4

I think I'm familiar with Consubstantiation. It is the belief that

the fundamental "substance" of the body and blood of Christ are present alongside the substance of the bread and wine, which remain present.

Impanation is a new one for me. I learned it earlier today when reading about John Huss, where it was ascribed to John Wycliffe (oddly, Wikipedia on Wycliffe has no mention of Impanation. Apparently, according to Wikipedia, Impanation is the belief of the

the real presence of the body of Jesus Christ in the consecrated bread of the Eucharist that does not imply a change in the substance of either the bread or the body ... This view is similar but not identical to the theory of consubstantiation.

It seems that both descriptions say the same thing. The substance of Christ is present in the bread, but the substance of neither is changed. The only hint I have that they are different is the Impanation definition used "real presence" which is a distinctly Catholic term, and then further insists they are different without explanation.

How are they different? And since I'm unfamiliar with Impanation, what Christian groups are said to believe it?

3

Impanation is the opposite of Transubstantiation.

Transubstantiation: No Bread. Only Christ.

Consubstantiation: Christ is present along with the bread

Impanation: Christ is present as the substance of bread. That is "Christ has become bread".

The following table might help you understand:

Substance of        |   Bread   |   Christ      | End Result
--------------------------------------------------------------
Transubstantiation  |   ✘       |   ✔           | Bread becomes Christ
Consubstantiation   |   ✔       |   ✔           | Christ is "in, with and under the bread" 
Impanation          |   ✔       |   ☑ as bread  | Christ becomes bread 

The proponents of Impanation believe that it occurs in the same way God (a different type of being) became man. That is, God took humanity and raised it to the level of his divinity. There by sharing his divine attributes with his humanity (like getting into a locked room with his physical body). In the same way Christ's divine attributes are shared by the Eucharistic bread via his body.

Sources:

  • Are you sure about your description of Impanation, "Christ has become bread"? That would mean Wikipedia is wrong (not too unusual on technical matters). Some sourcing would certainly help. – 3961 Feb 27 '17 at 18:40
  • @fredsbend I am sorry, but wikipedia clearly states Impanation doctrine is the assertion that "God is made bread". Christ is God. I used the words "made" and "become" interchangeably. May be that usage is wrong? If not, I don't understand how my answer differs from that of wikipedia. (Also added a couple of sources) – Jayarathina Madharasan Feb 28 '17 at 12:31
  • Yes, I see that now. +1 – 3961 Feb 28 '17 at 15:32

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.