2

A question about hagiography. It is said that Saint Rita's mother Amata Ferri was old when her daughter was born, and she had been sterile for a very long time. But how old was she, if anyone knows her biography (even an approximation if you have).

1

Ch. 2, "The Birthplace and Parents of St. Rita," of Sicardo & Murphy's 1916 biography of her says Antonio Lotti and Amata Ferri were married in 1309. Ch. 3, "St. Rita's Birth," says "The biographers of St. Rita give the day, date and year of her birth as Saturday, May 22, in the year of Our Lord 1381, during the pontificate of Pope Urban VI."

So, assuming she married at an age of 12* in circa 1297, this means Amata was at least 84 years old** when she had St. Rita.
(If she married in her 20s in circa 1289, she would've been at least 92 when she had St. Rita!)
*the youngest age, according to canon law, that a female could marry back then, assuming she reached puberty by then; in fact St. Rita herself became a wife at 12 years of age according to this
**cf. Abraham's wife Sarah, who was 90 years old when she had her first child (Gen. 17:17)

Ibid. says:

Words cannot describe the indescribable joy of Antonio and Amata as, with loving eyes, they gazed on their little daughter whom they considered a precious gift of God, the fruit of their desires, and the reward of their long years of hope and confidence in God. The unexpected news that Amata Ferri had become a mother in her old age was the cause of much surprise, talk, and gossip among the inhabitants of Rocca Porrena. All considered the event as truly miraculous. Every man, woman, and grownup child of the little hamlet went to offer congratulations to the happy and overjoyed parents, and all who gazed on the smiling face of the newborn babe were charmed by the radiance of the little one’s wonderful beauty.

  • If they were married in 1309, and the daughter was born in 1381, doesn't that mean she would be at least 84 years old (if married at 12) or early 90s (if married in 20s)? – Samuel Bradshaw Jul 5 '17 at 3:08
  • @SamuelBradshaw Thanks for the correction. Quite miraculous indeed! (The Guiness Book of World Records records a 59 year old lady conceived naturally in 1997.) – Geremia Jul 5 '17 at 4:38
  • May 22 1381 was a Wednesday.. – davidlol Jul 5 '17 at 11:11
  • @davidlol The Gregorian calendar wasn't in use before 1583, and 10-13 days were subtracted when it came into use (cf. ch. 7, pp. 59ff. of Astronomical Algorithms). Perhaps this is why the author thinks it's a different day of the week. This converter does say 22 May 1381 (Julian) = Wednesday = 30 May 1381 (Gregorian)… – Geremia Jul 5 '17 at 17:58

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.