The terms orthodox and catholic have immense significance to those that seek to make exclusive truth claims about their particular Christian Tradition. Both Roman Catholics and Eastern Orthodox trace their descent from (prior to schism) one catholic and orthodox Church. As a result, it would seem to be virtually impossible to concede the exclusive use of one of these terms to "the other side".

How do the Eastern Orthodox view using the terms catholic or Catholic generally, but particularly in regard to describing Roman Catholicism?

This is one of a number of related questions I intend to ask regarding the Great (East-West) Schism, terminology and self-identication of the resulting Churches.

The others so far:

  • I am tempted to propose a new tag [splitters] to cover topics of this nature. Commented Jun 21, 2017 at 22:27

2 Answers 2


The term "catholic" appears in the revision to the Nicene Creed accepted at the 2nd Ecumenical Council at Constantinople in 381:

We believe ... in one holy catholic and apostolic Church1

The Greek word is καθολικός (katholikos) and is taken to mean "general" or "universal". It is not a word that really appears in the Bible, though it is found in some manuscripts in the title of the Epistle of James (i.e. The Catholic Epistle of James).

Protopresbyter Michael Pomazansky explains the understanding of the word as follows:

The word catholikos in ancient Greek, pre-Christian literature is encountered very rarely. However, the Christian Church from antiquity chose this word to signify one of the principal attributes of the Church, namely, to express its universal character. Even though it had at its disposal such words as cosmos (the world), or oikoumene (the inhabited earth), evidently these latter words were insufficient to express a certain new concept which is present only to the Christian consciousness. In the ancient Symbols of Faith, wherever the word “Church” appears, it is unfailingly with the definition “catholic.” Thus, in the Jerusalem Symbol of Faith we read: “And in one, holy, catholic Church”; in the Symbol of Rome: “In the holy, catholic Church, the communion of the Saints”; etc. In ancient Christian literature, this term is encountered several times in St. Ignatius the God-bearer, an Apostolic Father, for example when he says, “Where Jesus Christ is, there is the catholic Church.” This term is constantly to be found in the Acts of all the Ecumenical Councils. In the direct translation of the word, it signifies the highest degree of all-embracingness, wholeness, fullness (being derived from cath ola, meaning “throughout the whole”).2

The Eastern Orthodox Church sees itself as "Catholic". Question No. 270 of the Longer Catechism of the Orthodox, Catholic, Eastern Church asks:

Why is the Church called Catholic, or, which is the same thing, Universal?

Metropolitan Philaret (the author of this particular catechism) writes:

Because she is not limited to any place, nor time, nor people, but contains true believers of all places, times, and peoples.

The Apostle Paul says that the Word of the Gospel is in all the world; and bringeth forth fruit (Col 1:5-6), and that in the Christian Church there is neither Greek nor Jew, circumcision nor uncircumcision, barbarian nor Scythian, bond nor free: but Christ is all, and in all (Col 3:11). They which be of faith, are blessed with faithful Abraham (Gal 3:9).

Elder Cleopas (Ilie) of Romania expands on this understanding in his book, The Truth of Our Faith:

With the word "Catholic" we may suggest that the Church has it as Her purpose to spread throughout the whole world, comprising Christians of every place, every age, and of all people. This is confirmed by the following commandment of Christ: Go ye therefore, and teach all nations ... Moreover, the Church is called Catholic since its entire teaching is the undistorted truth, which was given by Christ to the Apostles and through them to the world. While on the contrary, heresy possesses but a portion of the truth.3

While many outside the Eastern Orthodox Church presume that the major difference between the Orthodox Church and the Roman Catholic Church is the recognition of papal authority, in reality I think that this is a relatively minor point. The Pope having jurisdiction over territories outside of the See of Rome would be seen as non-canonical (in violation of the canons of the 1st Ecumenical Council), but not heretical. Within the Eastern Orthodox Church today there are dozens of such jurisdictional disputes, including the overlap of non-canonical episcopates from several Patriarchates within the Unites States.

The issue touching on how the east views the catholicity of Rome has to do with Elder Cleopas' point about catholicity also implying holding the fullness of truth. The Roman Catholic Church, which grew from the ancient See of Rome, and the Eastern Orthodox Church, which includes the other four ancient Sees, differ on a number of significant theological points to such an extent that Rome is actually seen as being in not only schism but heresy.4 For this reason, the Eastern Orthodox Church does not recognize the Roman Catholic Church as being truly "Catholic". It is understood to possess a portion of the truth, but not the fullness of truth.

1. Nicene-Constantinopolitan Creed
2. Orthodox Dogmatic Theology (3rd ed.), pp.245-6
3. pp.42-43.
4. See, e.g., the 1848 Encyclical of the Eastern Patriarchs

  • Thanks for your answer, given your point that 'the Eastern Orthodox Church does not recognize the Roman Catholic Church as being truly "Catholic"', are there any norms for how to refer to the RCC appropriately? Commented Jun 21, 2017 at 18:09
  • 2
    Not really. Despite what is written above, as a practical matter the Roman Catholic Church is referred to as the "Roman Catholic Church", or perhaps, the "Roman Church". There is no hierarch jumping up and down somewhere (that I know of) insisting that people not call the Roman Catholic Church "Catholic".
    – guest37
    Commented Jun 21, 2017 at 18:34

Along with the direct answer to the question, there will be a small amount of extra information to make up for those who are not as knowledgeable on East and West history as the questioner of these terms.

Points to be made surrounding questions: - Original Use - Extended Use - Use to identify a particular group - How some Western people understand the word - Particularly in regard to describing Roman Catholicism:

1.How Orthodox understand the word "Catholic" in general:

Many words can mean more than one thing. Likewise context plays a role. My understanding is that although the Orthodox Church recognizes "Universal" as a meaning, and uses it as such. The Orthodox also understand and use of this word in it's original meaning in the Greek, καθόλου (katholou), "on the whole". We need to abstract that the word as an original meaning "on the whole", but has also has been used as the meaning "Universal" as well.
I have found the words Catholic used in the Ante-Nicene and Post-Nicene fathers collection, which specifically refers to the Church in it's pre-schism state, and leans more toward the original meaning of Catholic as the "Whole" Church, made up of all the original Patriarchs. That is the Patriarchs of Alexandria, Antioch, Constantinople, Jerusalem and Rome. These are the five original Patriarchs and major centers of the One Holy Catholic(whole) and Apostolic Church, maintaining it's Orthodox (Greek for Ortho-True Doxy-Teaching) teachings (including Rome) until the Great Schism, for which Rome is separated from the other four Patriarchs. Every time the word Catholic is used in these ancient writings, it is not referring to a particular See (jurisdiction), whether it be Antioch or Rome, but simply the "whole" Catholic united pre-schism Church. Today it's still used in it's original meaning "on the whole" as well as "Universal" based on context.

-Orthodox automatically implies Catholic (but not what Protestants think when they hear the word) Today the official title of the Eastern Orthodox Church is the "Orthodox Catholic Church",to identify themselves as the Orthodox Catholic Church. So every Orthodox Christian identifies themselves as Orthodox Catholic and a member of the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. It should be noted that at every Eastern Orthodox liturgy the Nicene Creed is proclaimed in it's original form and the Eastern Orthodox Catholic Church understands themselves to be the One Holy Catholic and Apostolic Church. This may be a week analogy, but from a complete outsiders perspective you could look at Catholic /west and Orthodox /east as something similar to Jew vs Orthodox Jew. Rome calling themselves Catholic and Orthodox being Orthodox Catholic.

It should also be noted that from an American Protestant perspective, especially those who do not know about the Orthodox Church, that the word "Catholic" has a more singular different meaning. The word brings thoughts and ideas of only Rome, teachings within Roman Catholicism, the Pope, issues before and after the Reformation, Purgatory,etc. Likewise, to say you are Orthodox to an unaware Protestant, sometimes you will be asked if you are a Jew, or in rare cases Greek Orthodox. Obviously individuals trying to related to the word, the best they can.

Going back to the Orthodox perspective, the third use of the word Catholic, is to identify the particular See of Rome. Mainly because to use the word Orthodox implies Orthodox Catholic. So yes, you will hear Orthodox very often refer to Catholic as just the See of Rome or those individuals who identify as Roman Catholic. There are exceptions and also exceptions depending on context.. Some Orthodox choose to say the "Roman Church", not Roman Catholic, or sometimes "Romans" believing they do not have a Catholic status being in Schism, in the context of "whole". This is abstract from a sentence where someone is referring to a Roman believers Catholic heritage, for which we will address in your next question about Roman Catholicism as a word.

As you can see from the examples above, context, as well as the person you are talking to, and their knowledge, or lack of knowledge on the subject means a lot. Certain similar situations could be applied to the word Orthodox. A Syrian Orthodox could be asked if they are Greek Orthodox by a stranger they know does not understand the history, and it's easier to just say "yes", than try to describe 2,000 years of history, Orthodox Catholicism, or the relationships between the united Patriarchs of the East.

  1. Particularly in regard to describing Roman Catholicism:

    My understanding of the Eastern perspective in using "Catholicism" in "Roman Catholicism" is the following. The word is not being used in it's original Greek meaning of "whole", but rather it is being used to represent Rome's Catholic heritage and some of the theology, sacraments etc, that they still do recognize, teach, believe,etc. In this context it is as well understood as an "ism", and treated within an understanding of an individual group's teachings. "Rome's version of Catholicism". An Eastern Orthodox Catholic Catechumen is taught that any changes that occurred within Rome's teachings, after / post Great Schism are not considered Ecumenical, not "whole", not Catholic teachings. Out of the five pre-schism patriarchs or nine post-schism, Today Rome is still alone in many of their added post-schism teachings, while the other four original and now nine Eastern Patriarchs still hold to all pre-schism Sacraments, Holy Tradition,teachings, etc. "Roman Catholicism" is a mixed bag of some original Catholic Apostolic teachings, sacraments, theology that were apart of their "whole" Catholic historical lineage, heritage, understanding. As well there are newly added doctrines and teachings not recognized by the Orthodox Catholic East.

    In Summary: Your first perspective: Your question is very logical and your leaning toward a logical answer of Rome not being Catholic could be defended, but "only" from that single context of the word's original meaning "whole", and Rome being alone, by themselves, not "whole", with the other, now nine Patriarchs. However going back to the context of Catholic representing historical heritage of theology, doctrine, tradition, lineage, etc. Rome is for sure "Catholic" in this context. It's true there are certain Sacraments they do not recognize, there are numerous newly added changes to many areas of Roman Catholicism that are not recognized by the Orthodox, but they are still considered Catholic from this context. A word with multiple meanings and context means everything.

  • Thanks. Your answer is informative and substantive. Despite the length, it would be greatly improved if you could cite Orthodox sources in support of your points. Commented Jun 23, 2017 at 16:53

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .