According to the catholic doctrine, Jesus is "true God and true human." That nature of Him was taken in order to redeem the humanity of sin.

My question is:

Since he is God since all times, did he become true human in the incarnation or he was already man before it?

If He has became human there, and now He is human also nowadays due to His simple and eternal attributes, excent (indifferent, alien, unaffected, etc) of time and space:

Wouldn't He has to been human since all times since He lives in eternity?

  • 1
    For your question to work here, you would need to specify a particular group or denomination of Christians whose answer you want. Otherwise there could be many different answers depending on the perspective of the one answering—which isn't what this site is for. See: What topics can I ask about here? Dec 1, 2017 at 0:38

2 Answers 2


Since he is God since all times, did he become true human in the incarnation or he was already man before it?

No, He did not always have a human nature.

As St. John writes in the Gospel:

John 1:1,14 (DRB)

...the Word was God. ... And the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us.

St. Paul writes to the church at Philippi concerning the humility of the Son of God in becoming flesh for our salvation:

Philippians 2:5-8

For let this mind be in you, which was also in Christ Jesus: Who being in the form of God, thought it not robbery to be equal with God: but emptied himself, taking the form of a servant, being made in the likeness of men, and in habit found as a man. He humbled himself, becoming obedient unto death, even to the death of the cross.

The Hypostatic Union

The Hypostatic Union is the doctrine that the two natures of Christ (the eternal divine, and the temporal human nature) are united in only one Person: the divine Word or Son of God.

This is why we can say "the First and the Last," and "the Lord of Glory," (1 Corinthians 2:8) that is, God, "died:"

Revelation 1:17-18

And when I had seen him, I fell at his feet as dead. And he laid his right hand upon me, saying: Fear not. I am the First and the Last, and [am] alive, [though] was dead, and behold I am [alive] for ever and ever, and have the keys of death and of hell.

And it's why Jesus can say, though not true of His human nature, but His divine only:

John 8:58 (cf. Exodus 3:14) ... Amen, amen I say to you, before Abraham was [made], I am.

That is, simply put, anything belonging to either nature belongs to the one divine Person: the Word or Son of God. Anything predicated of either nature is predicated of the Son of God. Or, anything the Person does in either nature, He does as the Divine Person: there is no human person in Jesus Christ, only one Divine Person with two natures.

Therefore, the answer to your question

Wouldn't He have to have been human since all time, since He lives in eternity?

is no, since the natures are distinct, and are not confused nor admixed. Only the human nature of Christ died, properly speaking. Only the Divine nature of Christ created all things. But Christ (i.e. a Person) indeed did both in truth.

A Pertinent Example

A very simple doctrine which gets to the heart of the issue is the doctrine that Mary, Jesus' mother, is the mother of God (it is, fundamentally, a Christological doctrine).

In the fourth century, a heretic named Nestorius made a divison, rather than a simple distinction, between the two natures of Christ, so as to assert that we may not properly call Mary, his mother, the mother of God, but only Christ.

(emphasis mine)

The heresy is summarized by the Ecumenical Second Council of Constantinople's condemnation of it in A.D. 533 (Sentence Against the Three Chapters of Nestorius):

The holy synod of Ephesus… has pronounced sentence against the heresy of Nestorius… and all those who might later ... adopt the same opinions as he held ... They express these falsehoods against the true dogmas of the Church, offering worship to two Sons, trying to divide that which cannot be divided, and introducing to both heaven and earth the offense of the worship of man. But the sacred band of heavenly spirits worship along with us only one Lord Jesus Christ.

Even earlier than this, and directly addressing a specific heretical product of his false Christology (that Mary was only the mother of a human nature, and not of the divine Person of God the Word), the Ecumenical Council of Ephesus (A.D. 431) issues the following anathema (Session I, Canon 1):

If anyone will not confess that the Emmanuel is very God, and that therefore the Holy Virgin is the Mother of God [Θεοτόκος], inasmuch as in the flesh she bore the Word of God made flesh [as it is written, "The Word was made flesh"] let him be anathema.

(emphasis mine)

What this goes to prove is that clearly Jesus was born, but this particular heretic asserted that He was not personally God who was born (the fallacious argumenting being that God was never born; yet in that He had this human nature in addition to the divine, He was born). Whereas, as the condemnation notes, Mary's Son is Immanuel (God with us), and the eternal Word of God made flesh. In this sense, she most definitely is the mother of God.

  • Ok, excellent answer. Thank you so much. Now I'm curious: As David says, Do you believe in an atemporal God (like us)? Dec 2, 2017 at 3:14
  • This is too deep a topic to discuss in comments. But yes, I believe that God is outside time. The relation of time to eternity is up for debate, but that God does not have a beginning, and is therefore eternal, I believe is not debatable. Dec 2, 2017 at 12:53

One way to sort this important theological point out is to ask whether John 1:1 could be translated in Catholic and Protestant translations as, "In the beginning was Jesus, and Jesus was with God". Also, to ask, could verse 14 be translated, "And Jesus was made flesh"?

However, the Greek scriptures are clear that the word 'Jesus' never appears in John's gospel, chapter 1, for the first 28 verses, but thereafter 'Jesus' is written frequently, because the one who could be identified as this human - Jesus - had begun to dwell among humanity, as one of them. Not before.

It is to be noted that groups such as Unitarians would have no problem translating John 1:14 as "...and Jesus became flesh". Indeed, there was a question about that back in early November 2022, asking if any Trinitarian denominations use John chapter 1 to teach that, "In the beginning was Jesus".

However, I doubt if there is Catholic literature that even suggests that there was an eternal Jesus, the man. Yes, it clearly says there was an eternal Word of God, and an eternal Son of God, because that is what the Bible states. But the Bible never says there was an eternal Jesus, which is why no Trinitarian groups say that either.

It is a very important point, and clarity is needed, for there had to come a time when the Son of God (also known as the Word of God) veiled his heavenly glory to become 'lowered' to become man. This was in order to die as a sinless human. Jesus came into existence at the point of the Holy Spirit wondrously overshadowing the virgin Mary. But not until.

"And the Word was made flesh, and dwelt among us" as the man, Jesus. John adds in his first epistle:

"That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the Word of life; (For the life was manifested, and we have seen it, and bear witness, and shew unto you that eternal life, which was with the Father, and was manifested unto us) That which we have seen and heard declare we unto you, that ye also may have fellowship with us: and truly our fellowship is with the Father, and with his Son Jesus Christ." 1 John 1:1-3

Note the order of events? The Word of life was from the beginning; that life was manifested in visible, tangible form for humans to bear witness to; that manifested life is experienced by other humans in fellowship. That fellowship is with a person - the Son of the Father, Jesus Christ.

But until the Word of life added human nature to his divine nature, there was no person called Jesus with whom anyone could have fellowship. The fellowship of the triune God was the Father with the Son and the Holy Spirit, in heaven. That is what Unitarians cannot agree with Trinitarian Christians about, and that is why there needs to be clarity on this point.

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .