Catholic tradition tells us that Jesus fell three times under the weight of the cross on His way to Calvary. I wish to know if any studies based on historical evidence have been conducted by Catholic Church on the dimensions and weight of the cross that Jesus bore. For instance, was the cross made of dry wood or out of freshly felled tree ?

  • 3
    1 cross is equal to the sins of the world. It's one of those old conversions, like bushels and pecks.
    – user3961
    Commented Oct 5, 2019 at 5:37
  • Several mystics reveal that Christ fell several times more than just three times.
    – Ken Graham
    Commented Oct 6, 2019 at 1:11

1 Answer 1


How much did the Cross of Jesus weigh?

30At that time ‘they will say to the mountains, “Fall on us!” and to the hills, “Cover us!”’ 31For if men do these things while the tree is green, what will happen when it is dry?” 32Two others, who were criminals, were also led away to be executed with Jesus.… - Luke 23:30-32

The Cross on which Our Savior was crucified seems to be made of pine:

A microscopic examination of the fragments of the Cross scattered through the world in the form of relics reveals the fact that it was made from a pine-tree (Rohault de Fleury, "Mémoire sur les instruments de la Passion", Paris, 1870, 63). According to an ancient, but somewhat dubious, tradition the Cross of Jesus Christ measured in length very nearly 189 inches (4.80 metres), from 90½ to 102½ inches (2.30 to 2.60 metres). As noted by the Evangelists, two thieves were crucified, one on either side of Christ. Their crosses must have resembled the one on which He suffered; in Christian art and tradition they generally appear lower (St. John Chrysostom, Hom. i, xxvi, on I Cor.; on Rom., v, 5). A large portion of the cross of the good thief (traditionally known as Dismas) is preserved at Rome in the altar of the Chapel of the Relics at Santa Croce in Gerusalemme. - The crucifixion of Jesus Christ (Catholic Encyclopedia)

There are no exact figures available as to what the Cross truly weighed, but tradition is that Jesus only carried the heavy patibulum, the crossbar to the place of crucifixion.

In John 19:17, John says Jesus carried the cross while in Matthew 27:32, Mark 15:21 and Luke 23:26 we are informed that Simon of Cyrene helped Jesus to carry the cross. There are no exact figures on the weight of the cross. It is believed to have been made of solid wood , so the whole cross is estimated to be over 300 pounds (136 kilograms) while the crossbar is estimated to be around 70-90 pounds (32-41 kilograms). - What is the weight of the cross that Jesus carried?

This article puts the weight of Christ’s crossbar from 75-125 lbs or 34-57kgs); 5-6 ft long (or 1.5-1.8 m long). Jesus probably only carried the patibulum portion of the Cross:

The episode is mentioned, without much detail, in all the canonical Gospels: Matthew 27:31–33, Mark 15:20–22, Luke 23:26–32 and John 19:16–18. Only John specifically says Jesus carried his cross, and all but John include Simon of Cyrene, who was recruited by the soldiers from the crowd to carry or help carry the cross. Modern scholars, following descriptions of criminals carrying crossbars by Plautus and Plutarch, often take the Gospel description as meaning Jesus, then Simon, carried only a heavy patibulum, the crossbar, to a pole, stipes, which was permanently driven into the ground at Golgotha. However, in Christian imagery Jesus, and Simon, carry the complete cross—both patibulum and stipes. - Christ Carrying the Cross

Christ at the Cross by Carl Bloch, painting c. 1870

Christ at the Cross by Carl Bloch, painting c. 1870

Many Catholics hold that Our Lord's Cross was low to the ground as the above painting suggests and that He was pierced with a lance and not a spear as is commonly displayed in many Crucifixion scenes.

Biblical references:

The lance (Greek: λόγχη, lonkhē) is mentioned in the Gospel of John (19:31–37), but not the Synoptic Gospels. The gospel states that the Romans planned to break Jesus' legs, a practice known as crurifragium, which was a method of hastening death during a crucifixion. Just before they did so, they realized that Jesus was already dead and that there was no reason to break his legs. To make sure that he was dead, a Roman soldier (named in extra-Biblical tradition as Longinus) stabbed him in the side.

One of the soldiers pierced his side with a lance (λόγχη), and immediately there came out blood and water. — John 19:34

Holy Lance (Wikipedia)

Three types of crosses commonly used by the Roman army

Three types of crosses commonly used by the Roman army

Pictured are three types of crosses commonly used by the Roman army in the first century A.D. Each carried an inscription stating the victim's capital offense and a seat-like projection, not designed for the victim's comfort, but to prolong their agony. Nails and ropes held the victim's legs and arms in place.

The cross on the left was called a “high tau” cross because it was shaped like the capital Greek letter tau (“T”). The middle cross was known as a “low tau” cross, shaped like the lower case tau (“t”). In both cases the central post was generally set permanently in the ground while the cross bar was carried to the site by the victim. The cross on the right was an actual tree still in the ground (dead or alive) with its limbs serving as the cross bar. Jesus was probably crucified on a “low tau” type cross. - What kind of cross was Jesus crucified on?

I would like to recommend the following books:

A Doctor at Calvary: The Passion of Our Lord Jesus Christ as Described by a Surgeon by Pierre Barbet M.D. to those who genuinely desire what the physical sufferings Our Lord went through in his Crucifixion. It is not for the squeamish.

Another Doctor at Calvary What does medicine tell us about the Passion of Our Lord? Thomas McGovern, MD

  • Taking the Gospel narrative at face value, if the vertical pole was carried, it must have been long enough to extend far enough into the ground to make a stable structure that would not fall over under its own weight, and far enough above ground to raise the victim's feet into the air, and to make the references to the guards using spears intelligible. Many of the depictions in visual art are too short to satisfy those criteria. A length of 4.8m would seem plausible from an engineering point of view.
    – alephzero
    Commented Feb 14, 2019 at 23:59
  • @alephzero Scholars think Jesus carried the crossbar portion the cross and not the vertical portion of the Cross to the place of crucifixion.
    – Ken Graham
    Commented Feb 15, 2019 at 22:07
  • 1
    Though I appreciate Catholic relics as a reference here, a non- believer is skeptical of such a thing's provenance. I think you could bolster this answer with a more scholarly reference that the cross would likely be made of this pine.
    – user3961
    Commented Oct 5, 2019 at 5:42
  • 1
    @fredsbend Thanks for the thought. But apparently it is not at all that easy as to what type of wood the Cross is made of. I believe Rome had tests done and they were inconclusive.
    – Ken Graham
    Commented Oct 5, 2019 at 12:13

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .