5

According to the Church Fathers or other Catholic theologians, how old was St. Joseph when he married the Blessed Virgin Mary?

  • On behalf of the Orthodox, I feel I should ask, 'Which time?' – bradimus Sep 8 '17 at 1:11
  • @bradimus The Orthodox think he was married more than once‽ – Geremia Sep 8 '17 at 1:28
  • Yes (maybe). The Orthodox usually assert that Joseph was a widower before being betrothed to Mary. James and Jesus's other brothers are half-brothers from this first marriage. (I said maybe because I'm not sure if the Orthodox say that Joseph and Mary were married or only betrothed.) – bradimus Sep 8 '17 at 1:51
  • 1
    @thedarkwanderer But what about the question of the title of the article: "Was St. Joseph Previously Married?" – Geremia Sep 9 '17 at 20:49
4

According to ch. 1 of The Divine Favors Granted to St. Joseph (1973) by Père Binet, S.J., the general opinion among theologians is that St. Joseph was, when he married, "neither an old man nor a youth, but in the prime of life, between thirty and forty":

A secret inspiration from heaven caused both Mary and Joseph to contract this alliance, while adoring in their hearts the impenetrable counsel of the great God. Mary was in her fifteenth year; the age of Joseph is not known so exactly, tradition being silent on the subject. The opinion that he was about eighty years old is without reasonable grounds, and is not held by theologians, the most esteemed of whom think that he was neither an old man nor a youth, but in the prime of life, between thirty and forty. There are many reasons in support of this opinion, which is now generally held.

  • If the Isaac/Rebekah pattern continued, Isaac was about 40, which implies Joseph about 40 (Gen. 25:20). However, they lived into 100 age. – SLM Sep 9 '17 at 21:27
-1

The origin of the "old Joseph" and "young Mary" is in the Infancy Gospel of James, per Origen. Scripture implies they would have been about a similar age.

Some 200 years later, Jerome was aghast at the idea that Joseph wasn't also understood to be an ever-virgin. He then invented the cousin theory to explain the nature of the brothers and sisters of Jesus. Cousins, rather than children of old Joseph from a previous marriage when he was younger.

So, to answer the OP question, the answer about ages will depend upon your source. Scripture (implies about same age), Infancy Gospel (old Joseph, young Mary), Jerome (unclear, though probably about same age, but no consummated marriage). To be sure, there are many others (Origen, Valentinus, Tertullian, Clement of Alexandria, Cyril of Jerusalem, Hegesippius, and others) who opined about this issue.

Infancy Gospel of James

book of James reference 5265 below

The Brethren of Jesus --- Origen

And they [home town folk] spoke, wondering, (not knowing that He was the son of a virgin, or not believing it even if it was told to them, but supposing that He was the son of Joseph the carpenter,) “is not this the carpenter’s son?”5262 And depreciating the whole of what appeared to be His nearest kindred, they said, “Is not His mother called Mary? And His brethren, James and Joseph and Simon and Judas? And His sisters, are they not all with us?”5263 They thought, then, that He was the son of Joseph and Mary. But some say, basing it on a tradition in the Gospel according to Peter,5264 as it is entitled, or “The Book of James,”5265 that the brethren of Jesus were sons of Joseph by a former wife, whom he married before Mary. Now those who say so wish to preserve the honour of Mary in virginity to the end, so that that body of hers which was appointed to minister to the Word which said, “The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Most High shall overshadow thee,”5266 might not know intercourse with a man after that the Holy Ghost came into her and the power from on high overshadowed her. And I think it in harmony with reason that Jesus was the first-fruit among men of the purity which consists in chastity, and Mary among women; for it were not pious to ascribe to any other than to her the first-fruit of virginity.

  • The gospel of James hardly counts as a writing of "the Church Fathers or other Catholic Theologians". Also, Origen says that the Gospel of James is echoing an earlier, also-dubious Gospel of Peter with the claim regarding Joseph's previous marriage, though the assertion that either work was the source of the belief seems unlikely to be correct. – the dark wanderer Sep 8 '17 at 4:30
  • 1
    "Scripture (same age)" is not the teaching of Scripture. – Sola Gratia Sep 8 '17 at 12:49
  • Origen "basing it on a tradition" from GoP or Infancy Gospel of James; that's the source (not scripture). IOW, Origen does not say basing it on a tradition from some source (like an apostle or scripture) prior to Infancy Gospel that is written. – SLM Sep 8 '17 at 13:39
  • 1
    Can you provide book, chapter and verse of the bible where Scripture states they would have been of a similar age? – freethinker36 Sep 9 '17 at 14:29
  • 2
    SLM that does not imply anything about the age of Joseph. It doesn't even prove he was still alive or working. It only proves that the people knew who he was and considering that his home town was likely populated by no more than 200 people, Joseph could have been dead for years and people would still know who he was. The reality is that the scripture tells us nothing about the age of Joseph. – P. TJ Sep 9 '17 at 21:11

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.