The Pope enjoys, by divine institution, "supreme, full, immediate, and universal power in the care of souls"

This is the text of paragraph 937 of the Catechism of the Catholic Church. How did this text get here? What council or authority decided that this is the doctrine of the Catholic Church?

2 Answers 2


Paragraph 937 of the Catechism is part of an "In Brief" section that occurs at the end of every topic of the Catechism. The "In Brief" sections are intended to summarize the paragraphs that have gone before. In this case, the paragraph is restating material that occurs in paragraphs 881 and 882. In particular:

"For the Roman Pontiff, by reason of his office as Vicar of Christ, and as pastor of the entire Church has full, supreme, and universal power over the whole Church."

paragraph 881

This is a quote from the Vatican II document Lumen Gentium. The Scriptural references supporting the statement are John 21:15-17 (" Feed my sheep") and Matthew 16:18-19.

Similarly, the constitution Pastor aeternus, promulgated by the First Vatican Council, states in Chapter III:

Full power was given to [the Roman Pontiff], in Blessed Peter, by Jesus Christ our Lord, to pasture, to rule, and to govern the Universal Church...

The specific quote that appears in paragraph 937 itself is found in the preface to the decree Christus Dominus, promulgated by Pope Paul VI in 1965.



There are two answers to the OP. According to the groups (Orthodox and Protestants) that oppose this doctrine, it arose from usurping what was given to Peter and ignoring Scripture and enlisting secular authority to enforce its view. According to the group (Roman Catholic (RC)) that teaches this doctrine, it originated by “divine institution”. We will look first at what RC says.

CCC-875 … The one sent by the Lord does not speak and act on his own authority, but by virtue of Christ's authority; not as a member of the community, but speaking to it in the name of Christ. No one can bestow grace on himself; it must be given and offered. This fact presupposes ministers of grace, authorized and empowered by Christ. From him, bishops and priests receive the mission and faculty ("the sacred power") to act in persona Christi Capitis; …. The ministry in which Christ's emissaries do and give by God's grace what they cannot do and give by their own powers, is called a "sacrament" by the Church's tradition. Indeed, the ministry of the Church is conferred by a special sacrament.

“Divine institution” thus means God appointed; authorized and empowered by Christ. From the base of CCC-875, which essentially could include any Christian (a minister of grace or of reconciliation (2 Cor. 5:18)), we move to the RC argument that it alone is supreme authority in a nutshell. This latter assertion is obviously very serious for all Christians to consider. If the doctrine is true, then those, be they Protestant or Orthodox, not in communion with the Roman Catholic Church (RC) are against God. If the doctrine is false, then RC is against God.

CCC-881 The Lord made Simon alone, whom he named Peter, the "rock" of his Church. He gave him the keys of his Church and instituted him shepherd of the whole flock. "The office of binding and loosing which was given to Peter was also assigned to the college of apostles united to its head." This pastoral office of Peter and the other apostles belongs to the Church's very foundation and is continued by the bishops under the primacy of the Pope.

The elements supreme, full, immediate, and universal will thus flow from this divine appointment so-called; we will look at each.

SUPREME (Mt. 16:18)

Simon is the “rock” of His Church. The bishops under the primacy of the Pope (Peter’s successor) carry it forward. The keys of the Church (literally kingdom of heaven) were given to Peter alone. Circa 750 CE a bishop sided with Rome’s view on a doctrine simply because when he got to heaven, he wanted Peter to open the gates. Rome had it; the other group did not, went the thinking.

FULL (Mt. 16:19)

While all the apostles were given the power of binding and loosing, it was to Peter first who received said power.

IMMEDIATE (Acts 1:20)

This authority has existed from Christ to Peter onward through a succession of bishops. See also Irenaeus and Eusebius.

UNIVERSAL (Jn. 21:15-17)

Again, this is the idea of “over all”. Christ told Peter to “feed My sheep”. This is not “your sheep in Antioch or Jerusalem” or the sheep at Rome, but essentially all of Christ’s sheep.


The previous four descriptions pertain to a certain power; that is to help souls “attain to salvation.” As mentioned, if RC is the rock and has the keys and first power to “bind and loose”, and thus if one is outside RC, then one may not be saved. The assertion has been once framed outside the Church (RC), there is no salvation.

Incidentally, RC readily admits that no Council granted this doctrine; in other words, RC is above Councils (see CCC 884).


The groups that oppose this doctrine point to a number of alternative explanations. The “rock” is not particularly Peter, but his confession of Christ. Acts 15 shows a council decision led by James, not a Petrine decision. The keys to the kingdom given to Peter were exercised when he first preached to Jew, Samaritan, and Gentile (Acts 2:14, 8:14, 10:34). Since then, the doors are open to whosoever will. The keys are no longer in use; the gates of hell will never prevail. Lastly, even if Christ commanded Peter alone to “feed My sheep”, Peter assigns this power in 1 Peter 5:2 to the elders (plural) in Asia Minor (1 Pet. 1:1). We have no other record of Peter doing so in Rome.

Also suggested above was Rome’s usage of secular authority to bolster their authority. The first example is with Constantine as guarantee of the church’s acceptance of Rome's Easter viewpoint (this eventually contributed to the Great Schism with its conflict over bread type). There are numerous other examples over time.

As mentioned, it is important to understand both sides of the doctrine; else potentially one might fall into condemnation.


So, while the basic idea of a “divine appointment” to one who preaches in and of Christ is sound, it is the next set of interpretations (rock, keys, bind/loose) where the doctrine is questionable.

  • 1
    This isn't so much an answer to the question (how did the doctrine originate?) as a value judgement about it (should it have originated?)
    – Wtrmute
    Sep 26, 2017 at 18:20
  • Hmm, divine appointment should be spelled out more clearly? RC believes that God appointed Christ who appointed Peter who appointed the bishop in Rome who appointed the next bishop in Rome and onward to the present? See more in the answer spelled out.
    – SLM
    Sep 26, 2017 at 18:31
  • My understanding of the question is that the OP asks for the history of the doctrine of Papal supremacy (or primacy): predecessor doctrines, patristic and medieval theologians who advanced or defended it, and possibly Scriptural or para-Scriptural support, while your answer seems to be principally concerned with what the doctrine claims, and whether arguments for or against those claims hold up using mostly arguments from reason.
    – Wtrmute
    Sep 26, 2017 at 18:50
  • Oddly, the answer with 11+ (so far) doesn't provide what you are asking for at all, though IMO mine fleshes it out, including some historical references. The other answer simply quotes a catechism without any explanation. Did you or others mark it down? If not, why not?
    – SLM
    Sep 26, 2017 at 19:44
  • Regarding the answer with 11+ votes, it does point out the paragraphs that the paragraph in the question restates, and furthermore the notes that the Catechism itself gives in order to trace the immediate ancestors of that doctrinal statement, which is more in the direction of answering the question than yours (in my opinion) does. However, I see you do not think my concerns are warranted; in that case, there is little else for me to say.
    – Wtrmute
    Sep 26, 2017 at 20:59

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .