11

I was reading some publications jw.org online library about the Jehovah's Witnesses beliefs pertaining to the end of the world, such as this article from which I quote below snippet:

5 What yet unseen event will take place next? Paul stated: “Whenever it is that they are saying: ‘Peace and security!’ then sudden destruction is to be instantly upon them.” The first phase of this “sudden destruction” is the attack against “Babylon the Great,” the world empire of false religion, also known as “the harlot.” (Rev. 17:5, 6, 15) That attack against all forms of false religion, including Christendom, is the start of the “great tribulation.” (Matt. 24:21; 2 Thess. 2:8) For many, this event will come as a surprise. Why? Because up to that point, the harlot will confidently view herself as “a queen” who will “never see mourning.” But she will suddenly discover that she has miscalculated her chances of survival. She will be wiped out rather quickly, as if “in one day.”—Rev. 18:7, 8.

6 God’s Word identifies the harlot’s attacker as a “wild beast” with “ten horns.” A study of the book of Revelation shows that the wild beast refers to the United Nations (UN). “The ten horns” represent all present political powers that support this “scarlet-colored wild beast.”* (Rev. 17:3, 5, 11, 12) How devastating will the attack be? The nations of the UN will plunder the harlot’s wealth, expose her real character, devour her, and “completely burn her.” Her destruction will be final.

What I wanted to know is, is this some modern idea among Jehovah's Witnesses that United Nations will attack religion? Or since when have they believed that this is what those events in the book of Revelation refer to?

0

3 Answers 3

6

Even before the United Nations existed, Jehovah's Witnesses have held the position that the United Nations is going to destroy false religion. The belief originates from back when its predecessor, the League of Nations, was formed in 1920.

Christian clergymen at that time were heralding the League of Nations as the organization that would bring about the Kingdom of God. This was seen as a big warning sign to the Bible Students at that time, since 1914 was believed to have been when Jesus began ruling over God's Kingdom from heaven, and the League of Nations was clearly being formed as mankind's attempt at world peace, not God's.

Here are some older Watchtower publications which describe these events:

8
  • thank you for the answer, @4castle. It's interesting and informative, but I just now realized that your statement "Even before the United Nations existed, Jehovah's Witnesses have held the position that the United Nations is going to destroy false religion." is not in itself supported by the references. I mean, your references do bring out that JWs were of the opinion that the LoN / UN will ultimately fail, but they do not bring out that they would launch an attack on religion. Do you have any old references where specifically the attack on religion by LoN or UN is mentioned?
    – user35972
    Commented Nov 25, 2017 at 16:16
  • @ben.g I've added one more article in order to try to tie things together. The prophecy about the "disgusting thing" of Matthew 24:15-16 is used to identify who would destroy false religion.
    – user32540
    Commented Nov 25, 2017 at 19:39
  • 1
    thanks, I can see the explicit statement along those lines in that 1954 "Is World Unity a Dream?" article.
    – user35972
    Commented Nov 25, 2017 at 20:01
  • @4castle Ho bro. You might find this interesting for this sight. w18 April p. 30 Questions From Readers
    – user43190
    Commented Feb 23, 2019 at 16:59
  • @ethos I appreciate your concern. I believe my use of these articles falls under Fair Use due to the quotations being partial, credited, non-commercial, and scholarly in nature, but I will carefully consider editing my answers to direct people to jw.org.
    – user32540
    Commented Feb 23, 2019 at 19:11
4

On this note, I have a booklet titled "Peace - Can It Last?" published by Jehovah's Witnesses in 1942. It's an interesting title, as it was published in the middle of the Second World War. It looks like this:

cover and inside cover

In this booklet, they said that the conflict between the King of the North and the King of the South (from the book of Daniel, chapter 11) would continue until Armageddon. They also stated that because of this, the League of Nations, which had become defunct due to the war, would be reinstated. This interpretation was based on their understanding of the "beast" in Revelation 17:8.

To summarize, the "beast" represents the world body of governments, initially The League of Nations. It was full of "blasphemous names" because it was claimed to be able to do something only God's Kingdom will be able to do, i.e., bring world peace. The prostitute riding the beast symbolizes religious organizations.

This booklet is from a time before they had their New World Translation, so the scriptures are quoted from the American Revised Version, also known as the American Standard Version.

Quote from pages 21 and 22, regarding the reinstatement of the League:

Will the League remain in the pit? Again the Word of God gives answer: The beast that thou sawest was, and is not; and is about to come up out of the abyss, and to go into perdition. And they that dwell on the earth shall wonder, they whose name hath not been written in the book of life from the foundation of the world, when they behold the beast, how that he was, and is not, and shall be present (Revelation 17:8, Am. Rev. Ver., margin) The association of worldly nations will rise again. The fight between “the king of the north” and the “king of the south”, being for WORLD domination, makes such an outcome of this total war unavoidable. The necessities of meeting the totalitarian aggressions and stopping them are forcing the nations to that final confederation of nations for the new order, whatever its form.

pages 21 and 22

And from page 26, regarding the reinstated League attacking religion:

But what shall befall the “woman Babylon”, “organized religion,” riding the beast? At the end of that “one hour” of the rulers with the beast, they will be forced to see the hypocrisy of religion and that it deceived them with false hopes and led them into a hopeless position with destruction as the only outcome. The prophetic word reads: “And the ten horns which thou sawest, and the beast, these shall hate the harlot, and shall make her desolate and naked, and shall eat her flesh, and shall burn her utterly with fire. For God did put in their hearts to do his mind, and to come to one mind, and to give their kingdom unto the beast, until the words of God should be accomplished.” (Revelation 17:16, 17, Am. Rev. Ver.) Will the religionists and all other persecutors of Jehovah’s witnesses take note, please, that it is not Jehovah’s faithful witnesses that will thus violently break up “organized religion”! The world powers will do it, the very ones with whom religion is committing spiritual fornication by making common cause with them against Jehovah's Theocracy and those who bear witness to it.

pages 26 and 27

3
  • 2
    I took the trouble to read the text not enclosed in the red boxes, which makes me wonder. The one above goes on to say, "Organized religion, called Christendom..." And the one above it explicitly highlights "Vatican City" as the main (?) part of this wanton woman, 'Babylon the Great'. But what about non-Christian religion, like Islam, Buddhism, Hinduism, Shintoism etc? I've got masses of JW literature at home and never read about them, yet they are also organized religions. Why no mention of them?
    – Anne
    Commented May 21 at 12:35
  • 1
    @Anne, yea good question. I was wondering about the negative references to organized religion. I mean aren't JWs an "organized religion"? But an expression "Religion is a Snare and a Racket" in one of the old booklets and a search on the JW site led me to this quote “This was the time when we did not designate ‘true religion’ and ‘false religion’; all religion in totality was bad. The true we referred to as ‘worship,’ while the false was ‘religion.’” So maybe "organized religion" meant "all organized false religion".
    – Michael R
    Commented May 22 at 2:33
  • 1
    Yes, JWs do seem to think of ALL religion apart from themselves as being "false religion", though their printed statements go on about "Christendom" with hardly a mention of non-Christian religions. But when I pulled out one of their old books (prompted by your comment) I found enough material to actually answer this question with a direct, dated quotation about the U.N. launching the attack asked about. It's just been posted..
    – Anne
    Commented May 22 at 11:48
1

Reading the OPs quotes, and both remaining answers to this question, caused me to search amongst my considerable collection of Jehovah’s Witness publications (some of it going back more than a century). One book does deal with the United Nations, and also the Jehovah’s Witness view of ‘Christendom’ in relation to all other ‘false religion’. Of course, they do not consider themselves to be either a part of ‘Christendom’, nor part of any ‘false religion’. They believe they will be the only religion to survive after Armageddon.

Here is what I gleaned from this old book, which, I understand, has never been studied by today’s generation of Jehovah’s Witnesses. Although the U.N. is rarely mentioned, and likewise the League of Nations, this sets the scene for their interpretation of the harlot of Revelation and the beast she rides. The quote starts after mention of how God confused the languages of the people at Babel:

“By this Jehovah showed his power to break up any world unification of mankind for a purpose against his will. The United Nations, which has its skyscraper capital in New York city and which glorifies man’s assumed ability to make world peace, is no exception to this…[Back to the ancient tower of Babel]

…In the Bible’s very first book babel or Babylon became a symbol of a mimic theocracy, or rebellion against the universal sovereignty of Jehovah, and of apostasy from the clean religion, and so a symbol of organized false religion. Since false religion has spread out from Babylon to the ends of the earth, she became the mother of false religion. As such, she was a good symbol of Satan the Devil’s woman, for he is the father of all impure religion. The last book of the Bible uses her in the same style as symbolizing organized false religion …Revelation 17:5).” What Has Religion Done for Mankind? pp89 - 90, Wt.B.&T.Soc, 1951

Then the book has chapters on ancient pagan religions, Hinduism, Buddhism, Confucianism, Islam, and ‘Red Religion’(Communism). All those chapters go into the history of those religions. Between two and five of their closing paragraphs say why they are false, and as being at enmity with “God’s heavenly woman”. However, the closing paragraph on Islam, written in 1951, could not foresee the massive rise of Islam world-wide, and its aggressive means of trying to subdue all other religions. Only in this 21st century have millions of non-Muslims been persecuted (horrifically), for no other reason that they are called “Christians” and will not renounce Jesus Christ. A tiny proportion of those so persecuted are Jehovah’s Witnesses, but the vast majority are not. Yet in modern literature there seems to be no acknowledgement that non-Jehovah’s Witnesses are being as brutally persecuted as are they. A passing mention might be made, but to read their material one would think Islam was out to destroy Jehovah’s Witnesses as their main target!

Back to the 1951 book and what they predicted would happen with the U. N. and it attacking religion. These preparatory claims need to be borne in mind:

“By thus crowning political rulers and teaching their divine right and so causing a union of the church (so called) and the state, the Roman Catholic Hierarchy were rejecting the kingdom of the Seed of God’s woman… When the Protestant Reformation came in the sixteenth century, did it discontinue this alliance of church and state? No! …

When Christendom’s religious systems, Catholic and Protestant, meddle in the political affairs of the world, allying themselves with the state and fighting its controversies, it is outright spiritual adultery, harlotry! It has made Christendom a pornocracy, not a theocracy…

…let the religious systems know that a violent end is in store for them at God’s hands. They have rejected Christ’s kingdom… Christendom’s flat rejection of the real kingdom of the Seed of God’s woman has come in our own critical world period beginning with A.D. 1914. That year the time came for God’s woman, his loyal heavenly organization, to bring forth the Seed in the role of enthroned reigning King… at that date is the time for the Heir with the right to it to be given the Kingdom. At that time the Kingdom was due to be born.” (Ibid. p.292 – 293 & 297 – 299)

This is fundamental to understanding why the book then said this about who would turn upon what, as per Revelation’s prophecy of the time just before Armageddon:

“Did the religious systems of Christendom exult with God’s woman at the birth of her royal Seed as King?... Not in heathendom, but in the heart of Christendom was where World War I began in 1914, the birth year of the Kingdom… But all the religious systems of Christendom favored one or another of the nations, but none of God’s newborn kingdom. Had they sided with God’s kingdom, the rightful government of earth, the war would never have flamed into a world conflagration… That is what worldly, apostate religion has done for mankind! The actions of the religious systems during World War I spoke deafeningly to say, Christendom has rejected God’s kingdom.” (Ibid. p.301)

Communists with their Red religion and the clergy of Christendom – which class is the more reprehensible? The Bible answers, The religious clergy.” (Ibid. p. 322)

“But the woman Babylon in Revelation chapter 17, pictures more the VISIBLE organization of the religious heads of heathendom and Christendom. The clergy of Christendom are viewed as the visible tie between God and men… What about the beast that she rides?... So the beast that Lady Babylon is now pictured as riding is this peace beast, formerly known as the League of Nations but now since its reappearance in 1945 the United Nations.

...The prophecies foreshadow that God will strike confusion into the ranks of his enemies and they will fight one another. First they will turn on religion, as a useless, burdensome appendage, Lady Babylon’s deceptive cries of Pax et securitas, ‘Peace and security!’ will turn to shrieks of Treachery!… The ‘ten horns’ of power on the seven heads of the peace beast [the U.N.] turn antireligious and start goring her.” (Ibid. p.328 – 330

There may be earlier such predictions in Jehovah’s Witness literature, but these quotes deal with all your questions and show that this notion is at least 73 years old. However, before the League of Nations existed, they were expecting Armageddon then, as well as during the League’s existence. And they expected Armageddon very soon after publishing that book, and still do, some 73 years later.

3
  • Hi Anne, could you add the name of the book you are quoting from in your answer? I would be interested in checking it out.
    – Michael R
    Commented May 22 at 19:48
  • 1
    @MichaelR Yes, I copy it from the end of the first quote in my answer: ” What Has Religion Done for Mankind? Wt.B.&T.Soc, 1951. It has a bright yellow hard cover and is 350 pages, including Index. It has long gone out of print. Hopefully the text has been reproduced on the Society's website. I note your 1942 quote is 9 years older than mine, so you win the "since when" part of the OPs Q!
    – Anne
    Commented May 23 at 7:57
  • 1
    Sorry @Anne you are right, thank you for pointing out that book name (I think I am going blind). And yea I guess I won so far :-D Wishing you a great day!
    – Michael R
    Commented May 24 at 13:25

You must log in to answer this question.