4

In 1 Corinthians 1:10-12 - (“10 I appeal to you, brothers, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that all of you agree, and that there be no divisions among you, but that you be united in the same mind and the same judgment. 11 For it has been reported to me by Chloe’s people that there is quarreling among you, my brothers. 12 What I mean is that each one of you says, “I follow Paul,” or “I follow Apollos,” or “I follow Cephas,” or “I follow Christ.””)

Paul begins talking about the divisions within the church at Corinth. Were these divisions each a "house church" or were they divisions within a single church that met together?

• Follow up question 1 - Reading 1 Corinthians 11:17-18 (instructions on the Lord's Supper) it seems that it was one church that gathered together and not house churches. If the church of Corinth was a church that met in a single location - where did they meet? Would a home be large enough?

• Follow up question 2 - If the church in Corinth is a collection of house churches, then the divisions clearly represent a fragmentation of the early church. How was this fragmentation halted? Was it to move towards a single meeting location - as evidenced by early church structures that begin to appear around 200/300 AD?(https://archive.archaeology.org/0709/abstracts/churches.html) https://www.christianitytoday.com/history/2008/november/why-and-when-did-christians-start-constructing-special.html

  • 1
    They all met together in a single place : 'when ye be gathered together I Cor 5:4. Many of them were being divisive : 'one saith ... and another ...'. I Cor 3:4. The situation was halted by Paul writing the epistle to them. (see the whole of II Corinthians). – Nigel J Jun 20 '18 at 15:54
2

It really doesn't matter where they were meeting. Paul addresses the letter to the church.

Unto the church of God which is at Corinth, to them that are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called to be saints, with all that in every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both theirs and ours: 1 Cor. 1:2

He could just as well be speaking directly to us as them.

To your question though, at that time they very likely would have been meeting in one house, but given the nature of the contentions (I am of Apollos, I am of Paul, I am of Christ, etc; IOW, my lineage is better than yours, naynaynay), it is not impossible that they were already meetings in different houses.

Perhaps they were meeting in the woman Chloe's house. There is lots of speculation about who she was, but obviously she had the Apostle Paul's ear. He trusted, he listened to her. She was important. Like with Christ's ministry, it was supported by very important, well-to-do women.

And Joanna the wife of Chuza Herod's steward, and Susanna, and many others, which ministered unto him of their substance. Luke 8:3

If, however, they were meeting in different houses, which is very doubtful, how was the division stopped? Clearly it wasn't. See the letter of Clement to the Corinthians. See also the history of Christianity.

Point is that distance, time, heritage, location is not as important as what is believed.

Now I beseech you, brethren, by the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye all speak the same thing, and that there be no divisions among you; but that ye be perfectly joined together in the same mind and in the same judgment. 1 Cor. 1:10

2

The church in Corinth began in 52 A.D. when Paul went there on his second missionary journey. Paul’s first letter to the Christians in Corinth was written about 55 A.D. Corinth was a large, prosperous and commercial Greek city with a population in excess of 500,000 persons. Acts 18:1-18 describes the events leading up to the establishment of the “church” in Corinth. Paul stayed with Aquila and Priscilla, and with Titius Justus, “and many of the Corinthians who heard him believed and were baptised.” Paul stayed in Corinth for a year and a half, teaching also in the Jewish synagogue. There is every reason to believe that the Christians in Corinth met in different homes. During Paul’s lifetime, believers would commonly meet in a house: “… greet the church that is in their house” (Romans 16:5). “The church” did not refer to different groups, but to the body of believers who came together for fellowship and worship.

The “divisions” among the believers refers to the “church” as a group, and not to any individual “house church.” The Christians in Corinth were full of pride and were excusing sexual immorality: “It is actually reported that there is sexual immorality among you, and of a kind that is not tolerated even among pagans, for a man has his father’s wife. And you are arrogant! Ought you not rather to mourn? Let him who has done this be removed from among you” (1 Corinthians 5:1-2). The believers in Corinth were following different spiritual leaders: “What I mean is that each one of you says, “I follow Paul,” or “I follow Apollos,” or “I follow Cephas,” or “I follow Christ” (1 Corinthians 1:12). Spiritual gifts were being used improperly (chapters 12-13), and there was misunderstanding of key Christian doctrines such as the resurrection (chapter 15).

The NIV Study Bible notes shed some light on the Lord’s Supper described in 1 Corinthians 11:17-21: "The early church held the ‘agape’ (love) feast in connection with the Lord’s Supper (cf. 2 Peter 2:13; Jude 12). Perhaps the meal was something like a present-day bring-and-share supper. In good Greek style they brought food for all to share, the rich bringing more and the poor less, but because of their cliques the rich ate much and the poor were left hungry.”

Given the glorious weather in that part of the world, I imagine they would meet out of doors or in the central courtyard of the villa of a rich Corinthian. Perhaps the divisions among them resulted in splinter groups breaking off and meeting separately, but nothing is said about that, and no amount of speculation is going to help. However, an understanding of what the Greek word for “church” means is helpful:

Ekklesia is a Greek word defined as “a called-out assembly or congregation.” This word is the basis for our English words ecclesiastical (“pertaining to the church”) and ecclesiology (“the study of doctrine concerning the church”). Ekklesia is commonly translated as “church” in the New Testament. Paul said: “For I am the least of the apostles, unworthy to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God” (1 Corinthians 15:9). He was referring to the body of believers living in many different locations, not just to people who met in a building or a house.

In his address to the Sanhedrin, Stephen calls the people of Israel “the assembly [ekklesia] in the wilderness” (Acts 7:38). And in Acts 19:39, ekklesia refers to a convening of citizens to discuss legal matters. However, in most contexts, the word ekklesia is used to refer to the people who comprise the New Testament church. The “called-out assembly” is a congregation of believers whom God has called out of the world and “into His wonderful light” (1 Peter 2:9). That is the meaning of the word “church” as it is applied to the body of Christian believers – wherever they are.

After Titus had been sent by Paul to the Corinthians, Paul’s second letter (written before 57 A.D.) shows how the Corinthian Christians were grieved into repenting (2 Corinthians 5:7-9). That is how the fragmentation was halted. Buildings specifically used for meetings of the local church probably did not arise till after Christianity was accepted by Emperor Constantine.

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.