't know any Unitarians, here or in real life. Based on the stats on Wikipedia there could be up to 8 times as many JWs as Unitarians.
    – curiousdannii
    Commented Jan 20, 2020 at 1:20
  • 1
    christianity.stackexchange.com/q/65988/23657. Notice how this related question was focused and see the answers it received. Your question here could be edited to ask “according to JWs what is the biblical basis for saying Jesus is a created being?”
    – 007
    Commented Jan 20, 2020 at 1:44
  • 1
    You can edit your question to specify one denomination and expect to receive answers from that denominational POV.
    – 007
    Commented Jan 20, 2020 at 1:54
  • 2
    The question looks good now and I plan to give an answer but it will have to be tomorrow it is 10:35 pm here.
    – 007
    Commented Jan 20, 2020 at 3:34

1 Answer 1


Taking a look at this Watchtower article scriptural citations appear to be from The Common Bible. I believe this is a 1973 edition of the revised standard version.

The apostle Paul wrote concerning Jesus Christ:

He is the image of the invisible God, the first-born of all creation; for in him all things were created, in heaven and on earth, visible and invisible, whether thrones or dominions or principalities or authorities—all things were created through him and for him. He is before all things, and in him all things hold together.”—Col. 1:15-17

Looking at Paul’s further words helps explain what is meant by the phrase firstborn of all creation:

He is the head of the body, the church; he is the beginning, the first-born from the dead, that in everything he might be pre-eminent.”—Col. 1:18

The Greek words for both “first-born” (protótokos) and “beginning” (arkhé) show Jesus as the first one of a group or class, “the body, the church,” meaning that he has preeminence in this respect. Jesus also has preeminence in another class as the firstborn of the dead. This means Jesus is the first one resurrected to endless life from among all the human dead.—1 Cor. 15:22, 23.

These same Greek words are found in the Greek Septuagint translation at Genesis 49:3:

Ruben, thou art my first-born [protótokos], thou my strength, and the first [arkhé, “beginning”] of my children.”

We believe that biblical statements like these make it reasonable to conclude that the Son of God is the firstborn of all creation in the sense of being the first of God’s creatures. Jesus in fact refers to himself as “the beginning [arkhé] of God’s creation.” (Rev. 3:14,).

Most professed Christians object to the idea of Jesus as being a created person. They believe that Jesus is himself Almighty God, the second person of a “trinity” of three coequal, coeternal persons in one “godhead.”

Trinitarians protest that the Greek expression (at Revelation 3:14) for “the beginning of God’s creation” means “the origin (or ‘primary source’) of the creation of God.” One Greek scholar,Henry Alford, takes this viewpoint as correct. However he concedes in his work “The Greek Testament”: “The mere word arkhé would admit the meaning that Christ is the first created being”. Thus he notes that this is why Arians taught that Colossians 1:15 is in effect saying [“the first and most excellent of all God’s works”]

The book The Expositors Greek Testament says: “to understand Revelation 3:14 as meaning that Jesus is “the active source” of creation, rather than the first created person, one must interpret arkhé “as in Greek philosophy and [non-Biblical] Jewish wisdom-literature,=aitía or origin.”

But it is clear that bible writers did not follow Greek philosophy.

Some would argue, if Jesus is a created being explain the phraseology “in him all things were created”.

On occasion the Bible uses “all” in a way that allows for exceptions. For example, we read at 1 Corinthians 15:27:

But when it says, ‘All things are put in subjection under him [Jesus Christ],’ it is plain that he [God] is excepted who put all things under him.”

Also consider that the Bible states that “through one man,” Adam, “death spread to all men.” (Rom. 5:12) Was Adam part of the “all men” to whom death “spread”? No. Because previous to Adam there was no human who could have spread death to him. Adam was nonetheless a man.

In this way we can reason that although Jesus was not part of the “all things” that came into existence through him, he was, nevertheless, a created person, the very first creature of God.

Since Jehovah’s witnesses are convinced that Jesus is a created person, we understand that he cannot be Almighty God.

This is why we point repeatedly to verses that portray him as in a position subordinate to God. For example, the apostle Paul said about the resurrected Jesus :

I want you to understand that the head of every man is Christ, the head of a woman is her husband, and the head of Christ is God.” (1 Cor. 11:3)

And notice the words of Jesus to John in Revelation 3:12 Jesus said concerning himself

He who conquers, I will make him a pillar in the temple of my God; never shall he go out of it, and I will write on him the name of my God, and the name of the city of my God, the new Jerusalem which comes down from my God out of heaven, and my own new name.

Four times in this verse alone Jesus refers to his Father, Jehovah, as “my God”.

We do not teach that Jesus did not exist before he became a human born of Mary. Nor do we teach that Jesus is just another angel.

We recognize the exalted position that Jesus occupies next to God. Before ascending to heaven, Jesus said to his disciplesjust before ascending to heaven

All authority in heaven and on earth has been given to me.” (Matt. 28:18)

It was appropriate for Jehovah to ‘give’ to his Son such authority, since Jesus is the firstborn (preeminent) of all creatures. Right in line with this exalted preeminent position granted to Jesus the apostle Paul wrote concerning him:

[God] raised him from the dead and made him sit at his right hand in the heavenly places, far above all rule and authority and power and dominion, and above every name that is named, not only in this age but also in that which is to come; and he has put all things under his feet and has made him the head over all things for the church.”—Eph. 1:20-23

For more info on the name that is above all names see this answer to a related question.

  • Revelation 1:1, the revelation was given to Jesus by God. If Jesus was God, then how would any revelation need to be given? There's no revealing of something to someone who already knows it, is there? Also, 1 Timothy 2:5 comes to mind (isn't a mediator someone who is independent of any of the parties that the mediation is between?) and John 5: "Son only imitates Father's example" (v19), "judging entrusted to the Son" (v22), "Son been sent by Father"(v23), "Son granted to have life in himself" and "given authority to judge" (v26,27), "Son seeking his Father's will, not his own" (30).
    – Mr. Donutz
    Commented Jan 20, 2020 at 21:52
  • @Mr.Donutz those are good points too. This question is specifically asking for biblical basis for JW belief that Jesus is a created being. You may like to offer an answer as well.
    – 007
    Commented Jan 20, 2020 at 22:00
  • Ultimately, JWs belief is based on and must be in line with Scripture. I think it's more useful to add up to your answer, since I think it's well to the point and covering a good bit of material already. The amount of material available on jw.org alone and elsewhere, including the Bible, is so much that there could be dozens, if not hundreds of answers, arguing the same point. So I'd rather contribute to a single answer that gives a sufficiently broad explanation, if you don't mind. I don't know if there's something like a chat function available at my rep to make such a contribution easier...
    – Mr. Donutz
    Commented Jan 20, 2020 at 22:05
  • @Mr.Donutz If you want to go to chat and are unsure what to do, simply flag a question, answer or comment and request a moderator to move your conversation to chat.
    – Ken Graham
    Commented Jan 21, 2020 at 11:34
  • @KenGraham Thanks for the advice. I'll have to put this aside for a little bit, but just noticed that it works; Kris had made a room for this purpose. Sadly, something cropped up here that I need to deal with fairly soon, but it's good to know that discussion can take place in the background to have some co-operation towards a complete answer if possible. I do love accurate answers, and one of those is better than loads of answers that highlight a small aspect of a matter.
    – Mr. Donutz
    Commented Jan 21, 2020 at 15:15

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .